Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bards, Poets, and Cliques: Frequency-Dependent Selection and the Evolution of Language Genes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of humans to communicate via language is a complex, adapted phenotype, which undoubtedly has a recently evolved genetic component. However, the evolutionary dynamics of language-associated alleles are poorly understood. To improve our knowledge of such systems, a population-genetics model for language-associated genes is developed. (The model is general and applicable to social interactions other than communication.) When an allele arises that potentially improves the ability of individuals to communicate, it will experience positive frequency-dependent selection because its fitness will depend on how many other individuals communicate the same way. Consequently, new and rare alleles are selected against, posing a problem for the evolutionary origin of language. However, the model shows that if individuals form language-based cliques, then novel language-associated alleles can sweep through a population. Thus, the origin of language ability can be sufficiently explained by Darwinian processes operating on genetic diversity in a finite population of human ancestors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asmussen, M. A., & Basnayake, E. (1990). Frequency-dependent selection: the high potential for permanent genetic variation in the diallelic, pairwise interaction model. Genetics, 125, 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen, M. A., Cartwright, R. A., & Spencer, H. G. (2004). Frequency-dependent selection with dominance: a window onto the behavior of the mean fitness. Genetics, 167, 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighton, H. (2002). Compositional syntax from cultural transmission. Artif. Life, 8, 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1983). Paradox of the evolution of communication and of social interactivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 2017–2021.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009). Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 1015–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behav. Brain Sci., 31, 489–508; discussion 509–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. G., Glanowski, S., Nielsen, R., Thomas, P. D., Kejariwal, A., Todd, M. A., Tanenbaum, D. M., Civello, D., Lu, F., Murphy, B., Ferriera, S., Wang, G., Zheng, X., White, T. J., Sninsky, J. J., Adams, M. D., & Cargill, M. (2003). Inferring nonneutral evolution from human-chimp-mouse orthologous gene trios. Science, 302, 1960–1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coop, G., Bullaughey, K., Luca, F., & Przeworski, M. (2008). The timing of selection at the human FOXP2 gene. Mol. Biol. Evol., 25, 1257–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corballis, M. C. (2009). The evolution of language. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1156, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. A., Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1997). Perspective: a critique of Sewall Wright’s shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution, 51, 643–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dediu, D., & Ladd, D. R. (2007). Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, aspm and microcephalin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 10944–10949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S. E., Lai, C. S. L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A. P., & Pääbo, S. (2002). Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature, 418, 869–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci., 32, 429–448; discussion 448–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. E., & Scharff, C. (2009). Foxp2 as a molecular window into speech and language. Trends Genet., 25, 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. E., Vargha-Khadem, F., Watkins, K. E., Monaco, A. P., & Pembrey, M. E. (1998). Localisation of a gene implicated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nat. Genet., 18, 168–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2010). Greenbeards. Evolution, 64, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S., & Lewontin, R. (1979). Spandrels of San-Marco and the Panglossian paradigm—a critique of the adaptationist program. Proc. Biol. Sci., 205, 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort, P. (2005). On broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci., 9, 416–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1975). Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. In R. Fox (Ed.), ASA studies 4: biosocial anthropology (pp. 133–153). London: Malaby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2004). The disadvantage of combinatorial communication. Proc. Biol. Sci., 271, 2337–2343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. S., Fisher, S. E., Hurst, J. A., Vargha-Khadem, F., & Monaco, A. P. (2001). A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature, 413, 519–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Prugnolle, F., Manica, A., & Balloux, F. (2006). A geographically explicit genetic model of worldwide human-settlement history. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 79, 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, T., Mikami, A., Suzuki, J., & Matsuzawa, T. (2006). Descent of the hyoid in chimpanzees: evolution of face flattening and speech. J. Hum. Evol., 51, 244–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Krakauer, D. C. (1999). The evolution of language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 8028–8033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., Plotkin, J. B., & Jansen, V. A. (2000). The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature, 404, 495–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behav. Brain Sci., 13, 707–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition, 95, 201–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci., 21, 188–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2004). The evolution of vocabulary. J. Theor. Biol., 228, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Kirby, S. (2008). Cultural evolution: implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 363, 3591–3603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Brighton, H., & Kirby, S. (2003). Complex systems in language evolution: the cultural emergence of compositional structure. Adv. Complex Syst., 6, 537–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargha-Khadem, F., Watkins, K., Alcock, K., Fletcher, P., & Passingham, R. (1995). Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 930–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Humboldt, W. (1836). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaus und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Bonn: Dummlers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, M. C., & Phillips, P. C. (2000). The exquisite corpse: a shifting view of the shifting balance. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 347–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., & Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Group selection and assortative interactions. Am. Nat., 149, 336–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, A. (1998). Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction. Lang. Commun., 18, 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Houston, 369 Science & Research Bldg 2, Houston, TX, 77204-5001, USA

    Reed A. Cartwright

Authors
  1. Reed A. Cartwright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reed A. Cartwright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cartwright, R.A. Bards, Poets, and Cliques: Frequency-Dependent Selection and the Evolution of Language Genes. Bull Math Biol 73, 2201–2212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9619-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9619-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation