Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of a Temporary Recurrent Street Closure on Physical Activity in New York City

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At least 70 US cities have now introduced ciclovías—large-scale street closures to promote physical activity—joining numerous other cities worldwide that have implemented ciclovías in efforts to improve population health. We assessed the impact of Summer Streets, a New York City program in which 6.9 contiguous miles of urban streets were closed to traffic and opened for walking, cycling, and group activities, such as dancing and yoga, on population physical activity levels. Screen line counts were used to estimate attendance, and a street intercept survey was conducted to assess demographic characteristics of participants, baseline adherence to physical activity recommendations, and type and duration of physical activity at Summer Streets. In addition, a traffic study was used to determine if there were vehicular traffic delays as a result of the program. About 50,000 people participated in Summer Streets; among participating New Yorkers, bicyclists averaged 6.7 miles, runners 4.3 miles, and walkers 3.6 miles, equivalent to 72–86 min of moderate physical activity. Among New Yorkers attending Summer Streets, 24 % reported that they did not routinely engage in moderate- or vigorous-intensity physical activity. These non-routine exercisers engaged in the equivalent of 26–68 min of moderate-intensity physical activity at Summer Streets. Summer Streets served as an enticement for New Yorkers, including those who did not ordinarily meet physical activity recommendations, to engage in physical activity. There were no significant vehicular traffic delays during the program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brownson RC, Boehmer TK, Luke DA. Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: What are the contributors? Annu Rev Public Health. 2005; 26: 421–443.

  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Available at: http://www.health.gov/PAGuidelines/guidelines/default.aspx. Accessed Jan 22 2013.

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data 2007. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/BRFSS/page.asp?cat=PA&yr=2007&state=All#PA. Accessed Aug 24 2013.

  4. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Epiquery: NYC interactive health data 2010. Available at: https://a816-healthpsi.nyc.gov/epiquery/ Accessed Jun 28 2013.

  5. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(1): 181–188.

  6. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: Comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(4): e1000058.

  7. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Guide to community preventive services. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005. Available at: http://www.thecommunityguide.org/library/book/Front-Matter.pdf Accessed Aug 12 2014.

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies to prevent obesity and other chronic diseases: The CDC guide to strategies to increase physical activity in the community. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/PA_2011_WEB.pdf Accessed Aug 12 2014.

  9. Frank LD, Schmid TL, Sallis JF, Chapman J, Saelens BE. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(2 Suppl 2): 117–125.

  10. Suminski RR, Heinrich KM, Poston WS, Hyder M, Pyle S. Characteristics of urban sidewalks/streets and objectively measured physical activity. J Urban Health. 2008; 85(2): 178–190.

  11. Sallis JF, Bowles HR, Bauman A, et al. Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(6): 484–490.

  12. Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(2): 417–424.

  13. Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ, Slater SJ, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. The availability of local-area commercial physical activity-related facilities and physical activity among adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(4 Suppl 1): S292–S300.

  14. Sarmiento O, Torres A, Jacoby E, Pratt M, Schmid TL, Stierling G. The Ciclovía-Recreativa: A mass recreational program with public health potential. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2): S163–S180.

  15. Hipp JA, Eyler AA, Kuhlberg JA. Target population involvement in urban ciclovias: A preliminary evaluation of St. Louis open streets. J Urban Health. 2013; 90(6): 1010–1015.

  16. Montes F, Sarmiento OL, Zarama R, et al. Do health benefits outweigh the costs of mass recreational programs? An economic analysis of four ciclovía programs. J Urban Health. 2012; 89(1): 153–170.

  17. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity. Promoting physical activity: a guide for community action. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1999. Table adapted from Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1993;25(1):71–80. Adapted with technical assistance from Dr. Barbara Ainsworth.

  18. New York City Department of City Planning Population Division. NYC2010 Results from the 2010 census: Population growth and race/Hispanic composition. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/census/census2010/pgrhc.pdf Accessed Aug 14 2013.

  19. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Epiquery: NYC interactive health data system—community health survey 2006. http://nyc.gov/health/epiquery Accessed Aug 14 2014.

  20. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. District public health offices: New York’s commitment to healthier neighborhoods. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/dpho/dpho-brochure.pdf Accessed Aug 14 2013.

  21. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy. State of the city’s housing & neighborhoods, 2012. Available at: http://furmancenter.org/files/sotc/SOC2012.pdf Accessed Aug 14 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Wolf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolf, S.A., Grimshaw, V.E., Sacks, R. et al. The Impact of a Temporary Recurrent Street Closure on Physical Activity in New York City. J Urban Health 92, 230–241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9925-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9925-0

Keywords

Navigation