Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MRI, US or real-time virtual sonography in the evaluation of adenomyosis?

  • MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Real-time virtual sonography (RVS) allows displaying and synchronizing real-time US and multiplanar reconstruction of MRI images. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and ability of RVS to assess adenomyosis since literature shows US itself has a reduced diagnostic accuracy compared to MRI.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted over a 4-month period (March–June 2015). We enrolled in the study 52 women with clinical symptoms of dysmenorrhea, methrorragia and infertility. Every patient underwent an endovaginal US examination, followed by a 3T MRI exam and a RVS exam (Hitachi HI Vision Ascendus). The MRI image dataset acquired at the time of the examination was loaded into the fusion system and displayed together with the US images. Both sets of images were then manually synchronized and images were registered using multiple plane MR imaging. Radiologist was asked to report all three examinations separately.

Results

On a total of 52 patients, on standard endovaginal US, adenomyosis was detected in 27 cases: of these, 21 presented diffuse adenomyosis, and 6 cases focal form of adenomyosis. MRI detected adenomyosis in 30 cases: 22 of these appeared as diffuse form and 8 as focal form, such as adenomyoma and adenomyotic cyst, thus resulting in 3 misdiagnosed cases on US. RVS confirmed all 22 cases of diffuse adenomyosis and all 8 cases of focal adenomyosis.

Conclusions

Thanks to information from both US and MRI, fusion imaging allows better identification of adenomyosis and could improve the performance of ultrasound operator thus to implement the contribution of TVUS in daily practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Noe M, Kissler S, Leyendecker G (2005) Adenomyosis in endometriosis–prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 20(8):2309–2316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz R (1989) Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 16(1):221–235

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kunz G, Herbertz M, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G (2007) Adenomyosis as a disorder of the early and late human reproductive period. Reprod Biomed Online 15(6):681–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM et al (2001) Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 16:2427–2433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH et al (1994) Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 190:803–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ et al (1995) The nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol 86:461–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Volkers NA, Hehenkamp WJ, Spijkerboer AM, Moolhuijzen AD, Birnie E, Ankum WM et al (2008) MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 31:260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiori O, Darai E (2006) Adenomyosis in endometriosis–prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 21(4):1101–1102 (author reply 1102-3)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dueholm M (2006) Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:569–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R et al (1996) Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 199:151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A et al (2011) Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37(4):471–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung EM, Friedrich C, Hoffstetter P, Dendl LM, Klebl F, Agha A, Wiggermann P, Stroszcynski C, Schreyer AG (2012) Volume navigation with contrast enhanced ultrasound and image fusion for percutaneous interventions: first results. PLoS One 7(3):e33956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Abi-Jaoudeh N, Kruecker J, Kadoury S, Kobeiter H, Venkatesan AM, Levy E, Wood BJ (2012) Multimodality image fusion-guided procedures: technique, accuracy, and applications. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35:986–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JY, Choi BI, Chung YE, Kim MW, Kim SH (2012) Han JK Clinical value of CT/MR-ultrasound fusion imaging for radiofrequency ablation of hepatic nodules. Eur J Radiol 81:2281–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Millischer AE, Salomon LJ, Santulli P, Borghese B, Dousset B, Chapron C (2015) Fusion imaging for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: feasibility and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(1):109–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, Van Schoubroeck D, Landolfo C, Installé AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Gordts S, Benacerraf B, D’Hooghe T, De Moor B, Brölmann H, Goldstein S, Epstein E, Bourne T, Timmerman D (2015) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features ofmyometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(3):284–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeuchi Ml, Matsuzaki K (2011) Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques. Radiographics 31(1):99–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maubon A, Faury A, Kapella M, Pouquet M, Piver P (2010) Uterine junctional zone at magnetic resonance imaging: a predictor of in vitro fertilization implantation failure. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(3):611–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernando S, Breheny S, Jaques AM, Halliday JL, Baker G, Healy D (2009) Preterm birth, ovarian endometriomata, and assisted reproduction technologies. Fertil Steril 91(2):325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lone FW, Balogun M, Khan KS (2006) Adenomyosis: not such an elusive diagnosis any longer. J Obstet Gynaecol 26(3):225–228 (review)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS (2010) Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(11):1374–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Luca Mastrogirolamo for his expertise which helped us in the successful comprehension of the RVS and its application.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiological Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy

    Valeria Vinci, Matteo Saldari, Maria Eleonora Sergi, Silvia Bernardo, Carlo Catalano & Lucia Manganaro

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

    Giuseppe Rizzo

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umberto I Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00168, Rome, Italy

    Maria Grazia Porpora

Authors
  1. Valeria Vinci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Saldari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Eleonora Sergi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Silvia Bernardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giuseppe Rizzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria Grazia Porpora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Carlo Catalano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lucia Manganaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Manganaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

Dr Lucia Manganaro has received a speaker honorarium from Hitachi Medical Systems S.p.A.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinci, V., Saldari, M., Sergi, M.E. et al. MRI, US or real-time virtual sonography in the evaluation of adenomyosis?. Radiol med 122, 361–368 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0729-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0729-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation