Abstract
For a system of biochemical reactions, it is known from the work of T.G. Kurtz [J. Appl. Prob. 8, 344 (1971)] that the chemical master equation model based on a stochastic formulation approaches the deterministic model based on the Law of Mass Action in the infinite system-size limit in finite time. The two models, however, often show distinctly different steady-state behavior. To further investigate this “paradox,” a comparative study of the deterministic and stochastic models of a simple autocatalytic biochemical reaction, taken from a text by the late J. Keizer, is carried out. We compute the expected time to extinction, the true stochastic steady state, and a quasistationary probability distribution in the stochastic model. We show that the stochastic model predicts the deterministic behavior on a reasonable time scale, which can be consistently obtained from both models. The transition time to the extinction, however, grows exponentially with the system size. Mathematically, we identify that exchanging the limits of infinite system size and infinite time is problematic. The appropriate system size that can be considered sufficiently large, an important parameter in numerical computation, is also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, L.J.S., 2003. An Introduction to Stochastic Processes with Applications to Biology. Pearson Education.
Ashih, A.C.W., 2001. Spatial and stochastic models for population growth with sexual and asexual reproduction, Ph.D. Thesis, Duke University.
Baras, F., Mansour, M.M., Pearson, J.E., 1996. Microscopic simulation of chemical bistability in homogeneous systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 8257–8261.
Chung, K.-L., 1967. Markov Chains with Stationary Transition Probabilities. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Courant R., Hilbert, D., 1952. Methods of Mathematical Physics. Interscience Pub., New York.
Epstein, I.R., Pojman, J.A., 1998. An Introduction to Nonlinear Chemical Dynamics: Oscillations, Waves, Patterns, and Chaos. Oxford University Press.
Ethier, S.N., Kurtz, T.G., 1986. Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Érdi, P., Tóth, J., 1989. Mathematical Models of Chemical Reactions: Theory and Applications of Deterministic and Stochastic Models. Manchester University Press.
Gillespie, D., 1976. General method for numerically simulating stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comput. Phys. 22, 403–434.
Gillespie, D., 1977. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340–2361.
Grasman, J., van Herwaarden, O.A., 1999. Asymptotic Methods for the Fokker-Planck equation and the Exit Problem in Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hänggi, H.G., Talkner, P., Thomas, H., 1984. Bistable systems: master equation versus Fokker-Planck modeling. Phys. Rev. A. 29, 371–378.
Heuett, W.J., Qian, H., 2006. Grand canonical Markov model: a stochastic theory for open nonequilibrium biochemical networks. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 044110.
Keizer, J., 1987. Statistical Thermodynamics of Nonequilibrium Processes. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Kurtz, T.G., 1971. Limit theorems for sequences of jump Markov processes approximating ordinary differential equations. J. Appl. Prob. 8, 344–356.
Kurtz, T.G. (1972. The relationship between stochastic and deterministic models for chemical reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 57, 2976–2978.
Leontovich, M.A., 1935. Basic equations of the kinetic gas theory from the point of view of the theory of random processes (in Russian). Zh. Teoret. Ehksper. Fiz. 5, 211–231.
Luo, J.-L., Van der Broeck, C., Nicolis, G., 1984. Stability criteria and fluctuations around nonequilibrium states. Z. Phys. B. Cond. Matt. 56, 165–170.
McAdams, H.H., Arkin, A., 1999. It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet. 15, 65–69.
McQuarrie, D.A., 1967. Stochastic approach to chemical kinetics. J. Appl. Prob. 4, 413–478.
Murray, J.D., 2002. Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction, 3rd Ed. Springer, New York.
Nasell, I., 2001. Extinction and quasi-stationarity in the Verhulst logistic model, J. Theor. Biol. 211, 11–27.
Noyes, R.M., Field, R.J., 1974. Oscillatory chemical reactions. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 25, 95–119.
Paulsson, J., Berg, O.G., Ehrenberg, M., 2000. Stochastic focusing: Fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7148–7153.
Qian, H., Reluga, T.C., 2005. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and nonlinear kinetics in a cellular signaling switch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 028101.
Qian, H., Saffarian, S., Elson, E. L., 2002, Concentration fluctuations in a mesoscopic oscillation chemical reaction system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10376–10381.
Reddy, V.T.N., 1975. On the existence of the steady state in the stochastic Volterra-Lotka model. J. Stat. Phys. 13, 61–64.
Samoilov, M., Plyasunov, S., Arkin, A.P., 2005, Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2310–2315.
Schnakenberg, J., 1976. Network theory of microscopic and macroscopic behavior of master equation systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 571–585.
Sipos, T., Tóth, J., Érdi, P., 1974a. Stochastic simulation of complex chemical reactions by digital computer, I. The model. Reaction Kinetics Catalysis Lett. 1, 113–117.
Sipos, T., Tóth, J., Érdi, P., 1974b. Stochastic simulation of complex chemical reactions by digital computer, II. Applications. Reaction Kinetics Catalysis Lett. 1, 209–213.
Smolen, P., Baxter, D.A., Byrne, J.H., 2000. Modeling transcriptional control in gene networks — methods, recent results, and future directions. Bull. Math. Biol. 62, 247–292.
Srivastava, R., You, L., Summers, J., Yin, J., 2002. Stochastic vs. deterministic modeling of intracellular viral kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 309–321.
Taylor, H.M., Karlin, S., 1998. An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling, 3rd Ed. Academic Press, New York.
Turner, T.E., Schnell, S., Burrage, K., 2004. Stochastic approaches for modeling in vivo reactions. Comput. Biol. Chem. 28, 165–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vellela, M., Qian, H. A Quasistationary Analysis of a Stochastic Chemical Reaction: Keizer’s Paradox. Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 1727–1746 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9188-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9188-3