Abstract
In this article syncretic patterning in the present indicative paradigm of the verb kloppen (‘to knock’) is described for 355 Dutch dialects taken from the morphological atlas of Dutch dialects (Van den Berg 2003). Following Baerman et al. (2005, The syntax-morphology interface. A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), I distinguish syncretisms driven by (universal) feature structure and language specific sources of syncretism. I present independent evidence for the role of phonology, pragmatics and amplification in the formation of syncretic patterns of Dutch. The benefit of the study of the interaction between language specific routes to syncretism and feature structure is threefold. We know language specific routes to syncretism can obscure feature structure. By distinguishing the different routes to syncretism we canalsorevealthe strength of feature structure. Secondly, distinguishing sources of syncretisms enables us to understand similarities and differences in the cross-linguistic patterning of syncretisms. Thirdly, we can link typological data to language acquisition patterns.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aalberse S. (2004). Waer bestu bleven? De verdwijning van het pronomen ‘du’ in een taalvergelijkend perspectief. Nederlandse Taalkunde 9(3): 231–254
Ackema P., Neeleman Ad. (2004). Beyond morphology. Interface conditions on word formation. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Aikhenvald A.Y., Dixon R.M. (1998). Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74(1): 56–80
Anderson S.R. (2004). Morphological universals and diachrony. In: Booij G.E., van Marle J. (eds). Yearbook of morphology. Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 1-14
Baerman M. (2004). Typology and the formal modelling of syncretism. In Booij G.E., van Marle J. (eds). Yearbook of morphology. Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 41-72
Baerman M. (2005). Directionality and (Un)natural classes in syncretism. Language 80(4): 807–824
Baerman M., Brown D. (2005a). Syncretism in verbal person/ number marking. In: Haspelmath M., Bibiko H.J. (eds). The World Atlas of language structures. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 122-123
Baerman M., Brown D. (2005b). Case syncretism. In Haspelmath M., Bibiko H.J. (eds). The World Atlas of language structures. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 118-119
Baerman M., Brown D., Corbett G.G. (2005). The syntax-morphology interface. A study of syncretism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Barbiers, S., et al. (2006). 2006 Dynamische Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (DynaSAND) <http://www.meertens.nl/sand/> Accessed arch 1st 2007.
Bennis, H., & MacLean, A. (2007). Variation in verbal inflection in Dutch dialects. Morphology, 16(2).
Brown P., Levinson S.C. (1987). Politeness Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Buitenrust-Hettema F. (1891). De aangesproken persoon. Taal en Letteren 1: 148–153
Bybee J.L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam, John Benjamins
Comrie B. (1975). Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language 51(2): 406–418
Coveney A. (2000). Vestiges of Nous and the 1st person plural verb in informal spoken French. Language Sciences 22(4): 447–481
Cysouw M. (2003). The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Cysouw M. (2005). What it means to be rare: The variability of person marking. In: Frajzyngier Z., Hodges A., Rood D.S. (eds). Linguistic diversity and language theories. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Benjamins, pp. 235- 258
De Vogelaer, G. (2005). Subjectsmarkering in de Nederlandse en Friese dialecten. <http://user-s.ugent.be/~gdvogela/proefschrift>. Accessed on January 22nd 2007.
Evans, N., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. (2000). Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: A network morphology analysis. Yearbook of Morphology.
Franck J. (1910). Mittelniederländische Grammatik mit Lesestücken und Glossar. Leipzig, Tauchnitz
Goeman A.C.M., Taeldeman J. (1996). Fonologie en morfologie van de Nederlandse dialecten. Een nieuwe materiaalverzameling en twee nieuwe atlasprojecten. Taal en Tongval 48, 38–59
Goeman A.C.M. (1999). T-deletie in Nederlandse dialecten. Kwantitatieve analyse van structurele, ruimtelijke en temporele variatie. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics
Harley H. (1994). Hug a tree: Deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 289–320
Harley H., Ritter E. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526
Head B. (1978). Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In: Greenberg J.H. (ed). Universals of human language. Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. 151-211
Heath J. (1991). Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix paradigms. In Planck F. (ed). Paradigms: The economy of inflection. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 75-90
Heath J. (1998). Pragmatic skewing in 1–2 pronominal combinations in native american languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64(2): 83–104
Hickey R. (2003). Rectifying a standard deficiency. Second-person pronominal distrinctions in varieties of English. In Taavitsainen I., Jucker A.H. (eds). Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 343-373
Lass R. (1999). Phonology and morphology. In Lass R. (Ed). The Cambridge history of the English language. 1476–1776 (vol. III pp. 56–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maiden M. (1992). Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 285–312
Pinker S. (1996). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Van Aken H. (1996). Van uitgang tot vooruitgang: het verdwijnen van de werkwoordsuitgangen van de tweede persoon uit het Nederlands. Utrecht, manuscript
Van den Berg, B. L. (2003). Phonology & morphology of Dutch & Frisian Dialects in 1.1 million transcriptions. Goeman-Taeldeman-Van Reenen project 1980–1995, Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut. (CD-ROM). Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.
Van Gestel F., Nijen T.J., Rinkel T., Weerman F. (1992). Oude zinnen. Grammaticale analyse van het Nederlands tussen 1200–1700. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff
Vermaas H. (2002). Veranderingen in de Nederlandse aanspreekvormen van de dertiende t/m de twintigste eeuw. Utrecht, LOT
Vor der Hake J.A. (1908). De aanspreekvormen in ’t Nederlandsch. Utrecht, P. Den Boer
Wales, K. (2004). Second person pronouns in contemporary English: The end of a story or just the beginning? Franco British Studies, 33–34, 172–185.
Watkins L.J. (1984). A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press
Weerman F., De Wit P. (1999). The decline of the genitive in Dutch. Linguistics 37(6): 1155–1192
Weijnen A. (1941). De Nederlandse dialecten. Groningen, Noordhoff
Zilles A.M.S. (2005). The development of a new pronoun: The linguistic and social embedding of a gente in Brazilian Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 17(1): 19–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Aalberse, S.P. The typology of syncretisms and the status of feature structure. Verbal paradigms across 355 Dutch dialects. Morphology 17, 109–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-007-9111-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-007-9111-0