Skip to main content
Log in

Promoting Health and Advancing Development through Improved Housing in Low-Income Settings

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is major untapped potential to improve health in low-income communities through improved housing design, fittings, materials and construction. Adverse effects on health from inadequate housing can occur through a range of mechanisms, both direct and indirect, including as a result of extreme weather, household air pollution, injuries or burns, the ingress of disease vectors and lack of clean water and sanitation. Collaborative action between public health professionals and those involved in developing formal and informal housing could advance both health and development by addressing risk factors for a range of adverse health outcomes. Potential trade-offs between design features which may reduce the risk of some adverse outcomes whilst increasing the risk of others must be explicitly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braubach M, et al. Environmental burden of disease associated with inadequate housing. Methods for quantifying health impacts of selected housing risks in the WHO European Region. Summary report. Bonn: World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ormandy D, et al. Statistical evidence to support the housing health & safety rating system. Vol. 1— project report. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations. Resource for speakers. Vital statistics. Food. 24 May 2012 [cited 2012]; Available from: http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/briefingpapers/food/vitalstats.shtml

  4. United Nations. Millennium Development Goals 2015. We can end poverty. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/environ.shtml Accessed 6 March 2012. [cited 6 March 2012]; Available from: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/environ.shtml

  5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT 1k house. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/cre/research/1k-house-project.html Accessed 11 February 2012

  6. Mercer JB. Cold—an underrated risk factor for health. Environ Res. 2003; 92(1): 8–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Analitis A, et al. Effects of cold weather on mortality: results from 15 European cities within the PHEWE project. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168(12): 1397–1408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hills J. Fuel poverty: the problem and its measurement. CASE report 69. London: LSE for the Department of Energy and Climate Change; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McMichael AJ, et al. International study of temperature, heat and urban mortality: the ‘ISOTHURM’ project. Int J Epidemiol. 2008; 37(5): 1121–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kovats RS, Hajat S. Heat stress and public health: a critical review. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008; 29: 41–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Healy JD. Excess winter mortality in Europe: a cross country analysis identifying key risk factors. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2003; 57(10): 784–789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Butler S, et al. Problems with damp and cold housing among Pacific families in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2003; 116(1177): U494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vandentorren S, et al. August 2003 heat wave in France: risk factors for death of elderly people living at home. Eur J Public Health. 2006; 16(6): 583–591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Humphreys MA. Outdoor temperatures and comfort indoors. Build Res Pract. 1978; 6(2): 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta S, Shahpar C. The health benefits of interventions to reduce indoor air pollution from solid fuel use: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Energy Sustain Dev. 2004; 8: 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hutton G, et al. Evaluation of the costs and benefits of household energy and health interventions at global and regional levels. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bruce N, et al. In: Jamison DT et al., eds. Indoor air, in disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press and World Bank; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gakidou E, et al. Improving child survival through environmental and nutritional interventions: the importance of targeting interventions toward the poor. JAMA. 2007; 298(16): 1876–1887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindsay SW, Emerson PM, Charlwood JD. Reducing malaria by mosquito-proofing houses. Trends Parasitol. 2002; 18(11): 510–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Njie M, et al. Importance of eaves to house entry by anopheline, but not culicine, mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 2009; 46(3): 505–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Atieli H, et al. House design modifications reduce indoor resting malaria vector densities in rice irrigation scheme area in western Kenya. Malar J. 2009; 8(1): 108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirby MJ, et al. Effect of two different house screening interventions on exposure to malaria vectors and on anaemia in children in The Gambia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9694): 998–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hay SI, et al. Urbanization, malaria transmission and disease burden in Africa. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005; 3(1): 81–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gillies MT, Wilkes TJ. The vertical distribution of some West African mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) over open farmland in a freshwater area of the Gambia. Bull Entomol Res. 1976; 66(01): 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Snow WF. The vertical distribution of flying mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) near an area of irrigated rice-fields in the Gambia. Bull Entomol Res. 1979; 69(04): 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Snow WF. Further observations on the vertical distribution of flying mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in West African savanna. Bull Entomol Res. 1982; 72(04): 695–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Charlwood JD, et al. Raised houses reduce mosquito bites. Malar J. 2003; 2(1): 45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Zulueta J. Malaria and ecosystems: from prehistory to posteradication. Parassitologia. 1994; 36(1–2): 7–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peat JK, Dickerson J, Li J. Effects of damp and mould in the home on respiratory health: a review of the literature. Allergy. 1998; 53(2): 120–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sahakian NM, Park JH, Cox-Ganser JM. Dampness and mold in the indoor environment: implications for asthma. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2008; 28(3): 485–505. vii.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fewtrell L, et al. Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005; 5(1): 42–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Joint Monitoring Program. Progreess on drinking water and sanitation. 2012 update. 2012, UNICEF and WHO.

  34. Cairncross S, Feachem R. Environmental health engineering in the tropics. An introductory text. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cairncross S. Water supply and the urban poor. In: Cairncross S, Hardoy JE, Satterthwaite D, eds. The poor die young: housing and health in Third World cities. London: EarthScan Publications; 1990. Chapter 5, p. 109–126.

  36. Dean J, Hunter PR. Risk of gastrointestinal illness associated with the consumption of rainwater: a systematic review. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(5): 2501–2507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Daoud AK, et al. Quality assessment of roof-harvested rainwater in the West Bank, Palestinian Authority. J Water Health. 2011; 9(3): 525–533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Clasen T, et al. Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007; 334(7597): 782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schmidt WP, Cairncross S. Household water treatment in poor populations: is there enough evidence for scaling up now? Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43(4): 986–992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown J, Clasen T. High adherence is necessary to realize health gains from water quality interventions. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5): e36735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cordeiro R et al. Spatial distribution of the risk of dengue fever in southeast Brazil, 2006–2007. BMC Public Health, 2011. 11.

  42. Moraes LR, Cancio JA, Cairncross S. Impact of drainage and sewerage on intestinal nematode infections in poor urban areas in Salvador, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004; 98(4): 197–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cairncross S, et al. The public and domestic domains in the transmission of disease. Trop Med Int Health. 1996; 1(1): 27–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Curtis V, et al. Hygiene: new hopes, new horizons. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011; 11(4): 312–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Curtis V, Cairncross S. Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003; 3(5): 275–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. M’Gonigle GCM. Nutrition; the position in England to-day. London: Industrial Christian Fellowship; 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jeuland MA, Pattanayak SK. Benefits and costs of improved cookstoves: assessing the implications of variability in health, forest and climate impacts. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2): e30338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. World Health Organization. Health principles of housing. 1989 [cited 29 May 2012]; Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Health+principles+of+housing#0

  49. Public Health Institute of Scotland and MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit. Health impact assessment of housing improvements. A guide. Glasgow: Public Health Institute of Scotland; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wilkinson D. Poor housing and ill health. A summary of researach evidence. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D. Urban poverty in the global south: scale and nature. London: Routledge; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Boonyabancha S. Baan Mankong: going to scale with ‘slum’ and squatter upgrading in Thailand. Environ Urban. 2005; 17(1): 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zero Carbon Compendium. Witsand Community Energy Project. [cited 27 May 2012]; Exemplar Project Case Studies of the Zero Carbon Compendium]. Available from: http://www.lowcarbonhomesworldwide.com/case-studies/countries/south-africa.html

  54. Briceno-Leon R. Rural housing for control of Chagas disease in Venezuela. Parasitol Today. 1987; 3(12): 384–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cecere MC, et al. Effects of partial housing improvement and insecticide spraying on the reinfestation dynamics of Triatoma infestans in rural northwestern Argentina. Acta Trop. 2002; 84(2): 101–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. de Arias Rojas A, et al. Chagas disease vector control through different intervention modalities in endemic localities of Paraguay. Bull World Health Organ. 1999; 77(4): 331–339.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Curtis CF. Appropriate technology in vector control. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fuller-Thomson E, Hulchanski JD, Hwang S. The housing/health relationship: what do we know? Rev Environ Health. 2000; 15(1–2): 109–133.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Burger H, Kaiser HE. Crowding. In Vivo. 1996; 10(2): 249–253.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Egbagbe EE, Okojie OH, Amaize E. Epidemiology of pulmonary tuberculosis in University of Benin Teaching Hospital and Central Hospital, Benin City. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2011; 21(2): 159–162.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Elender F, Bentham G, Langford I. Tuberculosis mortality in England and Wales during 1982–1992: its association with poverty, ethnicity and AIDS. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 46(6): 673–681.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Baker M, et al. Household crowding a major risk factor for epidemic meningococcal disease in Auckland children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000; 19(10): 983–990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Moodley JR, Coetzee N, Hussey G. Risk factors for meningococcal disease in Cape Town. S Afr Med J. 1999; 89(1): 56–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Homoe P, Christensen RB, Bretlau P. Acute otitis media and sociomedical risk factors among unselected children in Greenland. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999; 49(1): 37–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Milne A, et al. A seroepidemiological study of the prevalence of hepatitis B infections in a hyperendemic New Zealand community. Int J Epidemiol. 1987; 16(1): 84–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. McCallion WA, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in children: relation with current household living conditions. Gut. 1996; 39(1): 18–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Brown LM. Helicobacter pylori: epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 2000; 22(2): 283–297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Marsh A, et al. Housing deprivation and health: a longitudinal analysis. Hous Stud. 2000; 15(3): 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Thomson H, et al. The health impacts of housing improvement: a systematic review of intervention studies from 1887 to 2007. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(Suppl 3): S681–S692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Evans GW, Maxwell LE, Hart B. Parental language and verbal responsiveness to children in crowded homes. Dev Psychol. 1999; 35(4): 1020–1023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Evans GW, et al. Chronic residential crowding and children’s well-being: an ecological perspective. Child Dev. 1998; 69(6): 1514–1523.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Fuller TD, et al. Chronic stress and psychological well-being: evidence from Thailand on household crowding. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 42(2): 265–280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Emond AM, et al. The effects of housing on the health of preterm infants. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997; 11(2): 228–239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Schluter PJ, et al. Housing and sudden infant death syndrome. The New Zealand Cot Death Study Group. N Z Med J. 1997; 110(1047): 243–246.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Govindarajan V and C Sarkar. $300 House. 2011 [cited 29 May2012]; Available from: http://www.300house.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?blog_id=2&tag=%24300%20House&limit=20

  76. Hernandez F, et al. Rethinking the informal city. Critical perspectives from Latin America. 2010: Berghahn Books.

  77. Kwok AG, Grondzik WT. The green studio handbook—environmental strategies for schematic design. Oxford: Architectural Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Dherani M, et al. Indoor air pollution from unprocessed solid fuel use and pneumonia risk in under-5 children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(5): 390–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Kurmi OP, et al. COPD and chronic bronchitis risk of indoor air pollution from solid fuel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2010; 65(3): 221–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Po JY, FitzGerald JM, Carlsten C. Respiratory disease associated with solid biomass fuel exposure in rural women and children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2011; 66(3): 232–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Pope DP, et al. Risk of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with indoor air pollution from solid fuel use in developing countries. Epidemiol Rev. 2010; 32(1): 70–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Pope CA 3rd, et al. Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality associated with ambient air pollution and cigarette smoke: shape of the exposure–response relationships. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119(11): 1616–1621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Cairncross S, Valdmanis V. Water supply, sanitation and hygiene promotion. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. eds. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries 2nd ed. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2006. Chapter 41, pp. 771–792.

  84. Bartram J, Cairncross S. Hygiene, sanitation, and water: forgotten foundations of health. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(11): e1000367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lee MS, et al. In-home solid fuel use and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional analysis of the Shanghai Putuo study. Environ Health. 2012; 11: 18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Smith KR, Peel JL. Mind the gap. Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118(12): 1643–1645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Pokhrel AK, et al. Case–control study of indoor cooking smoke exposure and cataract in Nepal and India. Int J Epidemiol. 2005; 34(3): 702–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Zodpey SP, Ughade SN. Exposure to cheaper cooking fuels and risk of age-related cataract in women. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 1999; 3(4): 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Slama K, et al. Indoor solid fuel combustion and tuberculosis: is there an association? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010; 14(1): 6–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kan X, et al. Indoor solid fuel use and tuberculosis in China: a matched case–control study. BMC Publ Health. 2011; 11: 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Gninafon M, et al. Exposure to combustion of solid fuel and tuberculosis: a matched case–control study. Eur Respir J. 2011; 38(1): 132–138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kaplan C. Indoor air pollution from unprocessed solid fuels in developing countries. Rev Environ Health. 2010; 25(3): 221–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sapkota A, et al. Indoor air pollution from solid fuels and risk of hypopharyngeal/laryngeal and lung cancers: a multicentric case–control study from India. Int J Epidemiol. 2008; 37(2): 321–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Pokhrel AK, et al. Tuberculosis and indoor biomass and kerosene use in Nepal: a case–control study. Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118(4): 558–564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Peck MD, et al. Burns and fires from non-electric domestic appliances in low and middle income countries. Part I. The scope of the problem. Burns. 2008; 34(3): 303–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Smith KR, et al. Effect of reduction in household air pollution on childhood pneumonia in Guatemala (RESPIRE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011; 378(9804): 1717–1726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Chapman RS, et al. Improvement in household stoves and risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Xuanwei, China: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2005; 331(7524): 1050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves (An initiative led by the United Nations Foundation). [cited 2012 29 May 2012]; Available from: http://www.cleancookstives.org

  99. World Health Organization. Combined household water treatment and indoor air pollution projects in urban Mambanda, Cameroon and rural Nyanza, Kenya. Geneva: WHO; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Biran A, et al. Smoke and malaria: are interventions to reduce exposure to indoor air pollution likely to increase exposure to mosquitoes? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007; 101(11): 1065–1071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Richard Smith of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine for his helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy Haines.

Appendices

Appendix 1. Commentary on evidence relating to further health outcomes possibly associated with exposure to emissions from indoor solid fuel use

Evidence is also emerging for a number of other outcomes, which were not included in Table 1 as current evidence is limited and/or systematic reviews are not available. We are aware of one study to date of HAP exposure and CVD as an endpoint which reported an odds ratio of 2.58 (1.53, 4.32)85, but several studies of ‘intermediate’ stages and risk factors such as blood pressure have been reported. The analysis of the relationship between PM2.5 from combustion sources (outdoor pollution, second-hand smoke and active smoking) by Pope et al.82 suggests that HAP exposure (with the dose lying between second-hand and active smoking) would be associated with CVD risk.86 Based on this assumption, risks consistent with the reduction in exposure to HAP of 200 μg m−3PM2.5 of 1.204 women and 1.0734 men, respectively, have been proposed.

A small but quite consistent set of studies report an increase risk of cataract.87,88 Reviews have found inconsistent results for TB, however.8991 There is also evidence of links with other cancers, including of the upper aero-digestive tract92,93 and carcinoma of the uterine cervix. All of these links, if confirmed, are consistent with the effects of tobacco smoke.

Kerosene is used for cooking and/or lighting fuel by some 500 million homes and has often been grouped with ‘clean’ fuels, but there are concerns about emissions as well as safety. One recent study reported a very elevated risk of TB associated with kerosene use for lighting and cooking94, and this fuel is well recognized as serious risk for burns, fires and child poisoning.95 Population data on burns and scalds are lacking. A high proportion of the 200,000 annual global burn deaths occur in developing countries, mostly in the home and associated with both liquid and solid fuel use. For every death, there are many more severe injuries, which are often inadequately treated, with severe lifelong consequences for disability and stigma. Electric lighting, whether powered through external connection or in-home solar photovoltaic units, will not only avoid the risk of burns and poisoning but also has zero emissions at the point of use (home).

Intervention studies are beginning to provide evidence that reducing exposure impacts positively on a number of these conditions. The RESPIRE trial has shown a one third reduction in severe pneumonia with use of a chimney stove that halved child exposure (OR = 0·67 (0·45–0·98) p = 0.042)96, while three cohort studies of the impacts of the Chinese national improved stove programme have shown substantial reductions of 25–50 % in lung cancer, COPD97 and adult pneumonia mortality for long-term improved stove users in coal-burning areas.

Although significant challenges in achieving large scale, exclusive use of much cleaner stoves and fuels remain, renewed efforts coordinated by the UN Foundation Alliance for clean cookstoves98 are underway to address the critical technological, financing and market development issues involved. Delivery of cleaner, safer and more efficient household energy solutions as part of an integrated health home package including water and sanitation may offer synergistic benefits in terms of health and programmatic efficiency99, but robust empirical evidence is not yet available.

Questions have been raised about whether a reduction in smoke in the home may increase the risk of vector-borne disease. A systematic review found that, while biting may increase, disease transmission was not affected.100

Appendix 2. Humidity, condensation and mold

Humidity in the dwelling can cause condensation which encourages the growth of fungal spores. Damp is also associated with an increase in house dust mites. Both of these are known allergens. This suggests a causal link between respiratory disease, in particular asthma, and damp and mold.29 In addition, there is an observed dose–response relationship noted with this finding: asthma severity increasing with increasing levels of damp and mold in the home. House dust mites require warmth and humidity to thrive, ideally between 23 and 25 °C with 80–90 % humidity. Keeping a dwelling between 40 and 60 % humidity and improving ventilation decrease the number of mites.

Mold growth occurs when the ventilation is poor and the humidity levels are high. Intervention studies have shown that increasing ventilation and reducing humidity can decrease mold.

Studies use different methods of characterising mold—experts or self-reporting and many do not include confounding factors such as smoking or house type. Even so, there is still a consistent and significant relationship found between respiratory symptoms and damp and mold in dwellings. Whether this is an exacerbation of existing disease or the initiation of new disease is as yet unclear. Reduction of exposure to house dust mites also requires user behaviour for adequate airing of bedding, washing and the fitting of pillow and mattress covers which is unlikely to be practical in low-income settings. Structural factors such as consistent heating and good ventilation do play a role in keeping the exposure down, and further research is needed to better understand the health implications in low-income settings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haines, A., Bruce, N., Cairncross, S. et al. Promoting Health and Advancing Development through Improved Housing in Low-Income Settings. J Urban Health 90, 810–831 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9773-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9773-8

Keywords

Navigation