Skip to main content
Log in

Urban carbon footprint and carbon cycle pressure: The case study of Nanjing

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban carbon footprint reflects the impact and pressure of human activities on urban environment. Based on city level, this paper estimated carbon emissions and carbon footprint of Nanjing city, analyzed urban carbon footprint intensity and carbon cycle pressure and discussed the influencing factors of carbon footprint through LMDI decomposition model. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The total carbon emissions of Nanjing increased rapidly since 2000, in which the carbon emission from the use of fossil energy was the largest. Meanwhile, carbon sinks of Nanjing presented a declining trend since 2000, which caused the decrease of carbon compensation rate and the increase of urban carbon cycle pressure. (2) The total carbon footprint of Nanjing increased rapidly since 2000, and the carbon deficit was more than ten times of total land areas of Nanjing in 2009, which means Nanjing confronted high carbon cycle pressure. (3) Generally, carbon footprint intensity of Nanjing was on decrease and the carbon footprint productivity was on increase. This indicated that energy utilization rate and carbon efficiency of Nanjing was improved since 2000, and the policy for energy conservation and emission reduction taken by Nanjing’s government received better effects. (4) Economic development, population and industrial structure are promoting factors for the increase of carbon footprint of Nanjing, while the industrial carbon footprint intensity was inhibitory factor. (5) Several countermeasures should be taken to decrease urban carbon footprint and alleviate carbon cycle pressure, such as: improvement of the energy efficiency, industrial structure reconstruction, afforestation and environmental protection and land use control. Generally, transition to low-carbon economy is essential for Chinese cities to realize sustainable development in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adom F, Maes A, Workman C et al., 2012. Regional carbon footprint analysis of dairy feeds for milk production in the USA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17: 520–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aichele R, Felbermayr G, 2012. Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63: 336–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi A A, Demonsabert S M, 2012. Estimating the carbon footprint of the municipal water cycle. Journal American Water Works Association, 104: 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • BP, 2007. What on earth is a carbon footprint? http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloads/A/ABP_ADV_what_on_earth_is_a_carbon_footprint.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang N B, Qi C, Yang Y J, 2012. Optimal expansion of a drinking water infrastructure system with respect to carbon footprint, cost-effectiveness and water demand. Journal of Environmental Management, 110: 194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Pan G X, Smith P et al., 2011. Carbon footprint of China’s crop production: An estimation using agro-statistics data over 1993–2007. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 142: 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuai X W, Lai L, Huang X J et al., 2012. Temporospatial changes of carbon footprint based on energy consumption in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(1): 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan X N, Wang X K, Lu F et al., 2008 Carbon sequestration and its potential by wetland ecosystems in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(2): 463–469. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Guo, X M, Marinova D et al., 2012. Embedded carbon footprint of Chinese urban households: Structure and changes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33: 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J Y, Liu G H, Xu S L, 1996. Carbon cycle and its global meaning of terrestrial ecosystem in China. In: Wang G C, Wen Y P. The Measurement of Greenhouse Gases and Their Release and Related Processes. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 129–139. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Filimonau V, Dickinson J, Robbins D et al., 2011. Reviewing the carbon footprint analysis of hotels: Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA) as a holistic method for carbon impact appraisal of tourist accommodation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19: 1917–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network, 2012. Ecological Footprint Glossary. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/gfn_sub.php?content=glossary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan D S, Chen Y J, Huang F F, 1998. The storage and distribution of carbon in urban vegetation and its roles in balance and oxygen in Guangzhou. China Environmental Science, 18(5): 437–441. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny T, Gray N F, 2009. Comparative performance of six carbon footprint models for use in Ireland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li K R, 2000. Land Use Change, Net Emission of Greenhouse Gases and the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 260. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattara C, Raggi A, Cichelli A, 2012. Life cycle assessment and carbon footprint in the wine supply-chain. Environmental Management, 49: 1247–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz N B, 2010. Delving into the carbon footprints of Singapore: Comparing direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions of a small and open economic system. Energy Policy, 38: 4848–4855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool B K, Brown M A, 2010. Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment. Energy Policy, 38: 4856–4869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach M W, Arnold E, Haase D, 2012. The carbon footprint of urban green space: A life cycle approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104: 220–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodoru C R, Bastien J, Bonneville M C et al., 2012. The net carbon footprint of a newly created boreal hydroelectric reservoir. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 26, doi: 10.1029/2011GB004187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells J R, Boucher J F, Laurent A B et al., 2012. Carbon footprint assessment of a paperback book: Can planned integration of deinked market pulp be detrimental to climate? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16: 212–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T, Minx J, 2007. A Definition of Carbon Footprint. http://www.censa.org.uk/docs/ISA-UK_Report_07-01_carbon_footprint.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund, 2008. Living Planet Report 2008. www.panda.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie H Y, Chen X S, Lin K R, 2008. The ecological footprint analysis of fossil energy and electricity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(4): 1729–1735. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye D Z, Chen P Q, 1992. Study on Prediction of Global Change in China (2nd Part). Beijing: Earthquake Press, 232–245. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R Q, Huang X J, Peng B Z, 2012. Research on carbon cycle and carbon balance of Nanjing urban system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(6): 758–770. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R Q, Huang X J, Zhong T Y et al., 2011. Carbon footprint of different industrial spaces based on energy consumption in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(2): 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianjin Huang.

Additional information

Foundation: National Social Science Foundation of China, No.10ZD&030; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41301633; China Clean Development Mechanism Foundation, No.1214073; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No.2012M511243; No.2013T60518; The Startup Project for High-level Talented Person of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, No.201164

Author: Zhao Rongqin (1978–), PhD and Associate Professor, specialized in land use and carbon cycle.

Corresponding author: Huang Xianjin (1968–), PhD and Professor, specialized in land use and resources & environmental economics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Huang, X., Liu, Y. et al. Urban carbon footprint and carbon cycle pressure: The case study of Nanjing. J. Geogr. Sci. 24, 159–176 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-014-1079-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-014-1079-1

Keywords

Navigation