Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Norms and Age-Disparate Sexual Relationships as Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Violence, and Risky Sex among Adolescent Gang Members

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unequal gender norms and age-disparate sexual relationships can lead to power imbalances and are also associated with intimate partner violence (IPV), sexual coercion and violence, and sexual risk behaviors. The present study examined these variables from both victim and perpetrator perspectives among adolescent gang members. Age-disparate sexual relationships were defined as sex partners 5 or more years older among female participants and 5 or more years younger among male participants. Participants were recruited from a mid-sized Midwestern city and completed a 60–90-min audio computer-assisted self-interview in a community-based setting. Participants in this study included 107 female gang members (68 % African-American, 19 % Latina; mean age, 17.6) and 169 male gang members (62 % African-American, 28 % Latino; mean age, 17.7). As hypothesized, endorsing unequal gender norms toward women was significantly related to IPV victimization among female participants and perpetration among male participants, and engagement in group sex in the past month among both female and male participants (ps < 0.05). Additionally, unequal gender norms were significantly related to male participants’ perpetrating rape (p < 0.05). As hypothesized, female gang members who had been in age-disparate sexual relationships were significantly more likely to have experienced more IPV and report being raped and males gang members who had age-disparate sexual relationships were significantly more likely to perpetrate IPV in the past year and perpetrate rape (ps < 0.05). Age-disparate sexual relationships were also significantly related to being gang raped among female gang members and participating in a gang rape among male gang members, and engaging in group sex among both female and male gang members (ps < 0.05). Female participants who had been in age-disparate sexual relationships were more likely to have been pregnant (ps < 0.05). It is essential for researchers and public health practitioners to create programs for female adolescents to reduce or avoid risky situations, such as inability to negotiate condom use with older sex partners. Additionally, programs must be developed for both female and male gang members to help them understand and identify unequal gender norms, and interpersonal and sexual coercion/violence. Early intervention will also be necessary as these adolescent gang members are already engaged in extremely high-risk, coercive, and violent behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pulerwitz J, Barker G. Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM scale. Men Masc. 2008; 10(3): 322–338. doi:10.1177/1097184X06298778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lefkowitz ES, Shearer CL, Gillen MM, Espinosa-Hernandez G. How gendered attitudes relate to women’s and men’s sexual behaviors and beliefs. Sex Cult. 2014; 18(4): 833–846. doi:10.1007/s12119-014-9225-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lundgren R, Amin A. Addressing intimate partner violence and sexual violence among adolescents: emerging evidence of effectiveness. J Adolesc Heal. 2015; 56(1): S42–S50. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wingood GM, Diclemente RJ, Mccree DH, Harrington K, Davies SL. Dating violence and the sexual health of black adolescent females. Pediatrics. 2001; 107(5): e72. doi:10.1542/peds.107.5.e72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Minnis AM, Moore JG, Doherty IA, et al. Gang exposure and pregnancy incidence among female adolescents in San Francisco: evidence for the need to integrate reproductive health with violence prevention efforts. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(9): 1102–1109. doi:10.1093/aje/kwn011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Marín BV, Gómez CA, Tschann JM, Gregorich SE. Condom use in unmarried Latino men: a test of cultural constructs. Heal Psychol. 1997; 16(5): 458–467. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.5.458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caron SL, Carter DB. The relationships among sex role orientation, egalitarianism, attitudes toward sexuality, and attitudes toward violence against women. J Soc Psychol. 1997; 137(5): 568–587. doi:10.1080/00224549709595479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murnen SK, Wright C, Kaluzny G. If “boys will be boys”, then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of research that relate masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles. 2002; 46(11/12): 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shannon K, Leiter K, Phaladze N, et al. Gender inequity norms are associated with increased male-perpetrated rape and sexual risks for HIV infection in Botswana and Swaziland. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1): e28739. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Updegraff KA, Mchale SM, Zeiders KH, et al. Mexican American adolescents’ gender role attitude development: the role of adolescents’ \s. J Youth Adolesc. 2014; 43(12): 2041–2053. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0128-5.Mexican.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Crouter AC, Whiteman SD, Mchale SM, Osgood DW. Across middle childhood and development of gender attitude traditionality adolescence. Child Dev. 2007; 78(3): 911–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller E, Decker MR, Raj A, Reed E, Marable D, Silverman JG. Intimate partner violence and health care-seeking patterns among female users of urban adolescent clinics. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14(6): 910–917. doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0520-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seth P, Diclemente RJ, Lovvorn AE. State of the evidence: intimate partner violence and HIV/STI risk among adolescents. Curr HIV Res. 2013; 11(7): 528–535. doi:10.2174/1570162X12666140129103122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brahmbhatt H, Kågesten A, Emerson M, et al. Prevalence and determinants of adolescent pregnancy in urban, disadvantaged settings across five cities. J Adolesc Heal. 2014; 55(6 Suppl): S48–S57. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.023.Prevalence.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller MK, Wickliffe J, Jahnke S, Linebarger JS, Dowd D. Accessing general and sexual healthcare: experiences of urban youth. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud. 2014; 9(3): 279–290. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.10.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ulloa EC, Dyson RB, Wynes DD. Inter-partner violence in the context of gangs: a review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012; 17(5): 397–404. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller J, Brunson RK. Gender dynamics in youth gangs: a comparison of males’ and females’ accounts. Justice Q. 2000; 17(3): 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cepeda A, Valdez A. Risk behaviors among young Mexican American gang-associated females: sexual relations, partying, substance use, and crime. J Adolesc Res. 2003; 18(1): 90–106. doi:10.1177/0743558402238278.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Molidor CE. Female gang members: a profile of aggression and victimization. Soc Work. 1996; 41(3): 251–257.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dupont-Reyes MJ, Fry D, Rickert VI, Bell DL, Palmetto N, Davidson LL. Relationship violence, fear, and exposure to youth violence among adolescents in New York City. J Interpers Violence. 2014; 29(12): 1–26. doi:10.1177/0886260513518433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller J. Gender and victimization risk among young women in gangs. J Res Crime Delinq. 1998; 35(4): 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gover AR, Jennings WG, Tewksbury R. Adolescent male and female gang members’ experiences with violent victimization, dating violence, and sexual assault. Am J Crim Justice. 2009; 34: 103–115. doi:10.1007/s12103-008-9053-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beckett H, Brodie I, Factor F, et al. “It’s wrong… but you get used to it”: a qualitative study of gang-associated sexual violence towards, and exploitation of, young people in England; 2013. https://www.beds.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/293234/Gangs-Report-final.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2015.

  24. Borowsky IW, Hogan M, Ireland M. Adolescent sexual aggression: risk and protective factors. Pediatrics. 1997; 100(6): E7. doi:10.1542/peds.100.6.e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coy M, Kelly L, Elvines F, Garner M, Kanyeredzi A. “Sex without consent, I suppose that is rape”: how young people in England understand sexual consent. London; 2013. http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Sex_without_consent_I_suppose_that_is_rape_newprint.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2015.

  26. Dickson-Gomez J, Bodnar G, Guevara A, Rodriguez K, Gaborit M. El remolque y el vacil: HIV risk among street gangs in El Salvador. J Gang Res. 2006; 13(2): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Miller E, Levenson R, Herrera L, Kurek L, Stofflet M, Marin L. Exposure to partner, family, and community violence: gang-affiliated Latina women and risk of unintended pregnancy. J Urban Heal. 2011; 89(1): 74–86. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9631-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Quinn K, Mueller M, Dickson-Gomez J. Raw down: HIV risk among adolescent gang members. Roundtable discussion at: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; November 2013. Boston, MA.

  29. Rothman EF, Decker MR, Miller E, Reed E, Raj A, Silverman JG. Multi-person sex among a sample of adolescent female urban health clinic patients. J Urban Heal. 2012; 89(1): 129–137. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9630-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanders B, Lankenau SE, Jackson-Bloom J. Risky sexual behaviors among a sample of gang-identified youth in Los Angeles. Int J Equity Health. 2009; 2(1): 61–71. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.021.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Diclemente RJ, Wingood GM, Crosby RA, et al. Sexual risk behaviors associated with having older sex partners: a study of black adolescent females. Sex Transm Dis. 2002; 29(1): 20–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oudekerk BA, Guarnera LA, Reppucci ND. Older opposite-sex romantic partners, sexual risk, and victimization in adolescence. Child Abuse Negl. 2014; 38(7): 1238–1248. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wyatt GE, Newcomb MD. Internal and external mediators of women’s sexual abuse in childhood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990; 58(6): 758–767. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.58.6.758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wyatt GE, Peters SD. Issues in the definition of child sexual abuse in prevalence research. Child Abuse Negl. 1986; 10: 231–240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ford K, Norris A. Sexual networks of African-American and Hispanic youth. Sex Transm Dis. 1997; 24(6): 327–333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Manlove J, Terry-Humen E, Ikramullah E. Young teenagers and older sexual partners: correlates and consequences for males and females. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38(4): 197–207. doi:10.1363/3819706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hunt G, Joe-Laidler K. Situations of violence in the lives of girl gang members. Health Care Women Int. 2001; 22(4): 363–384. doi:10.1080/07399330152398909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Voisin DR, Neilands TB. Low school engagement and sexual behaviors among African American youth: examining the influences of gender, peer norms, and gang involvement. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010; 32(1): 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Voisin DR, Salazar LF, Crosby R, Diclemente RJ, Yarber WL, Staples-Horne M. The association between gang involvement and sexual behaviours among detained adolescent males. Sex Transm Infect. 2004; 80(6): 440–442. doi:10.1136/sti.2004.010926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Reed E, Silverman JG, Raj A, Decker MR, Miller E. Male perpetration of teen dating violence: associations with neighborhood violence involvement, gender attitudes, and perceived peer and neighborhood norms. J Urban Heal. 2011; 88(2): 226–239. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9545-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wingood GM, Diclemente RJ. Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African American women. Am J Community Psychol. 1998; 26(1): 29–51. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitaker DJ, Haileyesus T, Swahn M, Saltzman LS. Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(5): 941–947. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Santana MC, Raj A, Decker MR, La Marche A, Silverman JG. Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. J Urban Heal. 2006; 83(4): 575–585. doi:10.1007/s11524-006-9061-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tilley DS, Brackley M. Men who batter intimate partners: a grounded theory study of the development of male violence in intimate partner relationships. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2005; 26(3): 281–297. doi:10.1080/01612840590915676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sinozich S, Langton L. Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995–2013. Washington, DC; 2014. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2015.

  46. Akre C, Chabloz J-M, Belanger RE, Michaud P-A, Suris J-C. Unwanted sexual experiences among adolescents: shedding light on the gray zone between consensual and non-consensual sex. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013; 25(1): 69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by one grant (R01-DA027299) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and a center (P30-MH52776) and NRSA (T32-0MH19985) grant from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liesl A. Nydegger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nydegger, L.A., DiFranceisco, W., Quinn, K. et al. Gender Norms and Age-Disparate Sexual Relationships as Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Violence, and Risky Sex among Adolescent Gang Members. J Urban Health 94, 266–275 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0068-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0068-3

Keywords

Navigation