Skip to main content
Log in

Homogenization of a Directed Dispersal Model for Animal Movement in a Heterogeneous Environment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dispersal patterns of animals moving through heterogeneous environments have important ecological and epidemiological consequences. In this work, we apply the method of homogenization to analyze an advection–diffusion (AD) model of directed movement in a one-dimensional environment in which the scale of the heterogeneity is small relative to the spatial scale of interest. We show that the large (slow) scale behavior is described by a constant-coefficient diffusion equation under certain assumptions about the fast-scale advection velocity, and we determine a formula for the slow-scale diffusion coefficient in terms of the fast-scale parameters. We extend the homogenization result to predict invasion speeds for an advection–diffusion–reaction (ADR) model with directed dispersal. For periodic environments, the homogenization approximation of the solution of the AD model compares favorably with numerical simulations. Invasion speed approximations for the ADR model also compare favorably with numerical simulations when the spatial period is sufficiently small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armsworth PR, Bode L (1999) The consequences of non-passive advection and directed motion for population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond A 455:4045–4060

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Armsworth PR, Roughgarden JE (2005) The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. Am Nat 165:449–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks HT, Kareiva PM, Zia L (1988) Analyzing field studies of insect dispersal using two-dimensional transport equations. Env Entomol 17:815–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhirst S, Lutscher F (2009) Dispersal in heterogeneous habitats: thresholds, spatial scales, and approximate rates of spread. Ecology 90:1338–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon WE, Langlais M, Morgan J (2001) A mathematical model of the spread of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) through a highly heterogeneous spatial domain. SIAM J Math Anal 19:570–588

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garlick MJ, Powell JA, Hooten MB, MacFarlane LR (2011) Homogenization of large-scale movement models in ecology. Bull Math Biol 73:2088–2108

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garlick MJ, Powell JA, Hooten MB, MacFarlane LR (2013) Homogenization, sex, and differential motility predict spread of chronic wasting disease in mule deer in southern Utah. J Math Biol 69:369–399

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goudon T, Poupaud F (2004) Homogenization of transport equations: weak mean field approximation. SIAM J Math Anal 36(3):856–881

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goudon T, Poupaud F (2007) Homogenization of transport equations: a simple PDE approach to the Kubo formula. Bull Sci Math 131:72–88

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A, Cuddington K, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone A, Harrison S, Holland M, Lambrinos J, Malvadkar U, Melbourne BA, Moore K, Taylor C, Thomson D (2005) The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol Lett 8:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes EE, Lewis MA, Banks JE, Veit RR (1994) Partial differential equations in ecology: spatial interactions and population dynamics. Ecology 75:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes MH (2013) Introduction to perturbation methods. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jikov VV, Kozlov SM, Oleinik OA (1991) Homogenization of differential operators and integral functionals. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM (1983) Local movement in herbivorous insects: applying a passive diffusion model to mark-recapture field experiments. Oecologia 57:322–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki K, Shigesada N (2007) An integrodifference model for biological invasions in a periodically fragmented environment. Jpn J Ind Appl Math 24:3–15

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki K, Asano K, Shigesada N (2012) Impact of directed movement on invasive spread in periodic patchy environments. Bull Math Biol 74:1448–1467

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogoroff A, Petrovsky I, Piscounoff N (1937) Étude de l‘équation de la diffusion avec croissance de la quantité de matiére et son application á une probléme biologique. Moscow Univ Math Bull 1:1–25

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lutscher F, Lewis MA, McCauley E (2006) Effects of heterogeneity on spread and persistence in rivers. Bull Math Biol 68:2129–2160

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maciel GA, Lutscher F (2013) How individual movement response to habitat edges affects population persistence and spatial spread. Am Nat 182:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorcroft PR, Lewis MA (2006) Mechanistic home range analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert MG, Kot M, Lewis MA (1995) Dispersal and pattern formation in a discrete-time predator–prey model. Theor Pop Biol 48:7–43

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A, Levin SA (2001) Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS, Glass GE, Keesing F (2005) Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline. TRENDS Ecol Evol 20:328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patlak CS (1953) Random walk with persistence and external bias. Bull Math Biophys 15:311–338

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pavliotis GA, Stuart AM (2008) Multiscale methods: averaging and homogenization. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JA, Zimmermann NE (2004) Multiscale analysis of active seed dispersal contributes to resolving Reid’s paradox. Ecology 85:490–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roques L, Stoica RS (2007) Species persistence decreases with habitat fragmentation: an analysis in periodic stochastic environments. J Math Biol 55:189–205

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Teramoto E (1979) Spatial segregation of interacting species. J Theor Biol 79:83–99

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Teramoto E (1986) Traveling periodic waves in heterogeneous environments. Theor Popul Biol 30:143–160

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchiyama K (1978) The behavior of solutions of some nonlinear diffusion equations for large time. J Math Kyoto Univ 18:453–508

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kirk RW, Lewis M (1997) Integrodifference models for persistence in fragmented habitats. Bull Math Biol 59:107–137

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vergassola M, Avellaneda M (1997) Scalar transport in compressible flow. Physica D 106:148–166

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • With KA (2004) Assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes. Risk Anal 24:803–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Aaron Cinzori and K. Greg Murray for providing valuable discussion, and Michelle Yurk for assistance running numerical simulations. I also thank an anonymous reviewer for valuable feedback on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian P. Yurk.

Additional information

This work was supported by a Jacob E. Nyenhuis Faculty Development Grant from Hope College, funded by the Willard C. Wichers Faculty Development Fund.

Appendix: Homogenized Diffusion Coefficient for Periodic, Zero Mean Velocity

Appendix: Homogenized Diffusion Coefficient for Periodic, Zero Mean Velocity

We derive the simple formula (73) for the diffusion coefficient (28) in the case that the advection velocity u is periodic (29) with zero mean (30). These two conditions imply that I and its reciprocal, \(I^{-1}\) are also periodic with period \(2\ell \),

$$\begin{aligned} I(y+2\ell )=I(y). \end{aligned}$$
(53)

For convenience, we set the lower limits of integration to \(y_0=-\ell \) in the definitions of I, \(\gamma \), and \(\alpha \) (5, 14, 24).

From the definition of \(\alpha \) (24),

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha (y)=\int _{-\ell }^yI(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s. \end{aligned}$$
(54)

Since we are interested in the limit as \(y\rightarrow \infty \) in (28), we may assume that \(y>0\) in what follows. In this case, \(\alpha \) can be expressed as the sum

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha (y)=\int _{(2m-1)\ell }^{y}I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s+\sum _{i=0}^{m-1}\int _{(2i-1)\ell }^{(2i+1)\ell }I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s, \end{aligned}$$
(55)

where m is chosen so that

$$\begin{aligned} (2m-1)\ell \le y < (2m+1)\ell . \end{aligned}$$
(56)

Since \(I^{-1}\) is periodic with period \(2\ell \), each of last m terms on the right-hand side of (55) are equal to \(\int _{-\ell }^{\ell } I^{-1}(s)\,\hbox {d}s\). Consequently,

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha (y)=m\int _{-\ell }^{\ell } I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s+\int _{(2m-1)\ell }^{y}I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s. \end{aligned}$$
(57)

Now, we turn our attention to the integral in the denominator of (28). Similar to above, we express the integral as the sum

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{-\ell }^{y}I(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s=\int _{(2n-1)\ell }^{y}I(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s+\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}\int _{(2i-1)\ell }^{(2i+1)\ell }I(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s, \end{aligned}$$
(58)

where n is chosen so that

$$\begin{aligned} (2n-1)\ell \le y < (2n+1)\ell . \end{aligned}$$
(59)

We will develop bounds for the last n terms on the right-hand side of (58). The limits of integration of these integrals restrict the relevant values of s, so that \(\alpha (s)\) needs only to be considered for \((2i-1)\ell \le s<(2i+1)\ell \). Thus, according to (57) and (56), these integrals can be rewritten as,

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{(2i-1)\ell }^{(2i+1)\ell }I(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s= & {} i\left( \int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s\right) \left( \int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)\,\hbox {d}s\right) \nonumber \\&+\int _{(2i-1)\ell }^{2(i+1)\ell }I(s)\left( \int _{(2i-1)\ell }^sI(w)^{-1}\,dw\right) \,\hbox {d}s. \end{aligned}$$
(60)

Because I and \(I^{-1}\) are positive, the double-integral on the right-hand side of Eq. (60) must also be positive. Furthermore, the assumption (6) implies that \(I(s)\le I_M\) and \(I^{-1}(s)\le (I_m)^{-1}\), for all \(s\in \mathbb {R}^1\), where \(I_M\) and \(I_m\) are fixed positive real numbers. Consequently,

$$\begin{aligned} 0<\int _{(2i-1)\ell }^{2(i+1)\ell }I(s)\left( \int _{(2i-1)\ell }^sI(w)^{-1}\,dw\right) \,\hbox {d}s\le (2\ell )^2\frac{I_M}{I_m}. \end{aligned}$$
(61)

Next, we develop bounds for the first term on the right-hand side of Eq. (58). First, note that since \(\alpha (s)\) is a positive, increasing function and \(y\ge (2n-1)\ell \),

$$\begin{aligned} 0\le \int _{(2n-1)\ell }^y\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s\le \alpha (y)[y-(2n-1)\ell ]. \end{aligned}$$
(62)

Inequality (59) also implies that

$$\begin{aligned} y-(2n-1)\ell \le 2\ell . \end{aligned}$$
(63)

The two preceding inequalities, along with (6) result in the following bound:

$$\begin{aligned} 0\le \int _{(2n-1)\ell }^yI(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s\le 2\ell I_M\alpha (y) \end{aligned}$$
(64)

Using inequalities (61) and (64) and equations (58) and (60), we arrive at the upper bound

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{-\ell }^{y}I(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s\le & {} \left( \frac{(n-1)n}{2}\right) \left( \int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s\right) \left( \int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)\,\hbox {d}s\right) \nonumber \\&+\,2\ell I_M\alpha (y) + (2\ell )^2\frac{I_M}{I_m}, \end{aligned}$$
(65)

and the lower bound

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{-\ell }^{y}I(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s \ge \left( \frac{(n-1)n}{2}\right) \left( \int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s\right) \left( \int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)\,\hbox {d}s\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(66)

Inequality (59) implies that

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{y-2\ell }{2\ell }<n\le \frac{y}{2\ell }. \end{aligned}$$
(67)

Consequently,

$$\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{(n-1)n}{2}\right) =\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{y}{2\ell }\right) ^2+O(y^1), \end{aligned}$$
(68)

as \(y\rightarrow \infty \). Furthermore, the last two terms on the right-hand side of the upper bound (65) satisfy

$$\begin{aligned} 2\ell _M\alpha (y)=O(y^1), \end{aligned}$$
(69)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \left( 2\ell \right) ^2\frac{I_M}{I_m}=O(y^0). \end{aligned}$$
(70)

Finally, we evaluate the limit

$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{y\rightarrow \infty }\frac{\int _{\ell }^{y}I(s)\alpha (s)\,\hbox {d}s}{y^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(71)

which arises in the formula for the diffusion coefficient (28). Note that if the right-hand side of the upper bound (65) is divided by \(y^2\), and the limit taken as \(y\rightarrow \infty \), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{\int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s}{2\ell }\right) \left( \frac{\int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)\,\hbox {d}s}{2\ell }\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(72)

due to (6870). The same limit is obtained if the right-hand side of the lower bound (66) is divided by \(y^2\). Thus, by the Squeeze Theorem, the limit (71) is given by the expression (72). Consequently, from this limit and Eq.  (28), we can conclude that the slow-scale diffusion coefficient for a periodic, zero-mean velocity is simply

$$\begin{aligned} D=\frac{\eta }{I_\mathrm{av}I^{-1}_\mathrm{av}}, \end{aligned}$$
(73)

where \(I_{av}\) is the average value of I,

$$\begin{aligned} I_{av}=\frac{\int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)\,\hbox {d}s}{2\ell }, \end{aligned}$$
(74)

and \(I^{-1}_\mathrm{av}\) is the average value of \(I^{-1}\),

$$\begin{aligned} I^{-1}_{av}=\frac{\int _{-\ell }^{\ell }I(s)^{-1}\,\hbox {d}s}{2\ell }. \end{aligned}$$
(75)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yurk, B.P. Homogenization of a Directed Dispersal Model for Animal Movement in a Heterogeneous Environment. Bull Math Biol 78, 2034–2056 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-016-0210-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-016-0210-0

Keywords

Navigation