Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective allocation of measuring system based on binary particle swarm optimization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Abstract

Due to the size and complexity of power network and the cost of monitoring and telecommunication equipment, it is unfeasible to monitor the whole system variables. All system analyzers use voltages and currents of the network. Thus, monitoring scheme plays a main role in system analysis, control, and protection. To monitor the whole system using distributed measurements, strategic placement of them is needed. This paper improves a topological circuit observation method to minimize essential monitors. Besides the observability under normal condition of power networks, the observability of abnormal network is considered. Consequently, a high level of system reliability is carried out. In terms of reliability constraint, identification of bad measurement data in a given measurement system by making theme sure to be detectable is well done. Furthermore, it is maintained by a certain level of reliability against the single-line outages. Thus, observability is satisfied if all possible single line outages are plausible. Consideration of these limitations clears the role of utilizing an optimization algorithm. Hence, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to minimize monitoring cost and removing unobservable states under abnormal condition, simultaneously. The algorithm is tested in IEEE 14 and 30-bus test systems and Iranian (Mazandaran) Regional Electric Company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bollen M H J. Understanding Power Quality Previous Problems: Voltage Sags and Interruptions. Wiley-IEEE Press, 2000

  2. Ahmadi Y, Alinejad-Beromi Y, Moradi M. Optimal PMU placement for power system observability using binary particle swarm optimization and considering measurement redundancy. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(6): 7263–7269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sodhi R, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. Optimal PMU placement method for complete topological and numerical observability of power system. Electric Power Systems Research, 2010, 80(9): 1154–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chakrabarti S, Kyriakides E. Optimal placement of phasor measurement units for power system observability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(3): 1433–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Won D J, Moon S I. Optimal number and locations of power quality monitors considering system topology. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2008, 23(1): 288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abur A, Gómez A E. Power System State Estimation: Theory and Implementation. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2004

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Rakpenthai C, Premrudeepreechacharn S, Uatrongjitb S, Watson N R. Measurement placement for power system state estimation using decomposition technique. Electric Power Systems Research, 2005, 75(1): 41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Phadke A G, Thorp J S. Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Application. New York: Springer, 2008

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Korres G N, Manousakis N M. State estimation and bad data processing for systems including PMU and SCADA measurements. Electric Power Systems Research, 2011, 81(7): 1514–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jabr R A. Power system state estimation using an iteratively reweighted least squares method for sequential L1-regression. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2006, 28(2): 86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eldery M A, El-Saadany E F, Salama M M A, Vannelli A. A novel power quality monitoring allocation algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2006, 21(2): 768–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Abur A. Placement of PMUs to enable bad data detection in state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(4): 1608–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu B, Abur A. Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs. In: Proceedings of IEEE Power System Conference and Exposition. 2004, 2: 943–946

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang X, Zhang X P, Zhou S Y. Coordinated algorithms for distributed state estimation with synchronized phasor measurements. Applied Energy, 2012, 96: 253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milosevic B, Begovic M. Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for optimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(1): 69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy J, Eberhart R C. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1997, 5: 4104–4109

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gomez M, Lopez A, Jurado F. Optimal placement and sizing from standpoint of the investor of photovoltaics grid-connected systems using binary particle swarm optimization. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(6): 1911–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Engelbrecht A P. Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. John Wiley and Sons, 2007, ch. 16: 289–358

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalil Gorgani Firouzjah.

About this article

Cite this article

Firouzjah, K.G., Sheikholeslami, A. & Barforoushi, T. Multi-objective allocation of measuring system based on binary particle swarm optimization. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. 7, 399–415 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-012-0213-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-012-0213-z

Keywords

Navigation