Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study is to provide an automatic framework for computer-aided analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance (mp-MR) images of prostate.
Method
We introduce a novel method for the unsupervised analysis of the images. An evidential C-means classifier was adapted for use with a segmentation scheme to address multisource data and to manage conflicts and redundancy.
Results
Experiments were conducted using data from 15 patients. The evaluation protocol consisted in evaluating the method abilities to classify prostate tissues, showing the same behaviour on the mp-MR images, into homogeneous classes. As the actual diagnosis was available, thanks to the correlation with histopathological findings, the assessment focused on the ability to segment cancer foci. The method exhibited global sensitivity and specificity of 70 and 88 %, respectively.
Conclusion
The preliminary results obtained by these initial experiments showed that the method can be applied in clinical routine practice to help making decision especially for practitioners with limited experience in prostate MRI analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S (2007) Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(1):146–152
Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD (1995) Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 33(4):564–568
Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (2012) DCE MRI Quantification profile. http://rsna.org/QIBA_.aspx
Bloch I (1996) Some aspects of dempster-shafer evidence theory for classification of multi-modality medical images taking partial volume effect into account. Pattern Recogn Lett 17(8):905–920
Capelle AS, Colot O, Fernandez-Maloigne C (2004) Evidential segmentation scheme of multi-echo MR images for the detection of brain tumors using neighborhood information. Inf Fusion 5(3):203–216
Chen SYJ, Lin WC, Chen CT (1993) Evidential reasoning based on Dempster-Shafer theory and its application to medical image analysis. Neural Stoch Methods Image Signal Process II 2032:35–46
Masson MH, Denoeux T (2011) ECM:An evidential version of the fuzzy c-means algorithm. Pattern Recogn 41:1384–1397
Makni N, Iancu A, Colot O, Puech P, Mordon S, Betrouni N (2011) Zonal segmentation of prostate using multispectral magnetic resonance images. Med Phys 38(11):6093–6105
Chan W, Wells R, Mulkern S, Haker J, Zhang K, Zou S, Maier, Tempany C (2003) Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, t2-mapping and t2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a multichannel statistical classifier. Med Phys 30(9):2390–2398
Madabhushi A, Feldman MD, Metaxas DN, Tomaszeweski J, Chute D (2005) Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24(12):1611–1625
Vos PC, Hambrock T, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2008) Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Med Phys 35(3):888–899
Puech P, Betrouni N, Makni N, Dewalle AS, Villers A, Lemaitre L (2009) Computer-assisted diagnosis of prostate cancer using DCE-MRI data: design, implementation and preliminary results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4:1–10
Vos PC, Hambrock T, Barenstz JO, Huisman HJ (2010) Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using t2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced t1-weighted MRI. Phys Med Biol 55(6):1719
Lopes R, Ayache A, Makni N, Puech P, Villers A, Mordon S, Betrouni N (2011) Prostate cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features. Med Phys 38(1):83–95
Niaf E, Rouvière O, Mège-Lechevallier F, Bratan F, Lartizien C (2012) Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI. Phys Med Biol 57(12):3833–3851
Shah V, Turkbey B, Mani H, Pang Y, Pohida T, Merino M, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Bernardo M (2012) Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 39(7):4093–4103
Chesnais AL, Niaf E, Bratan F, Mège-Lechevallier F, Roche S, Rabilloud M, Colombel M, Rouvière O (2013) Differentiation of transitional zone prostate cancer from benign hyperplasia nodules: evaluation of discriminant criteria at multiparametric MRI. Clin Radiol 68(6):323–330
Hoeks CMA, Hambrock T, Yakar D, Hulsbergen-van de kaa CA, Feuth T, Witjes JA, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO (2013) Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 266:207–217
Hambrock T, Vos PC, Hulbergen-van de Kaa CA, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ (2013) Prostate cancer: computer-aided diagnosis with multiparametric 3-T MR imaging-effect on observer performance. Radiology 266(521):530
Tiwari P, Rosen M, Madabhushi A (2009) A hierarchical spectral clustering and nonlinear dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Med Phys 39(9):3927–3939
Liu X, Langer DL, Haider MA, Yang Y, Wernick MN, Yetik (2009) Prostate cancer segmentation with simultaneous estimation of markov random field parameters and class. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(6):906–915
Ozer S, Langer D, Liu X, Haider M, van der Kwast T, Evans A, Yang Y, Wernick M, Yetik I (2010) Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI. Med Phys 37(4):1873–1883
Lopes R, Ayache A, Makni N, Puech P, Villers A, Mordon S, Betrouni N (2011) Prostate Cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features. Med Phys 38(1):83–95
Lopes R, Betrouni N (2009) Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 13(4):634–649
Postaire JG, Vasseur C (1981) An approximate solution to normal mixture identification with application to unsupervised pattern classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 3(2):163–179
Denoeux T, Masson MH (2004) Evidential clustering of proximity data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 34:95–109
Smets P (2007) Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Inf Fusion 8(4):387–412
McNeal JE, Haillot O (2001) Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume. Prostate 49:48–57
Puech P, Potiron E, Lemaitre L, Leroy X, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Villers A (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced–magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 74(5):1094–1099
Tiwari P, Viswanath S, Kurhanewicz J, Madabhushi A (2011) Weighted combination of multi-parametric MR imaging markers for evaluating radiation therapy related changes in the prostate. In: Prostate cancer imaging. Image analysis and image-guided interventions. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6963. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 80–91
Conflict of interest
Nacim Betrouni, Nasr Makni, Said Lakroum, Philippe Puech, Arnauld Villers and Serge Mordon declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Betrouni, N., Makni, N., Lakroum, S. et al. Computer-aided analysis of prostate multiparametric MR images: an unsupervised fusion-based approach. Int J CARS 10, 1515–1526 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1151-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1151-z