Abstract
Cross-linguistic comparisons of compounds are difficult because of the varied criteria and terms used by different linguists (Scalise and Bisetto 2009). To address this problem, Scalise and Bisetto proposed a universal three-level classification of compound types. Although several researchers have shown that American Sign Language (ASL) has compound signs, a classification of compound types in ASL has not been completed. All of the potential compounds in an ASL dictionary (Costello 1994) were identified, then verified as compounds with the help of a fluent deaf signer by applying standard tests for composition. These compounds were then classified using the Scalise and Bisetto classification. We found that Scalise and Bisetto’s three-level hierarchical classification successfully captured cross-category relationships among subtypes of compounds but fails to predict the existence of one type of compound attested in ASL. In our revised classification, a consistent set of criteria is used at each level, resulting in a classification that is both conceptually simpler and empirically more adequate. The second tier category for hierarchical compounds are bifurcated into the categories expressed predicate and unexpressed predicate, according to whether each predicate in a compound’s semantic structure is expressed by one of the overt constituents. The revision has the further advantage of allowing us to avoid any reference to word class/grammatical category in applying our taxonomy, a goal that we show to be desirable on both theoretical and empirical grounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ann, J. (2001). Bilingualism and language contact. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of sign languages (pp. 33–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arcodia, G. F., Grandi, N., & Wälchli, B. (2010). Coordination in compounding. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 177–198). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W. (2003). Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 53–84). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Sandler, W. (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language, 301–344.
Baker, M. C., & Fasola, C. A. (2009). Araucanian: Mapudungun. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 594–608). New York: Oxford University Press.
Battison, R. (2000). Analyzing signs. In C. Valli & C. Lucas (Eds.), Linguistics of American Sign Language: an introduction (pp. 231–242). Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
Bauer, L. (2001). Compounding. In M. Haspelmath, E. Konig, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Bauer, L. (2009). Typology of compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 343–356). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bauer, L. (2010). The typology of exocentric compounds. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 167–175). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Booij, G. (2005). The grammar of words. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ceccagno, A., & Basciano, B. (2007). Compound headedness in Chinese: an analysis of neologisms. Morphology, 207–231.
Costello, E. (1994). Random House American Sign Language dictionary. New York: Random House.
Don, J. (2009). IE. Germanic: Dutch. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 370–385). New York: Oxford University Press.
Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: insights from sign language research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Emmorey, K. (Ed.) (2003). Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fabb, N. (2001). Compounding. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), The handbook of morphology (pp. 66–83). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 51(3), 696–719.
Grandi, N. (2009). When morphology “feeds” syntax: remarks on noun > adjective conversion in Italian appositive compounds. In F. Montermini, G. Boye, & J. Tseng (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Decembrettes, Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Grinevald, C. (2003). Classifier systemes in the context of a typology of nominal classification. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives in classifier constructions in signed languages (pp. 87–109). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guevara, E., & Scalise, S. (2009). Searching for universals in compounding. In S. M. Scalise & A. Bisetto (Eds.), Universals of language today (pp. 101–128). Amsterdam: Springer.
Harley, H. (2009). Compounding in distributed morphology. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 129–144). New York: Oxford University Press.
Haugen, E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 210–231.
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: doubling in morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Isenhath, J. O. (1990). The linguistics of American Sign Language. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
Kastovsky, D. (2009). Diachronic perspectives. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 323–342). New York: Oxford University Press.
Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kornfeld, L. M. (2009). IE, Romance: Spanish. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 436–452). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lieber, R. (2009). IE, Germanic: English. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 357–369). New York: Oxford University Press.
Liddell, S. K. (1984). Think and Believe: sequentiality in American Sign Language signs. Language, 372–399.
Liddell, S. K., & Johnson, R. E. (1986). American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural language and linguistic theory, 445–513.
Liddell, S. K., & Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 197–277.
Lucas, C., Bayley, R., Valli, C., Rose, M., & Wulf, A. (2001). Sociolinguistic variation. In C. Lucas (Ed.) The sociolinguistics of sign language (pp. 61–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucas, C., & Valli, C. (1992). Language contact in the American Deaf community. New York: Academic Press.
Marantz, A. (1982). ReReduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(3), 435–482.
Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: a synchronic-diachronic approach (2nd ed.). Munich: Beck.
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics: Vol. 18. Papers in Optimality Theory (pp. 249–384). Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Students Association (GLSA).
Meir, I. (2002). A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20(2), 413–450.
Mithun, M. (1984). The evolution of noun incorporation. Language, 847–894.
Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Behan, B., & Lee, R. G. (2000). The syntax of American Sign Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Padden, C. A. (1990). The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues (pp. 118–132). Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
Pettigrew, W. (1918). In Tangkhul Naga grammar and dictionary (Ukhrul dialect). Shillong: Assam Secretariat Printing Office.
Rice, K. (2009). Athapaskan: Slave. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 542–563). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenberg, M. (2007). Classification, headedness and pluralization: corpus evidence from French compounds. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 341–360.
Sandler, W. (1987). Assimilation and feature hierarchy of American sign language. In A. Bosch, B. Need, & E. Schiller (Eds.), Chicago linguistics society parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology (pp. 266–278). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: linearity and nonlinearity. In American sign language, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scalise, S., & Bisetto, A. (2009). The classification of compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 34–53). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sexton, A. L. (1999). Grammaticalization in American sign language. Language Sciences, 105–141.
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. In Studies in linguistics: occasional papers. Buffalo: University of Buffalo.
Supalla, T., & Newport, E. (1978). How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American sign language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 91–132). New York: Academic Press.
Valli, C., & Lucas, C. (2000). Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
Wälchli, B. (2005). Co-compounds and natural coordination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilbur, R. B. (1987). American sign language and sign systems. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Xiong, L., Xiong, W. J., & Xiong, N. (1992). English-Mong-English dictionary. Milwaukee: Xiong Partnership Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vercellotti, M.L., Mortensen, D.R. A classification of compounds in American Sign Language: an evaluation of the Bisetto and Scalise framework. Morphology 22, 545–579 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-012-9205-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-012-9205-1