Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Player Preferences and Social Harm: An Analysis of the Relationships Between Player Characteristics, Gambling Modes, and Problem Gambling

  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To explore the structure of gambling participation and its association with problem gambling, we draw upon Caillois’s distinction between games based on competition (i.e. agôn) and those based on chance (i.e. alea). The idea that alea and agôn are socially patterned and associated with differing levels of problem gambling, as measured by the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI), was empirically tested using data from the 2005 Northern Territory Gambling Prevalence Survey (Australia). This survey collected information on gambling participation, problem gambling, and a range of socio-demographic variables from a representative sample of the Northern Territory adult population. Principal Components Analysis of participation in eight different gambling activities was used to explore the underlying structure of participation. Subsequently, regression was used to identify associations between dimensions of participation, social characteristics, and problem gambling. While a two-factor solution supported a basic distinction between agonistic and aleatory games, the third factor of a three-factor solution combined the two categories, indicating that activity preferences are more complex than the agôn-alea duality would suggest. There were significant associations between the two-factor solution and socio-demographic variables including geographic remoteness, age, gender, and household type. No association was found between alea, agôn and the CPGI, suggesting that it is the configuration of specific games, rather the broad structure of activities, that influence problem gambling risk. In terms of harm minimisation, strategies that target specific gambling games may be more effective than those that cover a range of gambling modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., & Rönnberg, S. (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of gambling studies, 20(3), 237–258. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040278.08853.c0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007). Regional population growth, Australia, 2006–07 Cat. no. 3218.0. Canberra: Australia Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Collateral casualties of consumerism. J Consum Cult, 7(1), 25–56. doi:10.1177/1469540507073507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, B. J. (2007). Sociological speculations on treating problem gamblers: a clinical sociological imagination via a bio-psycho-social-sociological model. American behavioral scientist, 51(1), 122–138. doi:10.1177/0002764207304860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, B. J., & Preston, F. W. (2007). Introduction—Sociologies of problem gambling. American behavioral scientist, 51(1), 3–7. doi:10.1177/0002764207305502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, C., Hasin, D. S., Petry, N., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2006). Sex differences in subclinical and DSM-IV pathological gambling: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychological medicine, 36, 943–953. doi:10.1017/S0033291706007410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnaire, C., Bungener, C., & Varescon, I. (2006). Pathological gambling and sensation seeking—How do gamblers playing games of chance in cafes differ from those who bet on horses at the racetrack? Addiction Research and Theory, 14(6), 619–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm, & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics (pp. 99–136). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. (1961). Man, Play, and Games (M. Barash, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Abbott, M., Tse, S., Townsend, S., Kingi, P., & Manaia, W. (2006). Gender, age, ethnic and occupational associations with pathological gambling in a New Zealand urban sample. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrave, J. F. (ed) (2006). The Sociology of Risk and Gambling Reader. New York: Routledge.

  • Cosgrave, J., & Klassen, T. R. (2001). Gambling against the state: the state and the legitimation of gambling. Current sociology, 49(5), 1–15. doi:10.1177/0011392101495002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Yu, N., Afifi, T. O., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). A national survey of gambling problems in Canada. Canadian journal of psychiatry, 50(4), 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction, 101(4), 570–580. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01392.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, B., McMillen, J., & Marshall, D. (2007). A GIS-based investigation of gaming venue catchments. Transactions in GIS, 11, 245–265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01061.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, T. (1995). Pathological gambling: A comparison of gambling at German-style slot machines and “Classical” gambling. Journal of gambling studies, 11(3), 249–263. doi:10.1007/BF02104792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. (2000). Measuring the prevalence of sector-specific problem gambling: a study of casino patrons. Journal of gambling studies, 16(1), 25–51. doi:10.1023/A:1009479300400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, J. H. (1984). Gambling: a sociological review. Annals of the Association of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474, 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1999). Gambling technologies: Prospects for problem gambling. Journal of gambling studies, 15(3), 265–283. doi:10.1023/A:1023053630588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., & Delfabbro, P. (2001). The biopsychosocial approach to gambling: contextual factors in research and clinical Interventions. eGambling, 5, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2001). Profiling lady luck: an empirical study of gambling and problem gambling amongst female club members. Journal of gambling studies, 17(1), 47–69. doi:10.1023/A:1016640332005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2006). Men and women playing games: gender and the gambling preferences of Iowa gambling treatment program participants. Journal of gambling studies, 22(1), 65–80. doi:10.1007/s10899-005-9003-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, C. (2005). Desire and the consumption of danger: Electronic gaming machines and the commodification of interiority. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(6), 523–534. doi:10.1080/16066350500338161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. C. (1999). Adelaide’s pokie geography: distribution of, and expenditure on, electronic gaming machines in Adelaide, South Australian. Geographical journal, 98, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. C. (2005). The gambling environment and gambler behaviour: evidence from Richmond-Tweed, Australia. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 63–83. doi:10.1080/14459790500099471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. C., & Baker, R. G. V. (2001a). Clubs, spades, diamonds and disadvantage: the geography of electronic gaming machines in Melbourne. Australian geographical studies, 39(1), 17–33. doi:10.1111/1467-8470.00127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. C., & Baker, R. G. V. (2001b). Unfair odds? Factors influencing the distribution of electronic gaming machines in Melbourne. Urban policy and research, 19(1), 77–92. doi:10.1080/08111140108727864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. C., & Baker, R. G. V. (2002). The evolving market structures of gambling: case studies modelling the socioeconomic assignment of gaming machines in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Journal of gambling studies, 18(3), 273–291. doi:10.1023/A:1016847305942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. C., McMillen, J., Niemeyer, S., & Doran, B. (2004). Gaming Machine Accessibility and Use in Suburban Canberra: A Detailed Analysis of the Tuggeranong Valley. Canberrra: The Centre for Gambling Research, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, J., & Doran, B. (2006). Problem gambling and gaming machine density: socio-spatial analysis of three Victorian localities. International Gambling Studies, 6(1), 5–29. doi:10.1080/14459790600644093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, V. (2004). How do we know what we know? Epistemic tensions in social and cultural research on gambling 1980–2000. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, (11), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, V., Droessler, J., Nixon, G., & Grimshaw, M. (2002). Recent Research in the Socio-Cultural Domain of Gaming and Gambling: An Annotated Bibliography and Critical Overview. Lethbridge, Alberta: University of Lethbridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, P., Delfabbro, P. H., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Melbourne: National Gambling Research Program Working Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, M., & Whetton, S. (2002). An Assessment of the Impact of Gaming Machines on Small Regional Economies. Adelaide: South Australian Centre for Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, M. P. M. T., & Silva, M. T. A. (2001). A comparison of horse-race, bingo, and video poker gamblers in Brazilian gambling settings. Journal of gambling studies, 17(2), 137–149. doi:10.1023/A:1016672630220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, K., & Webster, D. (2000). The consumption of gambling in everyday life. Journal of consumer studies and home economics, 24(4), 263–271. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2737.2000.00161.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M. (2003). A comparison of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity. Addiction, 58(3), 645–655. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00336.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries: Inquiry Report No.10. Melbourne: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2004). Economic Implications of an Aging Australia: Draft research report. Canberra: Productivity Commission Retrieved November 24, 2004, from http:// www.pc.gov.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reith, G. (1999). The Age of Chance: Gambling in Western Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reith, G. (2007a). Gambling and the contradictions of consumption: a genealogy of the “pathological” subject. American behavioral scientist, 51(1), 33–55. doi:10.1177/0002764207304856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reith, G. (2007b). Situating gambling studies. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and Measurement Issues in Gambling Studies (pp. 1–28). Burlington: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander, B. J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a research synthesis. American journal of public health, 89(9), 1369–1375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. J., & Campbell, C. S. (2007). Tensions and contentions: an examination of electronic gaming issues in Canada. American behavioral scientist, 51(1), 86–101. doi:10.1177/0002764207304854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Austalian Centre for Economic Studies (2005). Community Impacts of Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling (Part A), Department of Justice, State of Victoria, Melbourne.

  • Volberg, R. A., & Wray, M. (2007). Legal gambling and problem gambling as mechanisms of social domination? Some considerations for future research. American behavioral scientist, 51(1), 56–85. doi:10.1177/0002764207304844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. E. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104(4), 250–256. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00336.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, H., Sproston, K., Orford, J., Erens, B., Griffiths, M., Constantine, R., et al. (2007). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. London: National Centre for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S: results from a national survey. Journal of gambling studies, 18(4), 313–337. doi:10.1023/A:1021019915591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive behaviors, 29(2), 323–335. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M-C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2007). Type of gambling and availability of risk factors for problem gambling: a tobit regression analysis by age and gender. International Gambling Studies, 7(2), 183–198. doi:10.1080/14459790701387543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). The deployment of personal luck: sympathetic magic and illusory control in games of pure chance. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 28, 388–1397. doi:10.1177/014616702236870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J., & Enzle, M. E. (2003). The effects of near wins and losses on self-perceived personal luck and subsequent gambling behaviour. Journal of experimental social psychology, 39, 184–191. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00525-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J., Young, M. M., & Hart, K. E. (2005). Untreated young gamblers with game-specific problems: Self-concept involving luck, gambling ecology and delay in seeking professional treatment. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(5), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Abu-Duhou, I., Barnes, T., Creed, E., Morris, M., Stevens, M., et al. (2006). Northern Territory Gambling Prevalence Survey 2005. Darwin: School for Social and Policy Research, Charles Darwin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Barnes, T., Stevens, M., Paterson, M., & Morris, M. (2007). The changing landscape of Indigenous gambling in Northern Australia: current knowledge and future directions. International Gambling Studies, 7, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Stevens, M., & Morris, M. (2008). Problem gambling within the non-Indigenous population of the Northern Territory of Australia: a multivariate analysis of risk factors. International Gambling Studies, 8(1), 77–93. doi:10.1080/14459790701870571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

    Martin Young & Matthew Stevens

Authors
  1. Martin Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Stevens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, M., Stevens, M. Player Preferences and Social Harm: An Analysis of the Relationships Between Player Characteristics, Gambling Modes, and Problem Gambling. Int J Ment Health Addiction 7, 262–279 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-008-9185-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-008-9185-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation