Anderson, C. A. (1983). Computer literacy: Changes for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34
(5), 6–9.Google Scholar
Barron, A. E., Hogarty, K. Y., Kromrey, J. D., & Lenkway, P. (1999). An examination of the relationships between student conduct and the number of computers per student in Florida schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32
(1), 98–107.Google Scholar
Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C., & Vannatta, R. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9
, 105–127.Google Scholar
Boccia, J. (2003). Ready To Teach (RTT) project final report. Lowell, MA: University of Massachusetts at Lowell.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods
. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school
(expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M. H., Stock, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology into a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51
(1), 57–72.Google Scholar
Claxton, D., & Bedford, J. (2003). East Central University PT3 project annual report. Ada, OK: East Central University, School of Education and Psychology.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies
. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
CognitionandTechnologyGroupatVanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DePaepe, J. (2005). Enhancing the technological proficiencies of educators though community-based research
. Ellensburg, WA: Central Washington University, College of Education and Professional Studies.Google Scholar
Diggs, L, Laffey, J., Wedman, J., & Marra, R. (2001). University of Missouri PT3 project final report. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.
Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42
(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47
(4), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, C., Culatta, R., Pratt, M., & West, R. (2004). Redesigning the teacher education technology course to emphasize integration. Computers in the Schools, 21
, 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40
(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howland, J., & Wedman, J. (2004). A process model for faculty development: Individualized technology learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 239–263.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2000a). National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETSS)
. Eugene, OR: Author.Google Scholar
International Society for Technology in Education. (2000b). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETST)
. Eugene, OR: Author.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. (2005). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology: Final performance report. Plano, TX: Collin County Community College.
Jonas, R. (2004). The University of Mary PT3 Project final report. Bismarck, ND: The University of Mary.
Jones, D. L., & Paolucci, R. (1999). Research framework and dimensions for evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology systems on learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32
(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
Krueger, K., Boboc, M., Smaldino, S., Cornish, Y., & Callahan, W. (2004). InTime impact report: What was InTime’s effectiveness and impact on faculty and preservice teachers? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 185–210.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Lowther, D. L., Bassoppo-Moya, T., & Morrison, G. R. (1998). Moving from computer literate to technologically competent: The next educational reform. Computers in Human Behavior, 14
(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, M., & Booz, W. H. (2001). Teacher technology leaders. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Department of Teacher Preparation and Special Education.
Ludwig, M, & Booz, W. H. (2002). Teacher technology leaders. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Department of Teacher Preparation and Special Education.
Mills, S. (2003). Pittsburg State University PT3 project final report. Pittsburg, KS: Pittsburg State University.
Millken Family Foundation (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality
. Princeton, NJ: ETS.Google Scholar
Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (Eds.). (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.
National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT). (2000). Revisioning professional development: What learner-centered professional development looks like
. Oxford, OH: Author.Google Scholar
Nave, B. (2004). Boston University Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers for Technology (BUPT3): Final summative report. Boston, MA: Boston University, School of Education.
Norris, C., Smolka, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Extracting value from research: A guide for the perplexed. Technology & Learning, 20
(11), 45–48.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers & technology: Making the connection Washington, DC: U.S. Congress. (ERIC Document OTA-EHR-616)
Paige, J. R. (2004). St. Edward’s University PT3 project final report. Austin, TX: St. Edward’s University.
Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
Persichitte, K. A., Tharp, D. D., & Caffarella, E. P. (1997). The use of technology by schools, colleges, and departments of education: Fall, 1996
. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teaching? Educational Researcher, 29
(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resta, P. E., Petrosino, A., & Confrey, J. (2004). Inventing new strategies for integrating technology into education: Project INSITE evaluation report. Austin, TX: University of Texas–Austin.
Salinas, S. E. (2000, April). Exploring motivational factors in technology standards integration with a preservice educator: An action research inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1995). Engines for education
. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schrum, L. (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47
(4), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, S. S., & Millar, D. (2003). Saginaw Valley State University PT3 Project final report. Saginaw, MI: Saginaw Valley State University.
Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D., & Weiss, R. (2003). Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51
(3), 41–56.Google Scholar
Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D. & Weiss, R. (2004). Final report for Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Las Vegas, NE: University of Nevada–Las Vegas.
Swain, C., & Dawson, K. (2003). The University of Florida Teaching and Technology Initiative (UFTTI) PT3 implementation grant final report. Gainesville, FL: The University of Florida.
Tiene, D., & Luft, P. (2001). Teaching in a technology-rich classroom. Educational Leadership, 41
(4), 23–31.Google Scholar
United States Department of Education (USDoE) (2004). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology
. Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://www.pt3.org
Vetter, R., Sologuk, S., & Stammen, R. (2001). A collaborative approach for creating curriculum and instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9
(2), 199–210.Google Scholar
Waddoups, G. L., Wentworth, N., & Earle, R. (2004). Principles of technology integration and curriculum development: A faculty design team approach. Computers in the Schools, 21
, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, I. (1997). From internet user to cyberspace citizen. Educom Review, 32
, 46–55.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2002). When technology meets beliefs: Preservice teachers’ perception of the teacher’s role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Teacher Education, 35
, 150–161.Google Scholar
Wentworth, N., Waddoups, G. L., & Earle, R. (2004). Technology integration into a teacher education program. Computers in the Schools, 21
, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar