Abstract
The radical forms of naturalistic epistemology look more like revolutionary manifestos than a reasonable alternatives. A modest form of naturalism is worth promoting. This modest form can cooperate with hermeneutics to solve epistemic problems, and therefore wins the title of cooperative naturalism, and benefits from the hermeneutic account of experience. Cooperative naturalism somewhat bridges the gap between analytic and continental philosophy.
摘要
自然主义认识论的激进形式似乎更像革命宣言, 而非合理的方案。 值得提倡的是一种温和的自然主义。 它能与解释学协作地解决认识论问题, 故而称为协作的自然主义。 协作的自然主义接受了解释学对经验概念的挹注, 弥合了分析哲学和大陆哲学之间的裂痕。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbib MA, Hesse MB (1986). The Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bourdieu P (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Code L (1996). What is natural about epistemology naturalized? American Philosophical Quarterly, 33(1): 1–22
de Caro M, Macarthur D (2004). Introduction: The nature of naturalism. In: De Caro M and Macarthur D eds. Naturalism in Question. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1–17
Feldman R (2001). Naturalized epistemology. In: Zalta E N, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2001/entries/epistemology-naturalized
Haack S (1993). Inquiry and Evidence. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers
Gadamer H G (1989). Truth and Method. (in English, trans. Weinsheimer J and Marshall D). New York: Crossroad
Kertesz A (2002). On the de-naturalization of epistemology. Journal for General Philosophy of Scienc, 33: 269–288
Kim J (2000). What is naturalized epistemology? In: Sosa E and Kim J, eds. Epistemology: An Anthology. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 301–313
Kitcher P (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review, 101: 53–114
Lennon K (2003). Naturalizing and interpretive turns in epistemology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 11(3): 245–259
Maffie J (1995a). Towards an anthropology of epistemology. The Philosophical Forum, 26(3): 218–224
Maffie, James (1995b). Naturalism, scientism and the independence of epistemology. Erkenntnis, 43: 1–27
McDowell J (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Pihlstrom S (2002). The naturalism debate and the development of European philosophy. Philosophy Today, 46(1): 102–111
Price H (2004). Naturalism without representationalism. In: de Caro M and Macarthur D eds. Naturalism in Question. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 71–90
Quine W V (1969a). Natural kinds. In: Quine W V, ed. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 114–138
Quine W V (1969b). Epistemology naturalized. In: Quine W V, ed. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 69–90
Sklar Lawrence (2001). Naturalism and the interpretation of theories. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 75(2): 43–58
Snow C P (1964). The Two Cultures: And a Second Look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by Wang Huaping from Ziran Bianzhengfa Tongxun 自然辩证法通讯 (Journal of Dialectics of Nature), 2006, (4): 31–36
About this article
Cite this article
Huaping, W., Xiaoming, S. Cooperative naturalism. Front. Philos. China 2, 601–613 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-007-0039-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-007-0039-6