Skip to main content
Log in

Metastatic liver tumour segmentation with a neural network-guided 3D deformable model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The segmentation of liver tumours in CT images is useful for the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. Furthermore, an accurate assessment of tumour volume aids in the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment response. Currently, segmentation is performed manually by an expert, and because of the time required, a rough estimate of tumour volume is often done instead. We propose a semi-automatic segmentation method that makes use of machine learning within a deformable surface model. Specifically, we propose a deformable model that uses a voxel classifier based on a multilayer perceptron (MLP) to interpret the CT image. The new deformable model considers vertex displacement towards apparent tumour boundaries and regularization that promotes surface smoothness. During operation, a user identifies the target tumour and the mesh then automatically delineates the tumour from the MLP processed image. The method was tested on a dataset of 40 abdominal CT scans with a total of 95 colorectal metastases collected from a variety of scanners with variable spatial resolution. The segmentation results are encouraging with a Dice similarity metric of \(0.80 \pm 0.11\) and demonstrates that the proposed method can deal with highly variable data. This work motivates further research into tumour segmentation using machine learning with more data and deeper neural networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Ssstrunk S (2010) Slic superpixels. Technical report

  2. Baladhandapani A, Nachimuthu DS (2014) Evolutionary learning of spiking neural networks towards quantification of 3D MRI brain tumor tissues. Soft Comput 19(7):1803–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapiro J, Duran R, Lin M, Schernthaner RE, Wang Z, Gorodetski B, Geschwind JF (2015) Identifying staging markers for hepatocellular carcinoma before transarterial chemoembolization: comparison of three-dimensional quantitative versus nonthree-dimensional imaging markers. Radiology 275(2):438–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen AB, Diamant I, Klang E, Amitai M, Greenspan H (2014) Automatic detection and segmentation of liver metastatic lesions on serial CT examinations. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics 903519–903519

  5. Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Syst 2(4):303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahl G, Sainath T, Hinton G (2013) Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp 8609–8613

  7. Durst C, Tustison N, Wintermark M, Avants B (2013) Ants and Rboles. In: Proceedings of BRATS Challenge—MICCAI

  8. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hame Y (2008) Liver tumor segmentation using implicit surface evolution. Midas J. http://hdl.handle.net/10380/1440

  10. Havaei M, Davy A, Warde-Farley D, Biard A, Courville A, Bengio Y, Pal C, Jodoin PM, Larochelle H (2015) Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.03540

  11. Heimann T, Van Ginneken B, Styner M, Arzhaeva Y, Aurich V, Bauer C, Beck A, Becker C, Beichel R, Bekes G et al (2009) Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from ct datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(8):1251–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochreiter S (1998) The vanishing gradient problem during learning recurrent neural nets and problem solutions. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 6(02):107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang M, Yang W, Wu Y, Jiang J, Chen W, Feng Q (2014) Brain tumor segmentation based on local independent projection-based classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(10):2633–2645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kadoury S, Vorontsov E, Tang A (2015) Metastatic liver tumour segmentation from discriminant grassmannian manifolds. Phys Med Biol 60(16):6459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kainmueller D, Lamecker H, Heller MO, Weber B, Hege HC, Zachow S (2013) Omnidirectional displacements for deformable surfaces. Med Image Anal 17(4):429–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khotanlou H, Colliot O, Atif J, Bloch I (2009) 3D brain tumor segmentation in MRI using fuzzy classification, symmetry analysis and spatially constrained deformable models. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(10):1457–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Pereira F, Burges CJC, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 25. Curran Associates Inc, Red Hook, pp 1097–1105

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nair V, Hinton GE (2010) Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), pp 807–814

  19. Plaut DC, Hinton GE (1987) Learning sets of filters using back-propagation. Comput Speech Lang 2(1):35–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qi Y, Xiong W, Leow WK, Tian Q, Zhou J, Liu J, Han T, Venkatesh SK, Wang SC (2008) Semi-automatic segmentation of liver tumors from CT scans using Bayesian rule-based 3d region growing. In: MICCAI Workshop, vol 41, pp 201

  21. Rajendran A, Dhanasekaran R (2012) Fuzzy clustering and deformable model for tumor segmentation on MRI brain image: a combined approach. Procedia Eng 30:327–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stawiaski J, Decenciere E, Bidault F (2008) Interactive liver tumor segmentation using graph-cuts and watershed. In: Workshop on 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge II. Liver tumor segmentation challenge. MICCAI, New York, USA

  23. Vorontsov E, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Kadoury S (2014) Metastatic liver tumor segmentation using texture-based omni-directional deformable surface models. In: Yoshida H, Nppi JJ, Saini S (ed) Abdominal imaging. Computational and clinical applications. Number 8676 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, pp 74–83

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research funding was supported in part by the Canada Research Chairs and the NSERC Discovery grant programme and the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS-ARQ #26993).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Kadoury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vorontsov, E., Tang, A., Roy, D. et al. Metastatic liver tumour segmentation with a neural network-guided 3D deformable model. Med Biol Eng Comput 55, 127–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1495-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1495-8

Keywords

Navigation