Case and configurationality: scrambling or mapping? Authors
First Online: 14 July 2010 Received: 08 June 2008 Accepted: 04 February 2010 DOI:
Cite this article as: Donohue, M. Morphology (2011) 21: 499. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9180-3 Abstract
Kanum, a language of southern New Guinea, displays nonconfigurationality only for arguments marked with an overt structural case. After examining a variety of constraints on scrambling, in main and subordinate clauses, I argue that nonconfigurationality is a process of scrambling, rather than independent mapping from functional structure to constituency, and further is dependent on features associated with overt morphological case, and that alternative accounts in terms of grammatical function identity cannot be sustained.
Keywords Papuan Configurationality Case References
Andrews A.D. (1996) Semantic case stacking and inside-out unification. Australian Journal of Linguistics 16: 1–55
Austin P. (2001) Word order in a free word order language: The case of Jiwarli. In: Simpson J., Nash D., Laughren M., Austin P., Alpher B. (eds) Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages. Pacific Linguistics, Canberra, pp 305–323
Austin P., Bresnan J. (1996) Non-configurationality in Australian Aboriginal languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 215–268
Baker M. (1996) The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Baker M. (2001) The natures of nonconfigurationality. In: Baltin M., Collins C. (eds) The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 407–438
Boelaars J.H.M.C. (1950) The linguistic position of South-western New Guinea. E. J. Brill, Leiden
Bresnan J., Kanerva J.M. (1989) Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1): 1–50
Comrie B. (1978) Ergativity. In: Lehmann W.P. (eds) Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 329–394
Donohue, M. (1997).
Cognate objects, nonconfigurationality, (and other issues in ‘transitivity’ in Kanum). Paper presented at the Syntax project meeting, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, 27 November 1997.
Donohue, M. (1999).
Conflicts in feature parsing: External possession and Kanum agreement. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistics Society. University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 1 October 1999.
Donohue M. (2005) Configurationality in the languages of New Guinea. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25(2): 181–218
Donohue M. (2008) Complexities with restricted numeral systems. Linguistic Typology 12(3): 423–429
Drabbe, P. (1947).
Nota’s over de Jénggalntjoer-taal. Merauke: Archief.
Drabbe P. (1950) Talen en dialecten van Zuid-West Nieuw-Guinea. Anthropos 45: 545–574
Hale K.L. (1983) Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47
Jelinek E. (1984) Empty categories, case, and non-configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39–76
Kiparsky P. (2001) Structural case in Finnish. Lingua 111(4): 315–376
Legate, J. A. (2002).
Warlpiri: Theoretical implications. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Nordlinger R. (1998) Constructive case: Evidence from Australian languages. Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford
Pensalfini R. (2004) Towards a typology of configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 359–408
Simpson J. (1991) Warlpiri morphosyntax: A lexicalist approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Wunderlich D. (1997) Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010