Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computer-aided analysis of prostate multiparametric MR images: an unsupervised fusion-based approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to provide an automatic framework for computer-aided analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance (mp-MR) images of prostate.

Method

We introduce a novel method for the unsupervised analysis of the images. An evidential C-means classifier was adapted for use with a segmentation scheme to address multisource data and to manage conflicts and redundancy.

Results

Experiments were conducted using data from 15 patients. The evaluation protocol consisted in evaluating the method abilities to classify prostate tissues, showing the same behaviour on the mp-MR images, into homogeneous classes. As the actual diagnosis was available, thanks to the correlation with histopathological findings, the assessment focused on the ability to segment cancer foci. The method exhibited global sensitivity and specificity of 70 and 88 %, respectively.

Conclusion

The preliminary results obtained by these initial experiments showed that the method can be applied in clinical routine practice to help making decision especially for practitioners with limited experience in prostate MRI analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S (2007) Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(1):146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD (1995) Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 33(4):564–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (2012) DCE MRI Quantification profile. http://rsna.org/QIBA_.aspx

  4. Bloch I (1996) Some aspects of dempster-shafer evidence theory for classification of multi-modality medical images taking partial volume effect into account. Pattern Recogn Lett 17(8):905–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Capelle AS, Colot O, Fernandez-Maloigne C (2004) Evidential segmentation scheme of multi-echo MR images for the detection of brain tumors using neighborhood information. Inf Fusion 5(3):203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen SYJ, Lin WC, Chen CT (1993) Evidential reasoning based on Dempster-Shafer theory and its application to medical image analysis. Neural Stoch Methods Image Signal Process II 2032:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Masson MH, Denoeux T (2011) ECM:An evidential version of the fuzzy c-means algorithm. Pattern Recogn 41:1384–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Makni N, Iancu A, Colot O, Puech P, Mordon S, Betrouni N (2011) Zonal segmentation of prostate using multispectral magnetic resonance images. Med Phys 38(11):6093–6105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan W, Wells R, Mulkern S, Haker J, Zhang K, Zou S, Maier, Tempany C (2003) Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, t2-mapping and t2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a multichannel statistical classifier. Med Phys 30(9):2390–2398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Madabhushi A, Feldman MD, Metaxas DN, Tomaszeweski J, Chute D (2005) Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24(12):1611–1625

  11. Vos PC, Hambrock T, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2008) Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Med Phys 35(3):888–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Puech P, Betrouni N, Makni N, Dewalle AS, Villers A, Lemaitre L (2009) Computer-assisted diagnosis of prostate cancer using DCE-MRI data: design, implementation and preliminary results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vos PC, Hambrock T, Barenstz JO, Huisman HJ (2010) Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using t2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced t1-weighted MRI. Phys Med Biol 55(6):1719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopes R, Ayache A, Makni N, Puech P, Villers A, Mordon S, Betrouni N (2011) Prostate cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features. Med Phys 38(1):83–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Niaf E, Rouvière O, Mège-Lechevallier F, Bratan F, Lartizien C (2012) Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI. Phys Med Biol 57(12):3833–3851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah V, Turkbey B, Mani H, Pang Y, Pohida T, Merino M, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Bernardo M (2012) Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 39(7):4093–4103

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chesnais AL, Niaf E, Bratan F, Mège-Lechevallier F, Roche S, Rabilloud M, Colombel M, Rouvière O (2013) Differentiation of transitional zone prostate cancer from benign hyperplasia nodules: evaluation of discriminant criteria at multiparametric MRI. Clin Radiol 68(6):323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoeks CMA, Hambrock T, Yakar D, Hulsbergen-van de kaa CA, Feuth T, Witjes JA, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO (2013) Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 266:207–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hambrock T, Vos PC, Hulbergen-van de Kaa CA, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2013) Prostate cancer: computer-aided diagnosis with multiparametric 3-T MR imaging-effect on observer performance. Radiology 266(521):530

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tiwari P, Rosen M, Madabhushi A (2009) A hierarchical spectral clustering and nonlinear dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Med Phys 39(9):3927–3939

  21. Liu X, Langer DL, Haider MA, Yang Y, Wernick MN, Yetik (2009) Prostate cancer segmentation with simultaneous estimation of markov random field parameters and class. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(6):906–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozer S, Langer D, Liu X, Haider M, van der Kwast T, Evans A, Yang Y, Wernick M, Yetik I (2010) Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI. Med Phys 37(4):1873–1883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lopes R, Ayache A, Makni N, Puech P, Villers A, Mordon S, Betrouni N (2011) Prostate Cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features. Med Phys 38(1):83–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopes R, Betrouni N (2009) Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 13(4):634–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Postaire JG, Vasseur C (1981) An approximate solution to normal mixture identification with application to unsupervised pattern classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 3(2):163–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Denoeux T, Masson MH (2004) Evidential clustering of proximity data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 34:95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smets P (2007) Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Inf Fusion 8(4):387–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McNeal JE, Haillot O (2001) Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume. Prostate 49:48–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Puech P, Potiron E, Lemaitre L, Leroy X, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Villers A (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced–magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 74(5):1094–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiwari P, Viswanath S, Kurhanewicz J, Madabhushi A (2011) Weighted combination of multi-parametric MR imaging markers for evaluating radiation therapy related changes in the prostate. In: Prostate cancer imaging. Image analysis and image-guided interventions. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6963. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 80–91

Download references

Conflict of interest

Nacim Betrouni, Nasr Makni, Said Lakroum, Philippe Puech, Arnauld Villers and Serge Mordon declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Betrouni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Betrouni, N., Makni, N., Lakroum, S. et al. Computer-aided analysis of prostate multiparametric MR images: an unsupervised fusion-based approach. Int J CARS 10, 1515–1526 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1151-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1151-z

Keywords

Navigation