Skip to main content
Log in

A Realization Optimality-Theoretic approach to affix order

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interplay of the main factors affecting affix order in inflection (semantic scope, phonology, and morphological templates) can be accounted for in an inferential-realizational Optimality-Theoretic model of morphology, which we present here. Within this model, phonological form is spelled out by means of individual-language-particular realization constraints that associate abstract morphosyntactic feature values with phonological forms and that are ordered among more general constraints governing factors like scope and feature splitting. The data used to exemplify the application of our theory to affix order are drawn from Haspelmath’s (A grammar of Lezgian, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993) grammar of Lezgian, a language of the Northeast Caucasian family spoken largely in Dagestan (Russia) and Azerbaijan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aissen J. (1999) Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aissen, J. (2003a). Differential coding, partial blocking, and Bidirectional OT. In P. Nowak & C. Yoquelet (Eds.), Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistic Society (Vol. 29, pp. 1–16).

  • Aissen J. (2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S.R. (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S.R. (2004) Morphological universals and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology 2004: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff M. (1976) Word formation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff M. (1994) Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baerman M. (2004) Directionality and (un)natural classes in syncretism. Language 80: 807–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. (1985) The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Benua L. (1995) Identity effects in morphological truncation. In: Beckman J.N., Dickey L.W., Urbanczyk S. (eds) Papers in Optimality Theory (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18). Amherst, UMass, GLSA, pp 77–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins J.P. (2006) Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42: 531–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, E. (2004). Morph insertion and allomorphy in Optimality Theory. In P. Boersma & J. A. Cutillas (Eds.), Advances in Optimality Theory, special issue of International Journal of English Studies, 4, 74–104.

  • Booij G. (2005) Compounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In: Dressler W.U., Rainer F., Kastovsky D., Pfeiffer O. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij G. (2007) Construction morphology and the lexicon. In: Montermini F., Boyé G., Hatbout N. (eds) Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp 34–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (2008). Construction morphology and compounding. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press. M. Aronoff, Z. Xu

  • Booij, G. (2009). Constructions and lexical units: An analysis of Dutch numerals. Linguistische Berichte 19(Sonderheft), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee J.L. (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole P. (1982) Imbabura Quechua (Lingua Descriptive Series 5). North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1975) Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 1974: 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1976). The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (Syntax and semantics) (Vol. 6, pp. 261–312). New York: Academic Press.

  • Dimmendaal G.J. (1983) The Turkana language. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick D., Marantz A. (2008) Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embick D., Noyer R. (2001) Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, J. (2003). Strong linearity: Three case studies towards a theory of morphosyntactic templatic constructions. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Greenberg J. (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: Greenberg J. (eds) Universals of language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 73–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw J. (1986) A morphosyntactic explanation for the mirror principle. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 745–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw J. (1997) Projection, heads, and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw J. (1997) The best clitic: Constraint conflict in morphosyntax. In: Haegeman L. (eds) Elements of grammar. Kluwer, Dortrecht, pp 169–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw J. (2001) Optimal clitic positions and the lexicon in Romance clitic systems. In: Legendre G., Grimshaw J., Vikner S. (eds) Optimality-Theoretic syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 205–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle M., Marantz A. (1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: Hale K., Keyser S.J. (eds) The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 111–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath M. (1993) A grammar of Lezgian. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman L.M. (2003) Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. Yearbook of Morphology 2002: 245–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien, M. (2000). Syntactic heads and word-formation: A study of verbal inflection. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tromsø.

  • Kager R. (1996) On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In: Kleinheiz U. (eds) Interfaces in phonology. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kager R. (1999) Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz M. (1994) Phonology in generative grammar. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz M. (1997) Base identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In: Durand J., Laks B. (eds) Current trends in phonology: Models and methods. University of Salford, Salford, pp 363–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky P. (1982) Lexical phonology and morphology. In: Yang I.-S. (eds) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul, Hanshin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky P. (2005) Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. Yearbook of Morphology 2004: 113–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakämper R., Wunderlich D. (1998) Person marking in Quechua: A constraint-based minimalist analysis. Lingua 105: 113–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacBride, A. I. (2004). A constraint-based approach to morphology. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Magometov A.A. (1965) Tabasaranskij jazyk. Tbilisi, Mecniereba

    Google Scholar 

  • Magometov A.A. (1970) Agul’skij jazyk. Tbilisi, Mecniereba

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascaró J. (2007) External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 715–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews P.H. (1972) Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews P.H. (1974) Morphology: An introduction to the theory of word-structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews P.H. (1991) Morphology (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. (2011). Pausal phonology and morpheme realization. in T. Borowsky, S. Kawahara, T. Shinya & M. Sugahara (Eds.), Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Lisa Selkirk. http://www.equinoxpub.com/books/showbook.asp?bkid=417.

  • McCarthy J.J., Prince A. (1993) Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993a: 79–153

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1993b). Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-482.

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In M. Gonzàlez (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 24 (pp. 333–379). Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18) (pp. 249–384). Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.

  • Mohanan, K. P., & Mohanan, T. (2003). Universal and language-particular constraints in OT-LFG. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG03 conference. Stanford: CSLI.

  • Moor M. (1985) Studien zum lesgischen Verb. Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyer R. (1998) Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In: Lapointe S.G., Brentari D.K., Farrell P.M. (eds) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 264–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer F.R. (2001) Mood and modality (2nd Ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Paster M. (2005) Pulaar verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix order. Yearbook of Morphology 2005: 155–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paster, M. (2006). Phonological conditions on affixation. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Paster, M. (2009). Phonologically conditioned affix order as an illusory phenomenon. Paper presented at the workshop on division of labor between morphology and phonology. Amsterdam.

  • Rice K. (2000) Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, K. (2008). Forming the Athapaskan verb: What role for phonological factors? Paper presented at the Berkeley workshop on affix ordering.

  • Rosenthall S. (1997) The distribution of prevocalic vowels. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 139–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, K. (1995). Morphemes and candidates in Optimality Theory. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-44.

  • Russell K. (1997) Optimality Theory and morphology. In: Archangeli D., Langendoen D.T. (eds) Optimality Theory: An overview. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 102–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir E. (1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt Brace & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer A. (2003) Putting some order into morphology: Reflections on Rice (2000) and Stump (2001). Journal of Linguistics 39: 621–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiebels, B. (2000). Linker inventories, linking splits and lexical economy. In B. Stiebels & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Lexicon in focus (Studia Grammatica) (Vol. 45, pp. 211–245). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

  • Stiebels B. (2003) Transparent, restricted and opaque affix orders. In: Junghanns U., Szucsich L. (eds) Syntactic structures and morphological information. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 283–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump G.T. (1993) On rules of referral. Language 69: 449–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stump G.T. (2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T. (2009). The typology of ordinal formation and its implications for a theory of derivational morphology. Paper presented at the conference “Universals and typology in word-formation”, P. J. Šafárik University, KoŠice, Slovakia.

  • Trommer, J. (2001). A hybrid account of affix order. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuvel (Eds.), Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 37, pp. 469–480).

  • Trommer J. (2003) The interaction of morphology and syntax in affix order. Yearbook of Morphology 2002: 283–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslar, P. K. (1896). Étnografija Kavkaza. Jazykoznanie. VI. Kjurinskij jazyk [Ethnography of the Caucasus. Linguistics. VI. The Küre language]. Tiflis.

  • Wolf, M. A. (2008). Optimal interleaving: Serial phonology–morphology interaction in a constraintbased model. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Woolford E. (2001) Case patterns. In: Legendre G., Grimshaw J., Vikner S. (eds) Optimality-Theoretic syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 509–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich D. (1997) Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich D. (2001) A correspondence-theoretic analysis of Dalabon transitive paradigms. Yearbook of Morphology 2000: 233–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, D. (2006). Syntax: Optimality Theory. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 12, pp. 408–418). Elsevier: Oxford.

  • Wunderlich D., Fabri R. (1996) Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 1995 14(2): 236–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel W.U. (1989) Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2007a). An Optimality-Theoretic account of full and partial identity of forms. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (PLC-30). Penn Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 421–434).

  • Xu, Z. (2007b). Inflectional morphology in Optimality Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Stony Brook University.

  • Xu, Z., & Aronoff, M. (2008). A realization Optimality-Theoretic approach to blocking and extended morphological exponence. Paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.

  • Yip M. (1998) Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In: Lapointe S.G., Brentari D.K., Farrell P.M. (eds) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax. Stanford, CSLI, pp 216–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. (1985). How to describe inflection. In M. Niepokuj, M. van Clay, V. Nikiforidou, & D. Feder (Eds.), Proceedings of Berkekey Linguistic Society (Vol. 11, pp. 372–386). Berkeley: University of California.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aronoff, M., Xu, Z. A Realization Optimality-Theoretic approach to affix order. Morphology 20, 381–411 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9181-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9181-2

Keywords

Navigation