Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting long-term wear performance of hard-on-hard bearing couples: effect of cup orientation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wear is the major cause of implant failure, resulting in expensive revision surgeries of total hip arthroplasty. Therefore, understanding of wear mechanism and its progression is crucial to improve the physiological performance of implants. This paper presents a three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) wear modeling approach to estimate evolution of wear in hard-on-hard bearing components with the effect of cup abduction angle. Three bearing couples were considered, and they were PCD-on-PCD, Al2O3-on-Al2O3 and Si3N4-on-Si3N4, while the cup abduction angle varied from 35° to 70° with an increment of 5°. By adopting actual physiological hip gait loading and rotational movement for normal walking cycle in FE modeling, the contact pressure and the sliding distance were calculated to predict wear. A femoral head of 32 mm in diameter was considered, while a constant frictional contact at the inference between head and cup was used. During simulation, the geometry of cup surface was updated at a reasonable interval of gait cycles to consider the effect of wear. Wear was simulated for up to 20 million cycles which is an equivalent of 20 years of implant’s life in human body. Simulation results showed that compared to other two bearing couples, the predicted linear and volumetric wear in PCD-on-PCD couple exhibited the least wear evolution for all cup angles considered. The increase in abduction angle from 35° to 70° decreases the volumetric wear by 28 % for all three bearing couples, due to the reduction in sliding distance. Steep cup angle, e.g., 70° for Al2O3 and Si3N4 bearing couples, encountered edge contact, which leads to more wear. Further, wear results were discussed and analyzed with respect to in vitro and/or clinical studies available in the literature to justify the efficacy of wear modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Affatato S, Bersaglia G, Foltran I, Emiliani D, Traina F, Toni A (2004) The influence of implant position on the wear of alumina-on-alumina studied in a hip simulator. Wear 256:400–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Akazawa M, Kato K, Umeya K (1986) Wear properties of silicon nitride in rolling contact. Wear 110:285–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Archard J (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24:981–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahraminasab M, Sahari BB, Edwards KL, Farahmand F, Arumugam M (2013) Aseptic loosening of femoral components—materials engineering and design considerations. Mater Des 44:155–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bal BS, Khandkar A, Lakshminarayanan R, Clarke I, Hoffman AA, Rahaman MN (2009) Fabrication and testing of silicon nitride bearings in total hip arthroplasty: winner of the 2007 “HAP” PAUL Award. J Arthroplasty 24:110–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bal BS, Rahaman M (2012) Orthopedic applications of silicon nitride ceramics. Acta Biomater 8:2889–2898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barreto S, Folgado J, Fernandes PR, Monteiro J (2010) The influence of the pelvic bone on the computational results of the acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis. J Biomech Eng 132:054503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda G (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34:859–871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bizot P, Nizard R, Lerouge S, Prudhommeaux F, Sedel L (2000) Ceramic/ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 5:622–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buford A, Goswami T (2004) Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: Paper I—general. Mater Des 25:385–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen FS, Di Cesare PE, Kale AA, Lee JF, Frankel VH, Stuchin SA, Zuckerman JD (1998) Results of cemented metal-backed acetabular components: a 10-year-average follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 13:867–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cinotti G, Lucioli N, Malagoli A, Calderoli C, Cassese F (2011) Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning? Int Orthop 35:317–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis JR (2001) Surface engineering for corrosion and wear resistance. ASM international, Almere

    Google Scholar 

  14. Essner A, Sutton K, Wang A (2005) Hip simulator wear comparison of metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-ceramic and crosslinked UHMWPE bearings. Wear 259:992–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harding D, Blackburn D, Loesener G, Dixon R, Nguyen B (2011) Wear rate comparison between polycrystalline diamond, CoCr, and UHMWPE in high wear environments. Proceedings of the international society for advanced spine surgery (ISASS) conference

  16. Harun MN, Wang F, Jin Z, Fisher J (2009) Long-term contact-coupled wear prediction for metal-on-metal total hip joint replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part [J] 223:993–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T, Saito T, Hirasawa Y, Kubo T (2001) Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ingham E, Fisher J (2000) Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 214:21–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin Z, Heng S, Ng H, Auger D (1999) An axisymmetric contact model of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene cups against metallic femoral heads for artificial hip joint replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 213:317–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalayarasan M, Prakash L, Shankar S (2013) Material selection of acetabular component in human hip prosthesis using finite element concepts. Int J Exp Comput Biomech 2:118–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang L, Galvin A, Jin Z, Fisher J (2006) A simple fully integrated contact-coupled wear prediction for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene hip implants. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220:33–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kennedy J, Rogers W, Soffe K, Sullivan R, Griffen D, Sheehan L (1998) Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 13:530–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu F, Leslie I, Williams S, Fisher J, Jin Z (2008) Development of computational wear simulation of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacements. J Biomech 41:686–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nevelos J, Ingham E, Doyle C, Nevelos A, Fisher J (2001) The influence of acetabular cup angle on the wear of “BIOLOX Forte” alumina ceramic bearing couples in a hip joint simulator. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12:141–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Okazaki Y (2014) Effect of head size on wear properties of metal-on-metal bearings of hip prostheses, and comparison with wear properties of metal-on-polyethylene bearings using hip simulator. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 31:152–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olofsson J, Grehk TM, Berlind T, Persson C, Jacobson S, Engqvist H (2012) Evaluation of silicon nitride as a wear resistant and resorbable alternative for total hip joint replacement. Biomatter 2:94–102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC, ColwellJr CW, D’Lima DD (2003) Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J Bone Joint Surg 85:56–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Queiroz R, Oliveira A, Trigo F, Lopes J (2013) A finite element method approach to compare the wear of acetabular cups in polyethylene according to their lateral tilt in relation to the coronal plane. Wear 298:8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Quental C, Folgado J, Fernandes PR, Monteiro J (2015) Computational analysis of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reverse shoulder prostheses. Med Biol Eng Comput 53:111–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rijavec B, Košak R, Daniel M, Kralj-IgliČ V, Dolinar D (2015) Effect of cup inclination on predicted contact stress-induced volumetric wear in total hip replacement. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18:1468–1473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sariali E, Stewart T, Jin Z, Fisher J (2010) In vitro investigation of friction under edge-loading conditions for ceramic-on-ceramic total hip prosthesis. J Orthop Res 28:979–985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz HC (1994) The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis

  33. Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, Akizuki KH, Frankel RE, Belcher G, Amstutz HC (1998) Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 80:54–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shankar S, Manikandan M (2014) Dynamic contact analysis of total hip prosthesis during stumbling cycle. J Mech Med Biol 14:1450041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shankar S, Nithyaprakash R (2014) Effect of radial clearance on wear and contact pressure of hard-on-hard hip prostheses using finite element concepts. Tribol Trans 57:814–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shankar S, Nithyaprakash R (2014) Wear prediction on silicon nitride bearing couple in human hip prosthesis using finite element concepts. Proc Inst Mech Eng [J] 228:717–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shankar S, Prakash L, Kalayarasan M (2013) Finite element analysis of different contact bearing couples for human hip prosthesis. Int J Biomed Eng Technol 11:66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Takadoum J, Houmid-Bennani H, Mairey D (1998) The wear characteristics of silicon nitride. J Eur Ceram Soc 18:553–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tipper J, Firkins P, Besong A, Barbour P, Nevelos J, Stone M, Ingham E, Fisher J (2001) Characterisation of wear debris from UHMWPE on zirconia ceramic, metal-on-metal and alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses generated in a physiological anatomical hip joint simulator. Wear 250:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tipper J, Hatton A, Nevelos J, Ingham E, Doyle C, Streicher R, Nevelos A, Fisher J (2002) Alumina–alumina artificial hip joints. Part II: characterisation of the wear debris from in vitro hip joint simulations. Biomaterials 23:3441–3448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Turley G, Griffin D, Williams M (2014) Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. Med Biol Eng Comput 52:685–694

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Uddin M (2015) Contact of dual mobility implants: effects of cup wear and inclination. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18:1611–1621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Uddin M (2014) Influence of bearing geometry and material on the contact of dual mobility implants: a finite element analysis. Int J Biomed Eng Technol 15:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Uddin M, Zhang L (2013) Predicting the wear of hard-on-hard hip joint prostheses. Wear 301:192–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Shankar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shankar, S., Gowthaman, K. & Uddin, M.S. Predicting long-term wear performance of hard-on-hard bearing couples: effect of cup orientation. Med Biol Eng Comput 54, 1541–1552 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1440-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1440-2

Keywords

Navigation