Abstract
Richard Rorty’s philosophy has two basic commitments: one to postmodernism and the other to liberalism. However, these commitments generate tension. As a postmodernist, he sharply criticizes the Enlightenment; as a liberal, he forcefully defends it. His postmodernist liberalism actually explains liberalism using irrationalism.
摘要
罗蒂哲学有两个基本承诺, 一个是对后现代主义的承诺, 一个是对自由主义的承诺。 但是这两种承诺之间存在着紧张关系: 作为后现代主义者, 罗蒂对启蒙提出了强烈的批评; 作为自由主义者, 他又在极力地维护启蒙。 罗蒂的后现代自由主义实质上是以非理性主义来解释自由主义。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennington G. (1988). Lyotard. New York: Columbia University Press
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rorty, R. (1991a). Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism. In: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rorty, R. (1991b). The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy. In: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rorty, R. (1997). Is “Post-modernism” Relevant to Politics? In: Truth, Politics and “Post-modernism.” Assen: Van Gorcum
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by Xiang Yunhua from Jianghai Xuekan 江海学刊 (Jianghai Academic Journal), 2007, (1): 57–61
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, D. Postmodernist liberalism: A critique of Richard Rorty’s political philosophy. Front. Philos. China 3, 455–463 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-008-0029-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-008-0029-3