Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Heart rate regulation during cycle-ergometer exercise via event-driven biofeedback

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the problem of regulating the heart rate response along a predetermined reference profile, for cycle-ergometer exercises designed for training or cardio-respiratory rehabilitation. The controller designed in this study is a non-conventional, non-model-based, proportional, integral and derivative (PID) controller. The PID controller commands can be transmitted as biofeedback auditory commands, which can be heard and interpreted by the exercising subject to increase or reduce exercise intensity. However, in such a case, for the purposes of effectively communicating to the exercising subject a change in the required exercise intensity, the timing of this feedback signal relative to the position of the pedals becomes critical. A feedback signal delivered when the pedals are not in a suitable position to efficiently exert force may be ineffective and this may, in turn, lead to the cognitive disengagement of the user from the feedback controller. This note examines a novel form of control system which has been expressly designed for this project. The system is called an “actuator-based event-driven control system”. The proposed control system was experimentally verified using 24 healthy male subjects who were randomly divided into two separate groups, along with cross-validation scheme. A statistical analysis was employed to test the generalisation of the PID tunes, derived based on the average transfer functions of the two groups, and it revealed that there were no significant differences between the mean values of root mean square of the tracking error of two groups (3.9 vs. 3.7 bpm, \(p = 0.65\)). Furthermore, the results of a second statistical hypothesis test showed that the proposed PID controller with novel synchronised biofeedback mechanism has better performance compared to a conventional PID controller with a fixed-rate biofeedback mechanism (Group 1: 3.9 vs. 5.0 bpm, Group 2: 3.7 vs. 4.4 bpm, \(p <0.05\)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aronow WS (2001) Exercise therapy for older persons with cardiovascular disease. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 10(5):245–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Åström KJ, Hägglund T (2006) Advanced PID control. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society; Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

  3. Baig DEZ, Javed F, Savkin AV, Celler BG (2011) An adaptive \(H_{\infty }\) control design for exercise-independent human heart rate regulation system. In: 9th IEEE international conference on control and automation (ICCA), pp 1033–1036

  4. Cheng TM, Savkin AV, Celler BG, Su SW, Wang L (2008) Nonlinear modeling and control of human heart rate response during exercise with various work load intensities. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(11):2499–2508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V et al (2000) Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 37(6):693–700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper R, Horvath S, Bedi J, Drechsler-Parks D, Williams R (1992) Maximal exercise response of paraplegic wheelchair road racers. Spinal Cord 30(8):573–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Diggle PJ (1990) Time series A biostatistical introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, Chaitman B, Eckel R, Fleg J, Froelicher VF, Leon AS, Piña IL, Rodney R et al (2001) Exercise standards for testing and training a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association. Circulation 104(14):1694–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giardino ND, Lehrer PM, Edelberg R (2002) Comparison of finger plethysmograph to ECG in the measurement of heart rate variability. Psychophysiology 39(2):246–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giggins OM, Persson U, Caulfield B (2013) Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10(1):60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hajek M, Potuček J, Brodan V (1980) Mathematical model of heart rate regulation during exercise. Automatica 16(2):191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heemels W, Sandee J, Van Den Bosch P (2008) Analysis of event-driven controllers for linear systems. Int J Control 81(4):571–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt KJ, Fankhauser SE, Saengsuwan J (2015) Identification of heart rate dynamics during moderate-to-vigorous treadmill exercise. Biomed Eng Online 14(1):117

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawada T, Ikeda Y, Takaki H, Sugimachi M, Kawaguchi O, Shishido T, Sato T, Matsuura W, Miyano H, Sunagawa K (1999) Development of a servo-controller of heart rate using a cycle ergometer. Heart Vessel 14(4):177–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCrory MA, Mole PA, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Dewey KG (1997) Between-day and within-day variability in the relation between heart rate and oxygen consumption: effect on the estimation of energy expenditure by heart-rate monitoring. Am J Clin Nutr 66(1):18–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mersy D (1991) Health benefits of aerobic exercise. Postgrad Med 90(1):103–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Montoya R, Dupui P, Pages B, Bessou P (1994) Step-length biofeedback device for walk rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput 32(4):416–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Paradiso M, Pietrosanti S, Scalzi S, Tomei P, Verrelli CM (2013) Experimental heart rate regulation in cycle-ergometer exercises. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(1):135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petrofsky J (2003) New algorithm to control a cycle ergometer using electrical stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 41(1):18–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robergs RA, Landwehr R (2002) The surprising history of the “hrmax= 220-age” equation. J Exerc Physiol 5(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  21. Su SW, Huang S, Wang L, Celler BG, Savkin AV, Guo Y, Cheng T (2007) Nonparametric Hammerstein model based model predictive control for heart rate regulation. In: IEEE-EMBS, pp 2984–2987

  22. Su SW, Huang S, Wang L, Celler BG, Savkin AV, Guo Y, Cheng TM (2010) Optimizing heart rate regulation for safe exercise. Ann Biomed Eng 38(3):758–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Su SW, Wang L, Celler BG, Savkin A (2006) Heart rate control during treadmill exercise. In: IEEE-EMBS, pp 2471–2474

  24. Su SW, Wang L, Celler BG, Savkin AV, Guo Y (2007) Identification and control for heart rate regulation during treadmill exercise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(7):1238–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshino K, Adachi K, Ihochi K, Matsuoka K (2007) Modeling effects of age and sex on cardiovascular variability responses to aerobic ergometer exercise. Med Biol Eng Comput 45(11):1085–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology, Sydney, Broadway, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Ahmadreza Argha & Steven W. Su

  2. School of Electrical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Branko G. Celler

Authors
  1. Ahmadreza Argha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven W. Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Branko G. Celler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmadreza Argha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Argha, A., Su, S.W. & Celler, B.G. Heart rate regulation during cycle-ergometer exercise via event-driven biofeedback. Med Biol Eng Comput 55, 483–492 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1530-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1530-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation