Abstract
The mechanical behavior of the actin cytoskeleton has previously been investigated using both experimental and computational techniques. However, these investigations have not elucidated the role the cytoskeleton plays in the compression resistance of cells. The present study combines experimental compression techniques with active modeling of the cell’s actin cytoskeleton. A modified atomic force microscope is used to perform whole cell compression of osteoblasts. Compression tests are also performed on cells following the inhibition of the cell actin cytoskeleton using cytochalasin-D. An active bio-chemo-mechanical model is employed to predict the active remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. The model incorporates the myosin driven contractility of stress fibers via a muscle-like constitutive law. The passive mechanical properties, in parallel with active stress fiber contractility parameters, are determined for osteoblasts. Simulations reveal that the computational framework is capable of predicting changes in cell morphology and increased resistance to cell compression due to the contractility of the actin cytoskeleton. It is demonstrated that osteoblasts are highly contractile and that significant changes to the cell and nucleus geometries occur when stress fiber contractility is removed.
References
Avalos, P. G., Reichenzeller, M., Eils, R., & Gladilin, E. (2011). Probing compressibility of the nuclear interior in wild-type and lamin deficient cells using microscopic imaging and computational modeling. J. Biomech., 44(15), 2642–2648.
Broers, J. L. V., Peeters, E. A. G., Kuijpers, H. J. H., Endert, J., Bouten, C. V. C., Oomens, C. W. J., Baaijens, F. P. T., & Ramaekers, F. C. S. (2004). Decreased mechanical stiffness in lmna–/– cells is caused by defective nucleo-cytoskeletal integrity: implications for the development of laminopathies. Hum. Mol. Genet., 13(21), 2567–2580.
Butt, H. J., & Jaschke, M. (1995). Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology, 6(1), 1–7.
Caille, N., Thoumine, O., Tardy, Y., & Meister, J. J. (2002). Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J. Biomech., 35(2), 177–187.
Chancellor, T., Lee, J., Thodeti, C. K., & Lele, T. (2010). Actomyosin tension exerted on the nucleus through nesprin-1 connections influences endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and cyclic strain-induced reorientation. Biophys. J., 99(1), 115–123.
Cleveland, J. P., Manne, S., Bocek, D., & Hansma, P. K. (1993). A nondestructive method for determining the spring constant of cantilevers for scanning force microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 64(2), 403–405.
Darling, E. M., Topel, M., Zauscher, S., Vail, T. P., & Guilak, F. (2008). Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J. Biomech., 41(2), 454–464.
Deng, Z., Lulevich, V., Liu, F.-t., & Liu, G.-y. (2010). Applications of atomic force microscopy in biophysical chemistry of cells. J. Phys. Chem. B, 114(18), 5971–5982.
Deshpande, V. S., McMeeking, R. M., & Evans, A. G. (2006). A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 103(38), 14015–14020.
Deshpande, V. S., McMeeking, R. M., & Evans, A. G. (2007). A model for the contractility of the cytoskeleton including the effects of stress-fibre formation and dissociation. Proc. R. Soc. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 463(2079), 787–815.
Dowling, E. P., Ronan, W., Ofek, G., Deshpande, V. S., Athanasiou, K. A., McMeeking, R. M., & McGarry, J. P. (2012). The effect of remodelling and contractility of the actin cytoskeleton on the shear resistance of single cells: a computational and experimental investigation. J. R. Soc. Interface, 9(77), 3469–3479.
Duncan, R., & Turner, C. (1995). Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif. Tissue Int., 57(5), 344–358.
Franke, R. P., Grafe, M., Schnittler, H., Seiffge, D., Mittermayer, C., & Drenckhahn, D. (1984). Induction of human vascular endothelial stress fibres by fluid shear stress. Nature, 307(5952), 648–649.
Frost, H. M. (2004). A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians. Angle Orthod., 74(1), 3–15.
Gabbay, J. S., Zuk, P. A., Tahernia, A., Askari, M., O’Hara, C. M., Karthikeyan, T., Azari, K., Hollinger, J. O., & Bradley, J. P. (2006). In vitro microdistraction of preosteoblasts: distraction promotes proliferation and oscillation promotes differentiation. Tissue Eng., 12(11), 3055–3065.
Guilak, F., & Mow, V. C. (2000). The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J. Biomech., 33(12), 1663–1673.
Guilak, F., Tedrow, J. R., & Burgkart, R. (2000). Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 269(3), 781–786.
Haider, M. A., & Guilak, F. (2002). An axisymmetric boundary integral model for assessing elastic cell properties in the micropipette aspiration contact problem. J. Biomech. Eng., 124(5), 586–595.
Higuchi, C., Nakamura, N., Yoshikawa, H., & Itoh, K. (2009). Transient dynamic actin cytoskeletal change stimulates the osteoblastic differentiation. J. Bone Miner. Metab., 27(2), 158–167.
Hofmann, U. G., Rotsch, C., Parak, W. J., & Radmacher, M. (1997). Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope. J. Struct. Biol., 119(2), 84–91.
Houben, F., Ramaekers, F. C. S., Snoeckx, L. H. E. H., & Broers, J. L. V. (2007). Role of nuclear lamina-cytoskeleton interactions in the maintenance of cellular strength. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res., 1773(5), 675–686.
Kelly, G. M., Kilpatrick, J. I., van Es, M. H., Weafer, P. P., Prendergast, P. J., & Jarvis, S. P. (2011). Bone cell elasticity and morphology changes during the cell cycle. J. Biomech., 44(8), 1484–1490.
Khatau, S. B., Hale, C. M., Stewart-Hutchinson, P. J., Patel, M. S., Stewart, C. L., Searson, P. C., Hodzic, D., & Wirtz, D. (2009). A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106(45), 19017–19022.
Kolega, J. (1986). Effects of mechanical tension on protrusive activity and microfilament and intermediate filament organization in an epidermal epithelium moving in culture. J. Cell Biol., 102(4), 1400–1411.
Lulevich, V., Zink, T., Chen, H.-Y., Liu, F.-T., & Liu, G.-y. (2006). Cell mechanics using atomic force microscopy-based single-cell compression. Langmuir, 22(19), 8151–8155.
McGarry, J. P. (2009). Characterization of cell mechanical properties by computational modeling of parallel plate compression. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 37(11), 2317–2325.
McGarry, J. P., & McHugh, P. E. (2008). Modelling of in vitro chondrocyte detachment. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 56(4), 1554–1565.
McGarry, J. P., Murphy, B. P., & McHugh, P. E. (2005). Computational mechanics modelling of cell-substrate contact during cyclic substrate deformation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 53(12), 2597–2637.
McGarry, J. G., Maguire, P., Campbell, V. A., O’Connell, B. C., Prendergast, P. J., & Jarvis, S. P. (2008). Stimulation of nitric oxide mechanotransduction in single osteoblasts using atomic force microscopy. J. Orthop. Res., 26(4), 513–521.
McGarry, J. P., Fu, J., Yang, M. T., Chen, C. S., McMeeking, R. M., Evans, A. G., & Deshpande, V. S. (2009). Simulation of the contractile response of cells on an array of micro-posts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 367(1902), 3477–3497.
Mohrdieck, C., Wanner, A., Roos, W., Roth, A., Sackmann, E., Spatz, J. P., & Arzt, E. (2005). A theoretical description of elastic pillar substrates in biophysical experiments. ChemPhysChem, 6(8), 1492–1498.
Ofek, G., Natoli, R. M., & Athanasiou, K. A. (2009a). In situ mechanical properties of the chondrocyte cytoplasm and nucleus. J. Biomech., 42(7), 873–877.
Ofek, G., Wiltz, D. C., & Athanasiou, K. A. (2009b). Contribution of the cytoskeleton to the compressive properties and recovery behavior of single cells. Biophys. J., 97(7), 1873–1882.
Owan, I., Burr, D. B., Turner, C. H., Qiu, J., Tu, Y., Onyia, J. E., & Duncan, R. L. (1997). Mechanotransduction in bone: osteoblasts are more responsive to fluid forces than mechanical strain. Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol., 273(3), C810–C815.
Pathak, A., Deshpande, V. S., McMeeking, R. M., & Evans, A. G. (2008). The simulation of stress fibre and focal adhesion development in cells on patterned substrates. J. R. Soc. Interface, 5(22), 507–524.
Peeters, E. A., Oomens, C. W., Bouten, C. V., Bader, D. L., & Baaijens, F. P. (2005a). Viscoelastic properties of single attached cells under compression. J. Biomech. Eng., 127(2), 237–243.
Peeters, E. A., Oomens, C. W., Bouten, C. V., Bader, D. L., & Baaijens, F. P. (2005b). Mechanical and failure properties of single attached cells under compression. J. Biomech., 38(8), 1685–1693.
Rath, B., Nam, J., Knobloch, T. J., Lannutti, J. J., & Agarwal, S. (2008). Compressive forces induce osteogenic gene expression in calvarial osteoblasts. J. Biomech., 41(5), 1095–1103.
Ronan, W., Deshpande, V. S., McMeeking, R. M., & McGarry, J. P. (2011). Simulation of stress fiber remodeling and mixed mode focal adhesion assembly during cell spreading and for cells adhered to elastic substrates. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 summer bioengineering conference, SBC2011-53878, Farmington, PA, USA.
Ronan, W., Deshpande, V. S., McMeeking, R. M., & McGarry, J. P. (2012). Numerical investigation of the active role of the actin cytoskeleton in the compression resistance of cells. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 14, 143–157.
Rotsch, C., & Radmacher, M. (2000). Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys. J., 78(1), 520–535.
Rowat, A. C., Foster, L. J., Nielsen, M. M., Weiss, M., & Ipsen, J. H. (2005). Characterization of the elastic properties of the nuclear envelope. J. R. Soc. Interface, 2(2), 63–69.
Shieh, A. C., & Athanasiou, K. A. (2007). Dynamic compression of single cells. Osteoarthr. Cartil., 15(3), 328–334.
Storm, C., Pastore, J. J., MacKintosh, F. C., Lubensky, T. C., & Janmey, P. A. (2005). Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature, 435(7039), 191–194.
Thoumine, O., Cardoso, O., & Meister, J. J. (1999). Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study. Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett., 28(3), 222–234.
Warshaw, D. M., Desrosiers, J. M., Work, S. S., & Trybus, K. M. (1990). Smooth muscle myosin cross-bridge interactions modulate actin filament sliding velocity in vitro. J. Cell Biol., 111(2), 453–463.
Weafer, P., McGarry, J., van Es, M., Kilpatrick, J., Ronan, W., Nolan, D., & Jarvis, S. (2012). Stability enhancement of an atomic force microscope for long-term force measurement including cantilever modification for whole cell deformation. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 83(9), 093709.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland (Grant No. 08/RFP/ENM1726), the Irish Research Council for Science and Engineering Technology, and the Irish Centre for High End Computing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
P.P. Weafer and W. Ronan are joint first authors.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weafer, P.P., Ronan, W., Jarvis, S.P. et al. Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Role of Stress Fiber Contractility in the Resistance of Osteoblasts to Compression. Bull Math Biol 75, 1284–1303 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-013-9812-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-013-9812-y