Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intimate Partner Violence Risk among Undergraduate Women from an Urban Commuter College: the Role of Navigating Off- and On-Campus Social Environments

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current attention that is being paid to college sexual assault in policy circles and popular media overlooks a critical issue: the possible role played by the urban social environment in intimate partner violence (IPV) risk for the large number of urban commuter college students throughout the USA and beyond. This article helps to illuminate this dynamic using qualitative research collected at an urban commuter campus in New York City. Specifically, we conducted focus groups and in-depth interviews with 18 female undergraduate students, exploring the nature and consequences of IPV in students’ lives, perceived prevalence of IPV, and resources for addressing IPV. Our results indicate that college attendance may both elevate and protect against IPV risk for students moving between urban off- and on-campus social environments. Based on this, we present a preliminary model of IPV risk for undergraduate women attending urban commuter colleges. In particular, we find that enrolling in college can sometimes elevate risk of IPV when a partner seeks to limit and control their student partner’s experience of college and/or is threatened by what may be achieved by the partner through attending college. These findings suggest a role for urban commuter colleges in helping to mitigate IPV risk through policy formulation and comprehensive ongoing screening and prevention activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For instance, the City University of New York, the large institution studied in this paper, recently asked questions about physical and sexual assault in the last 12 months when conducting a survey of its students’ health experiences, but did not collect information about whether the perpetrator of the assault was an intimate partner. This is being remedied in an upcoming survey. The American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment (http://www.acha-ncha.org/sample_survey.html), which is used voluntarily by some institutions, does include questions about emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by an intimate partner.

  2. Currently, approximately 3,100 CUNY students live on campus out of a total student population of almost 270,000, which is just over 1 % of students.

  3. As noted previously, the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment includes questions assessing the previous year incidence of three forms of IPV. However, the NCHA is a proprietary tool used voluntarily by select colleges, and resultant data is thus not representative of all college students (http://www.acha-ncha.org/partic_history.html). The National College Health Risk Behavior Survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), appears to have gathered data from a representative sample of college students but, to our knowledge, has not been repeated since 1995 (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00049859.htm). In 2011, the CDC published data for the first time from its National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/summary_reports.html), though to our knowledge, the survey has yet to collect enough data to meaningfully examine college students as a subpopulation.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Intimate Partner Violence: Definitions. 2014. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/definitions.html. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  2. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_executive_summary-a.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  3. Flake DF. Individual, family, and community risk markers for domestic violence in Peru. Violence Women. 2005; 11(3): 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Straus M. Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Women. 2004; 10(7): 790–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caldwell JEWV, Swan SC. Gender differences in intimate partner violence outcomes. Psychol Violence. 2012; 2(1): 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Domestic Violence Resource Center. Domestic violence statistics. Available at: http://www.dvrc-or.org/dv-facts-stats/. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  7. United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the United States, 2012.; 2013. Available at: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_10_murder_circumstances_by_relationship_2012.xls. Accessed September 22, 2014.

  8. Knowledge Networks. 2011 College Dating and Abuse Poll.; 2011. Available at: http://www.loveisrespect.org/pdf/College_Dating_And_Abuse_Final_Study.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  9. Straight ES, Harper FW, Arias I. The impact of partner psychological abuse on health behaviors and health status in college women. J Interpers Violence. 2003; 18(9): 1035–1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuh GD, Gonyea RM, Palmer, Megan. The Disengaged Commuter Student: Fact or Fiction? Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning; 2001. Available at: http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/commuter.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2014.

  11. Kuh GD, Kinzie J, Buckley JA, Bridges BK, Hayek JC. What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature. Washington, D.C.: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative; 2006.

  12. CUNY Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Student Data Book. New York City: City University of New York; 2014. Available at: http://www.cuny.edu/irdatabook/rpts2_AY_current/ENRL_0001_UGGR_FTPT.rpt.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2014.

  13. CUNY Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Student Data Book. New York City: City University of New York; 2014. Available at: http://cuny.edu/about/administration/offices/ira/ir/data-book/current/student/ug_student_profile_f13.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2014.

  14. New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene. Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in New York City.; 2008. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/public/ipv-08.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  15. Raj A, Silverman J. Violence against immigrant women: the roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Women. 2002; 8(3): 367–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frye V, Galea S, Tracy M, Bucciarelli A, Putnam S, Wilt S. The role of neighborhood environment and risk of intimate partner femicide in a large urban area. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(8): 1473–1479. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.112813.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarthy SK. Availability of emergency contraceptive pills at university and college student health centers. J Am Coll Health. 2002; 51(1): 15–22. doi:10.1080/07448480209596323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McBride DR, Van Orman S, Wera C, Leino V. 2010 Survey on the Utilization of Student Health Services. American College Health Association Benchmarking Committee; 2010. Available at: http://www.acha.org/topics/docs/acha_benchmarking_report_2010_utilization_survey.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2014.

  19. Freudenberg N, Manzo L, Mongiello L, Jones H, Boeri N, Lamberson P. Promoting the health of young adults in urban public universities: a case study from City University of New York. J Am Coll Health. 2013; 61(7): 422–430. doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.823972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Likins JM. Research refutes a myth: commuter students do want to be involved. NASPA J. 1991; 29(1): 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alfano H, Eduljee N. Differences in work, levels of involvement, and academic performance between residential and commuter students. Coll Stud J. 2013; 47(2): 334–342.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacoby B. Why involve commuter students in learning? New Dir High Educ. 2000; 2000(109): 3–12. doi:10.1002/he.10901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bing VM. Addressing intimate partner violence on college campuses: strategies and opportunities. NYS Psychol. 2011; 23(2): 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Agoff C, Herrera C, Castro R. The weakness of family ties and their perpetuating effects on gender violence: a qualitative study in Mexico. Violence Women. 2007; 13(11): 1206–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002; 360(9339): 1083–1088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morris MW, Leung K, Ames D, Lickel B. Views from inside and outside: integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Acad Manag Rev. 1999; 24(4): 781–796. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.2553253.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patton M. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34(5): 1189–1208.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coutts A, Kawachi I. The urban social environment and its effects on health. In: Freudenberg N, Galea S, Vlahov D, eds. Cities and the health of the public. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press; 2006: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Beyer K, Wallis AB, Hamberger LK. Neighborhood Environment and Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2013:1524838013515758. doi:10.1177/1524838013515758.

  31. Burke JG, O’Campo P, Peak GL. Neighborhood influences and intimate partner violence: does geographic setting matter? J Urban Health. 2006; 83(2): 182–194. doi:10.1007/s11524-006-9031-z.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Campo P, Gielen AC, Faden RR, Xue X, Kass N, Wang MC. Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85(8 Pt 1): 1092–1097.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Paulsen MB. St. John EP. Social class and college costs: examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. J High Educ. 2002; 73(2): 189–236. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gianoutsos D. Comparing the student profile characteristics between traditional residential and commuter students at a public, research-intensive, urban commuter university. 2011. Available at: http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1926&context=thesesdissertations. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  35. New York City Domestic Violence Fatality Review Committee Annual Report 2013. New York City: Mayor’s Office to Combat Domestic Violence; 2013. Available at: 21 http://www.nyc.gov/html/ocdv/downloads/pdf/Statistics_8th_Annual_Report_Fatality_Review_Committee_2013.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  36. Malik S, Sorenson SB, Aneshensel CS. Community and dating violence among adolescents: perpetration and victimization. J Adolesc Health. 1997; 21(5): 291–302. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(97)00143-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Baum S, Ma J, Payea K. Education Pays 2013: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. New York City: College Board Advocacy and Policy Center; 2013. Available at: http://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/education-pays-2013-full-report.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2014.

  38. Columbia School of Social Work. Grant Awarded to Develop Technology to Abate Intimate Partner Violence. 2011. Available at: http://socialwork.columbia.edu/news-events/grant-awarded-develop-technology-abate-intimate-partner-violence. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  39. American College of Emergency Physicians. Domestic Family Violence. 2007. Available at: http://www.acep.org/Clinical---Practice-Management/Domestic-Family-Violence/. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  40. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening Tools - Domestic Violence. Available at: https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Violence-Against-Women/Screening-Tools--Domestic-Violence. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  41. American Academy of Family Physicians. Violence Position Paper. 2014. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/violence.html. Accessed August 15, 2014.

  42. Fullwood PC. Preventing Family Violence: Community Engagement Makes the Difference. San Francisco: Family Violence Prevention Fund; 2002. Available at: http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/userfiles/file/ImmigrantWomen/PFV-Community%20Engagement.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this project was provided by the Healthy CUNY Initiative at the City University of New York. The authors would like to thank Nick Freudenberg, Patti Lamberson, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma K. Tsui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsui, E.K., Santamaria, E.K. Intimate Partner Violence Risk among Undergraduate Women from an Urban Commuter College: the Role of Navigating Off- and On-Campus Social Environments. J Urban Health 92, 513–526 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9933-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9933-0

Keywords

Navigation