Promoting Formative Assessment in Online Teaching and Learning
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Using effective assessment techniques can improve an instructor’s understanding of student needs and support learner-centered classrooms. Evaluating student learning takes on a new meaning in online classroom environment where students and instructors do not share physical proximity. According to Garrison (2011), the assessment strategies used to determine student learning send “a very strong signal as to what is important and how they should approach learning” (p. 14). This paper describes formative assessment techniques used by two instructors in their respective online courses at the graduate level. The authors give suggestions in designing assessment activities to improve online teaching and learning by making use of student learning data.
- Angelo, T.A., & Cross, P.K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: a handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Beebe, R., Vonderwell, S., & Boboc, M. (2010). Emerging patterns in transferring assessment practices from face-toface to online environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, (8)1.
- Benson, A. D. (2003). Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 69–78. CrossRef
- Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment, Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148.
- Black, P., & William, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In Wilson, M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (pp. 20–50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals - Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
- Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(9). Retrieved May 10, 2012 from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=9
- Chase, C. I. (1999). Contemporary assessment for educators. New York, NY: Longman.
- Clark, M. (2000). Getting participation through discussion. In S. Haller (Ed.), ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education SIGCSE’00, 32(1), 129–133. New York: ACM Press. CrossRef
- Crisp, V., & Ward, C. (2008). The development of a formative scenario-based computer assisted assessment tool in psychology for teachers: The PePCAA project. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1509–1526. CrossRef
- Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243–256. CrossRef
- Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Herron, J. F., & Wright, V. H. (2006). Assessment in online learning: Are students really learning? In Wright, H.V., Syzmanski Sunal, C., & Wilson, E. K. (Eds.) Research on enhancing the interactivity of online learning (pp. 45–64). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
- Liang, X., & Creasy, K. (2004). Classroom assessment in web-based instructional environment: Instructors’ experience. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(7). Retrieved May 2, 2012 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=7
- Mandinach, E. B. (2005). The development of effective evaluation methods for elearning: A concept paper and action plan. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1814–1835. CrossRef
- Manning, M. L., & Bucher, K. T. (2005). Teaching in the middle school (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Mosteller, F. (1989). The muddiest point in the lecture’ as a feedback device. On Teaching and Learning: The Journal of the Harvard-Danforth Center, 3, 10–21.
- Nelson-LeGall, S. (1981). Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review, 1, 224–226. CrossRef
- Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help-seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 283–301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Popham, W. J. (2002). Classroom assessment - What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Powell, Davis S. (2005). Introduction to middle school. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R.B., & Wilson, V. (2006). Measurement and assessment in education. Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Vonderwell, S. (2004). Assessing online learning and teaching: Adapting the Minute Paper. TechTrends, 48(4), 29–31. CrossRef
- Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213–230.
- Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328.
- Wilen, W., Hutchinson, J., & Ishler, M. (2008). Dynamics of effective secondary teaching. (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson
- Promoting Formative Assessment in Online Teaching and Learning
Volume 57, Issue 4 , pp 22-27
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Formative Assessment
- Assessment for Learning
- Online Learning