Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baerman, M. (2002a). Armenian. In Surrey syncretisms database. http://www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/.

  • Baerman, M. (2002b). Surrey person syncretism database. http://www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/.

  • Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2002). The Surrey syncretism database. http://www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/.

  • Baerman M., Brown D., Corbett G.G. (2005) The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhaus-Gerst M. (1996) Sprachwandel durch Sprachkontakt am Beispiel des Nubischen im Niltal: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer diachronen Soziolinguistik. Cologne, Rüdiger Köppe

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel B., Nichols J. (2005) Inclusive-exclusive as person vs. number categories worldwide. In: Filimonova E. (eds) Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–exclusive distinction Typological Studies in Language 63. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 49–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake B.J. (1994) Case. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, H. (2005). Constructing dual number in Hopi. In M.-O. Junker, M. McGinnis & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Canadian linguistics association annual conference. http://www.carleton.ca/~mojunker/ACL-CLA/pdf/Bliss-CLA-2004.pdf.

  • Bloomfield L. (1933) Language. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik J.D. (2008) Missing persons: A case study in morphological universals. The Linguistic Review 25: 203–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B. (2009). Changes and persistencies in the use of Russian masculine genitives in –u: New evidence from corpus linguistics. In S. Birzer, M. Finkelstein, & I. Mendoza (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international perspectives on slavistics conference: Regensburg 2006 (=Die Welt der Slaven special volume 36 (pp. 53–67). Munich: Otto Sagner.

  • Brown, D. (1998a). From the general to the exceptional: A network morphology account of Russian nominal inflection. PhD thesis, University of Surrey.

  • Brown D. (1998) Defining ‘subgender’: Virile and devirilized nouns in Polish. Lingua 104: 187–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D. (2007) Peripheral functions and overdifferentiation: The Russian second locative. Russian Linguistics 31: 61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D., Tiberius C., Corbett G.G. (2007) The alignment of form and function: Corpus-based evidence. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12: 511–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., & Dryer, M. S. (Ms.). Diminutive as an inflectional category in Walman. Ms. University at Buffalo. linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/BrownDryerWalmanDimin.pdf. Accessed 1 January 19, 2009.

  • Browne G.M. (2002) Old Nubian grammar (Languages of the World/Materials 330). Lincom Europa, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee J.L. (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstairs-McCarthy A. (1994) Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70: 737–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chumakina, M., Kibort, A., & Corbett, G. G. (2007). Determining a language’s feature inventory: Person in Archi. In P. K. Austin & A. Simpson (Eds.), Endangered languages (special issue of Linguistische Berichte, number 14) (pp. 143–172). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.

  • Comrie B. (1986) On delimiting cases. In: Brecht R.D., Levine J. (eds) Case in Slavic. Slavica, Columbus, OH, pp 86–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1991) Form and function in identifying cases. In: Plank F. (eds) Paradigms: The economy of inflection (Empirical approaches to language typology 9). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 41–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (2003). When agreement gets trigger-happy. In D. Brown, G. Corbett & C. Tiberius (Eds.), Agreement: A typological perspective. (Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101 no. 2) (pp. 313–373). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Comrie B., Stone G., Polinsky M. (1996) The Russian language in the twentieth century. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G.G. (1991) Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G.G. (2000) Number. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G.G. (2003) Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In: Booij G., DeCesaris J., Ralli A., Scalise S. (eds) Topics in Morphology: Selected papers from the third Mediterranean morphology meeting (Barcelona, September 20–22, 2001). Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, pp 109–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G.G. (2006) Agreement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G.G. (2007) Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83: 8–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. G. (2007b). Deponency, syncretism and what lies between. In M. Baerman, G. G. Corbett, D. Brown, & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches (Proceedings of the British Academy, 145) (pp. 21–43). Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.

  • Corbett G.G. (2007) Gender and noun classes. In: Shopen T. (eds) Language typology and syntactic description: III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 241–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G.G. (2008) Determining morphosyntactic feature values: The case of case. In: Corbett G.G., Noonan M. (eds) Case and grammatical relations: Papers in honor of Bernard Comrie. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. G. (Forthcoming a). Higher order exceptionality in inflectional morphology. To appear In H. J. Simon & H. Wiese (Eds.), Expecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [With comments by Stephen Anderson.].

  • Corbett, G. G. (Forthcoming b). Features: Some key concepts. To appear In A. Kibort & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Corbett, G. G. (Forthcoming c). Canonical morphosyntactic features. To appear In D. Brown, G. G. Corbett & M. Chumakina (Eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Corbett G.G., Baerman M. (2006) Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features. Morphology 16: 231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. G., & Fraser, N. M. (1993). Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian inflectional morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 113–142. (Reprinted in Morphology: Critical concepts in Linguistics, VI: Morphology: Its Place in the Wider Context, pp. 364–396, by F. X. Katamba, Ed., 2003, London: Routledge.)

  • Cysouw, M. (2003). The paradigmatic structure of person marking. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press

  • Cysouw, M. (2005). Syncretisms involving clusivity. In E. Filimonova (Ed.), Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–exclusive distinction (Typological Studies in Language 63) (pp. 73– 111). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Daniel, M. (2005). Understanding inclusives. In E. Filimonova (Ed.), Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–exclusive distinction (Typological Studies in Language 63) (pp. 3–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Dol, P. (2007). A grammar of Maybrat: A language of the Bird’s Head Penisula, Papua Province, Indonesia (Pacific Linguistics, 586). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.

  • Evans, N. (2003). Typologies of agreement: some problems from Kayardild. In D. Brown, G. G. Corbett, & C. Tiberius (Eds.), Agreement: A typological perspective (Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101, no. 2) (pp. 203–34). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Evans N., Brown D., Corbett G.G. (2002) The semantics of gender in Mayali: Partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language 78: 111–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser F. (1911) Das Patois von Val d’Illiez (Unterwallis). Halle (Saale), Ehrhardt Karras

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenech E. (1996) Functions of the dual suffix in Maltese. Rivista di Linguistica 8: 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley W.A. (1986) The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley W.A. (1991) The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman V.A. (1993) Macedonian. In: Comrie B., Corbett G.G. (eds) The Slavonic Languages. Routledge, London, pp 249–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L., Bartholomew D. (1979) Pame noun inflection. International Journal of American Linguistics 45: 309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladkij A.V. (2007) O točnyx i matematičeskix metodax v lingvistike i drugix gumanitarnyx naukax. Voprosy jazykoznanija 5: 22–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard C. (1982) Case systems and case marking in Australian languages: A new interpretation. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 167–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graudina L.K., Ickovič V.A., Katlinskaja L.P. (1976) Grammatičeskaja pravil′nost′russkoj reči: opyt častotno-stilističeskogo slovarja variantov. Nauka, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J.H. (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: Greenberg J.H. (eds) Universals of Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 73–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiman J. (1974) Targets and syntactic change. Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbour, D. (2007). Morphosemantic number: From Kiowa noun classes to UG number features (Studies in natural language and linguistic theory 69). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Haviland J. (1979) Guugu Yimidhirr. In: Dixon R.M.W., Blake B.J. (eds) Handbook of Australian languages. Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp 27–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, B. (1968). Die Verbreitung und Gliederung der Togorestsprachen (Kölner Beiträge zur Afrikanistik 1). Berlin: Reimer.

  • Hutchisson D. (1986) Sursurunga pronouns and the special uses of quadral number. In: Wiesemann U. (eds) Pronominal systems (Continuum 5). Tübingen, Narr, pp 217–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Igartua I. (2006) Genus alternans in Indo-European. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 56–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Iggesen O.A. (2005) Case-Asymmetry: A world-wide typological study on lexeme-class-dependent deviations in morphological case inventories. Lincom Europa, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilola, E., & Mustajoki, A. (1989). Report on Russian morphology as it appears in Zaliznyak’s Grammatical Dictionary (=Slavica Helsingiensia 7). Helsinki: Department of Slavonic Languages, University of Helsinki.

  • Jakobson, R. O. (1958/1971). Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem (sostav russkix padežnyx form). In American contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavists, Moscow, September 1958. The Hague: Mouton, 127–156. (Reprinted from Selected Writings II, pp. 154–183, by R. Jakobson Ed., 1971, The Hague: Mouton. Translated as Morphological observations on Slavic declension (the structure of Russian case forms). In L. R. Waugh & M. Halle (Eds.), Roman Jakobson. Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 105–133).

  • Mel′čuk, I. (1986). Toward a definition of case. In R. D. Brecht & J. Levine (Eds.), Case in Slavic (pp. 35–85). Columbus, OH: Slavica. (Revised version in I. Mel′čuk, Aspects of the theory of Morphology, pp. 110–179, by D. Beck, Ed., 2006, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.)

  • Meyer, P. (1994). Grammatical categories and the methodology of linguistics: Review article on van Helden, W. Andries: 1993, Case and gender: Concept formation between morphology and syntax. Russian Linguistics, 18, 341–377.

  • Nikolaeva, I., Spencer, A. (2008). Nouns as adjectives and adjectives as Nouns. Ms.

  • Panov, M. V. (Ed.). (1968). Morfologija i sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (Russkij jazyk i sovetskoe obščestvo: Sociologo-lingvističeskoe issledovanie: III). Moscow: Nauka.

  • Pasch H. (1985) Possession and possessive classifiers in ’Dongo-ko. Afrika und übersee 68: 69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasch, H. (1986). Die Mba-Sprachen: Die Nominalklassensysteme und die genetische Gliederung einer Gruppe von Ubangi-Sprachen (Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 6). Hamburg: Buske.

  • Patri, S. (2007). L’alignement syntaxique dans les langues indo-européennes d’Anatolie (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten: herausgegeben von der Kommission für den Alten Orient der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, 49). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

  • Paus C. (1994) Social and pragmatic conditioning in the decline of the Russian partitive case. Russian Linguistics 18: 249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plungian [Plungjan] V.A. (2002) K semantike russkogo lokativa. Semiotika i informatika 37: 229–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky, M. (2003). Non-canonical agreement is canonical. In D. Brown, G. Corbett, & C. Tiberius (Eds.), Agreement: A typological perspective (Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101 no. 2), (pp. 279–312). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Pullum, G. K., Tiede, H.-J. (forthcoming). Inessential features and expressive power of descriptive metalanguages. To appear in A. Kibort & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rapold C.J. (2007) From demonstratives to verb agreement in Benchnon: A diachronic perspective. In: Amha A., Mous M., Savà G. (eds) Omotic and Cushitic language studies: Papers from the fourth Cushitic Omotic conference, Leiden, 10–12 April 2003. Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, Cologne, pp 69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. D. (1988). Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of Western Melanesia (Pacific Linguistics, series C, no. 98). Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.

  • Seifart, F. (2005). The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.

  • Sparing-Chávez M.W. (1998) Amahuaca (Panoan). In: Derbyshire D.C., Pullum G.K. (eds) Handbook of Amazonian languages: IV. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 441–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (2005). Extending deponency. In M. Baerman, G. G. Corbett, D. Brown, & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Deponency and Morphological Mismatches (Proceedings of the British Academy, 145), (pp. 45–70). Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.

  • Steinhauer H. (1985) Number in Biak: Counterevidence to two alleged language universals. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 141: 462–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T. (2005). A non-canonical pattern of deponency and its implications. In M. Baerman, G. G. Corbett, D. Brown, & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches (Proceedings of the British Academy, 145), (pp. 71–95). Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.

  • Stump G.T. (2006) Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language 82: 279–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T., & Finkel, R. (2008). Stem alternations and principal parts in French verb inflection. Paper presented at Décembrettes 6: Colloque International de Morphologie, Morphologie et classes flexionnelles, December 4–5, 2008, Université de Bordeaux, France.

  • Suthar, B. K. (2006). Agreement in Gujarati. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Thornton, A. (2008). A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology: double forms realizing the same cell. Paper read at the First Oxford Workshop On Romance verb morphology, 27–28 August, Oxford.

  • Tucker, A. N., & Bryan, M. A. (1966). Linguistic analyses: The Non-Bantu languages of North-Eastern Africa (With a supplement on the Ethiopic Languages by Wolf Leslau). London: Oxford University Press.

  • Uspenskij, B. A. (2004). Čast′i celoe v russkoj grammatike. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul′tury.

  • van Helden, W. A. (1993). Case and gender: Concept formation between morphology and syntax (II volumes) (Studies in Slavic and general linguistics 20). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • van den Heuvel, W. (2006). Biak: Description of an Austronesian language of Papua. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, http://www.lotpublications.nl/index3.html.

  • Wierzbicka A. (1983) The semantics of case marking. Studies in Language 7: 247–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worth D.S. (1984) Russian gen2, loc2 revisited. In: Baak J.J. (eds) Signs of friendship: To honour A. G. F van Holk, Slavist, Linguist, Semiotician. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Xalilov, M. Š. (1985). Ob ograničennom množestvennom čisle suščestvitel′nyx bežtinskogo jazyka. In K. Š. Mikailov (Ed.), Kategorija čisla v dagestanskix jazykax: sbornik statej, (pp. 136–143). Makhachkala: Dagestanskij filial AN SSSR.

  • Xalilov, M. Š. (1995). Bežtinsko-russkij slovar′. Makhachkala: Dagestanskij naučnyj centr Rossijskoj akademii nauk.

  • Zaliznjak, A. A. (1967). Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie Moscow: Nauka. (Reprinted in Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie: s priloženiem izbrannyx rabot po sovremennomu russkomu jazyku i obščemu jazykoznaniju, (pp. 1–370), by. A. A. Zaliznjak , Ed., 2002, Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul′tury.)

  • Zaliznjak, A. A. (1973). O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax. In Andrej A. Zaliznjak (Ed.), Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija (pp. 53–87). Moscow: Nauka, [Reprinted in: Andrej A. Zaliznjak. 2002. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie: s priloženiem izbrannyx rabot po sovremennomu russkomu jazyku i obščemu jazykoznaniju. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul′tury. 613–47.].

  • Zaliznjak, A. A. (1977). Grammatičeskij slovar′russkogo jazyka: slovoizmenenie. Moscow: Russkij jazyk. [A fourth, corrected edition appeared in 2003, Moscow: Russkie slovari.].

  • Zwicky A. (1996) Syntax and phonology. In: Brown K., Miller J. (eds) Concise Encyclopedia of syntactic theories. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 300–305

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surrey Morphology Group, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK

    Greville G. Corbett

Authors
  1. Greville G. Corbett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greville G. Corbett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corbett, G.G. The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems. Morphology 21, 445–480 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9171-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9171-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation