Skip to main content
Log in

Microtuberization of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as Influenced by Supplementary Nutrients, Plant Growth Regulators, and In Vitro Culture Conditions

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Five experiments with in vitro-grown plantlets of potato cvs ‘Superior,’ ‘Early Valley,’ ‘Golden Valley,’ and ‘Winter Valley’ were carried out to investigate in a stepwise approach the potential for enhancing microtuber production of (1) adding supplementary nutrients (SN) including KNO3, NH4H2PO4, Ca(NO3)2.4H2O, and MgSO4 in full- or half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, (2) adding a pretested combination of plant growth regulators (PGRs), i.e., 10 mg l−1 6-benzyl aminopurine plus 200 mg l−1 succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhydrazide, (3) varying the timing of the supplemental applications, and (4) varying the replenishment of the medium. Plantlets of ‘Superior’ for microtuberization were grown from two-node explants for 75 days under environmental conditions consisting of 22 ± 2 °C and a 16-h photoperiod on a solid basal medium consisting of half-strength MS (1/2 MS) medium containing 6 % sucrose and a moderate concentration of supplementary nutrients, SN-2 (KNO3, 1.22 g l−1; NH4H2PO4, 1.41 g l−1; Ca(NO3)24H2O, 0.23 g l−1; and MgSO4, 0.74 g l−1). Thereafter, plantlets were grown for 60 days under dark conditions. Liquid media containing different combinations of MS, SN, and PGR levels plus 8 % sucrose were added as a supplement and were evaluated for their ability to increase tuberization compared to the control composition of the supplement (MS with 8 % sucrose). In the first experiment, addition of 1/2 MS liquid medium containing 8 % sucrose and SN-2 before dark incubation induced the highest total number of microtubers (on average 1.4 per plantlet), a significantly higher weight and size than the control, and the highest percentage (50 %) of large-sized (>500 mg) microtubers. In the second experiment, addition of 1/2 MS liquid medium containing 8 % sucrose, SN-2, and PGRs produced the highest number (on average 1.5 per plantlet) and total yield (on average 971 mg per plantlet) of microtubers, and significantly the highest percentage (66 %) of large-sized (>500 mg) microtubers. The size of the microtubers was higher than for the treatment without growth regulators. The optimum time for addition of supplemental medium containing 8 % sucrose, SN-2, and PGRs was shown in experiment 3 to be latest 1 week before dark incubation. This timing resulted in both the highest microtuber number (on average 1.6 per plantlet) and yield (on average 1208 mg per plantlet), and the highest percentage (64 %) of large-sized microtubers. Finally, it was found that a second supplemental treatment consisting of 50 % replacement of the liquid medium (by volume) 2 weeks after transfer to dark conditions gave rise to the highest number (on average 1.9 per plantlet), yield (on average 1346 mg per plant), and also significantly the highest percentage (25 %) of large-sized microtubers (>1000 mg) as compared to replacement of a greater or smaller proportion of the medium. Four potato cultivars, ‘Superior,’ ‘Early Valley,’ ‘Golden Valley,’ and ‘Winter Valley’ produced acceptable numbers and yield of microtubers of relatively large-sized tubers using a process that included supplemental liquid medium with 1/2 MS, 8 % sucrose, moderate concentration (SN-2) of SNs and PGRs, followed by a 50 % replacement of the same medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

6-Benzylaminopurine

B 9:

Succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhydrazide

MS:

Murashige and Skoog (1962) culture medium

PGR:

Plant growth regulator

SN:

Supplementary nutrients

References

  • Abbot AJ, Belcher AR (1986) Potato tuber formation in vitro. In: Withers LA, Alderson PG (eds) Plant tissue culture and its agricultural applications. Butterworths, London, pp 113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker WG (1953) A method for the in vitro culturing of potato tubers. Science 118:38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhital SP, Lim HT (2004) Microtuberization response in several genotypes of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by direct addition of liquid medium to in vitro plantlets. J Korean Society Hort Sci 45(6):281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada R, Tovar P, Dodds JH (1986) Introduction of in vitro tubers in a broad range of potato genotypes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 7:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner N, Blake J (1989) The induction and development of potato microtubers in vitro on medium free of growth regulating substances. Ann Bot 63:663–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal J, Minocha JL, Dhaliwal HS (1998) Microtuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Cell Rep 17:794–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvery BMR, Samuel HC, Enans NE, Selby C (1991) The use of growth retardants to improve microtuber formation by potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Cell Tissue & Organ Cult 27:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey G, Stacey NJ (1984) Factors affecting the formation of in vitro tubers of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ann Bot 53:565–578

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1990) SAS user’s guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamoorthy HN (1981) Plant growth substances, including applications in agriculture. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Le CL (1999) In vitro microtuberization: an evaluation of culture conditions for the production of virus-free seed potatoes. Potato Res 42(3/4):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lommen WJM, Struik PC (1994) Field performance of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and conventional seed tubers: crop establishment and yield formation. Potato Res 37:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz OA (1947) Potato nutrition III. Chemical composition and uptake of nutrients by kern country potatoes. Am Potato J 24:281–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCrown BH, Joyce PJ (1991) Automated propagation of microtubers of potato. In: Vasil IK (ed) Scale-up and automation in plant propagation. Academic, New York, pp 95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park KW, Kim YS (1999) Hydroponic in horticulture. Academic, Seoul, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli P, Bizarri M, Borghi L, Mari M (1994) Genotypic influence on in-vitro induction, dormancy length, advancing age and agronomical performance of potato microtubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ann Bot 125:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roca WM, Bryan JE, Roca MR (1979) Tissue culture for international transfer of potato genetic resources. Am Potato J 56:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell G, de Bertoldi FD, Tizio R (1987) In vitro mass tuberization as a contribution to potato micropropagation. Potato Res 30:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar D, Naik PS (1998) Effect of inorganic nitrogen nutrition on cytokinin-induced potato microtuber production in vitro. Potato Res 41(3):211–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith O (1975) Mineral nutrition of the potato. In: Smith O (ed) Potato: production storing and processing. The AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Alexandria, pp 183–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattimena GA (1983) Micropropagation as an alternative technology for potato production in Indonesia. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

  • Yu WC, Joyce PJ, Cameron DC, McCown BH (2000) Sucrose utilization during potato microtuber growth in bioreactors. Plant Cell Rep 19:407–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant given to Prof. Hak Tae Lim at the Center for Korea Potato Genetic Resources (KPGR), Kangwon National University from the Agricultural R&D Promotion Center, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea. We wish to thank Dr. S.L. Love, University of Idaho, USA and Dr. H.K. Manandhar, NARC, Nepal for their valuable efforts on reviewing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shambhu Prasad Dhital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhital, S.P., Lim, H.T. Microtuberization of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as Influenced by Supplementary Nutrients, Plant Growth Regulators, and In Vitro Culture Conditions. Potato Res. 55, 97–108 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-012-9212-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-012-9212-y

Keywords

Navigation