Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physicochemical behavior of tropical laterite soil stabilized with non-traditional additive

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-traditional soil stabilizers are widely used for treating weak materials. These additives are cost- and time-effective alternatives to more traditional materials such as lime and cement. It has been well established that the treatment of natural soil with chemical additives will gradually affect the size, shape, and arrangement of soil particles. Furthermore, the degree of improvement is dependent on the quantity and the pattern of new products formed on and around the soil particles. In this paper, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test was performed as an index of soil improvement on mix designs treated with calcium-based powder stabilizer (SH-85). The time-dependent changes in shear strength parameter and compressibility behavior of treated soil were also studied using standard direct shear and one-dimensional consolidation tests. In order to better understand the shape and surface area of treated particles, FESEM, N2-BET, and particle size distribution analysis were performed on soil-stabilizer matrix. From engineering standpoint, the UCS results showed that the degree of improvement for SH-85-stabilized laterite soil was roughly five times stronger than the untreated soil at the early stages of curing (7-day period). Also, a significant increase in the compressibility resistance of treated samples with curing time was observed. Based on the results, less porous and denser soil fabric was seen on the surface of clay particles. FESEM images of the treated mix designs showed the formation of white lumps in the soil fabric with the cementitious gel filling the pores in the soil structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad K (2004) Improvement of a tropical residual soil by electrokinetic process. Doctoral dissertation, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering

  2. Ahmad K, Taha MR, Kassim KA (2011) Electrokinetic treatment on a tropical residual soil. Proc ICE-Ground Improv 164(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed FB, Atemimi YK, Ismail MAM (2013) Evaluation the effects of styrene butadiene rubber addition as a new soil stabilizer on geotechnical properties. EJGE 18:735–748

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bobet A, Hwang J, Johnston CT, Santagata M (2011) One-dimensional consolidation behavior of cement-treated organic soil. Can Geotech J 48(7):1100–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. British Standards Institution (1990) British Standard methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes: Part 4, compaction-related tests. London, BS 1377

  6. British Standards Institution (1990) British Standard methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes: Part 2, classification tests. London, BS 1377

  7. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai Y, Shi B, Tang CS (2006) Effect of polypropylene fibre and lime admixture on engineering properties of clayey soil. Eng Geol 87(3):230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ceylan H, Gopalakrishnan K, Kim S (2010) Soil stabilization with bioenergy coproduct. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2186(1):130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chew SH, Kamruzzaman AHM, Lee FH (2004) Physicochemical and engineering behavior of cement treated clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(7):696–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Brito Galvão TC, Elsharief A, Simões GF (2004) Effects of lime on permeability and compressibility of two tropical residual soils. J Environ Eng 130(8):881–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eberemu AO (2011) Consolidation properties of compacted lateritic soil treated with rice husk ash. Geomat (GM) 1(3):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisazadeh A (2010) Physicochemical behavior of lime and phosphoric acid stabilized clayey soil. Doctoral dissertation, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering

  14. Eisazadeh A, Kassim KA, Nur H (2011) Characterization of phosphoric acid-and lime-stabilized tropical lateritic clay. Environ Earth Sci 63(5):1057–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisazadeh A, Kassim KA, Nur H (2013) Morphology and BET surface area of phosphoric acid stabilized tropical soils. Eng Geol 154:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho MH, Chan CM (2011) Some mechanical properties of cement stabilized Malaysian soft clay. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 74:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  17. JCPDS (1995) Index to the powder diffraction file. International Center for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, PA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jie YX, Li GX, Tang F, Jin Y, Hua JX (2012) Soil stabilization in the fill project of the olympic rowing-canoeing park in Beijing. J Mater Civ Eng 25(4):462–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz LE, Rauch AF, Liljestrand HM, Harmon JS, Shaw KS, Albers H (2011) Mechanisms of soil stabilization with liquid ionic stabilizer. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1757(1):50–57

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu J, Shi B, Jiang H, Huang H, Wang G, Kamai T (2011) Research on the stabilization treatment of clay slope topsoil by organic polymer soil stabilizer. Eng Geol 117(1):114–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lorenzo GA, Bergado DT (2004) Fundamental parameters of cement-admixed clay-new approach. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(10):1042–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marto A, Latifi N, Sohaei H (2013) Stabilization of laterite soil using GKS soil stabilizer. Electr J Geotech Eng (EJGE) 18:521–532

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morin WJ, Todor PC (1979) Laterite and lateritic soils and other problem soils of the tropics. IPR, 1979. cap. 7 e 8

  25. Nalbantoglu Z, Tuncer ER (2001) Compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of a chemically treated expansive clay. Can Geotech J 38(1):154–160

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rajasekaran G, Narasimha Rao S (2002) Compressibility behaviour of lime-treated marine clay. Ocean Eng 29(5):545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rajasekaran G, NarasimhaRao S (1997) Lime stabilization technique for the improvement of marine clay. Soils Found 37(2):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rao SM, Shivananda P (2005) Compressibility behaviour of lime-stabilized clay. Geotech Geol Eng 23(3):309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rauch AF, Harmon JS, Kat LE, Liljestrand HM (2002) Measured effects of liquid soil stabilizers on engineering properties of clay. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1787(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rauch AF, Katz LE, Liljestrand HM (2003) An analysis of the mechanisms and efficacy of three liquid chemical soil stabilizers. Volume 1. Texas Department of Transportation

  31. Tingle JS, Santoni RL (2003) Stabilization of clay soils with nontraditional additives. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1819(1):72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tingle JS, Newman JK, Larson S, Weiss CA, Rushing JF (2007) Stabilization mechanisms of nontraditional additives. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1989(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Townsend FC (1985) Geotechnical characteristics of residual soils. J Geotech Eng 111(1):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zelalem A (2005) Basic engineering properties of lateritic soils found in Nejo–Mendi road construction area, Welega

  35. Zhang T, Xu YY, Wang H (2012) Application and curing mechanism of soil stabilizer. Adv Mater Res 557:809–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wish to acknowledge the financial supports given by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), and the supports from the Construction Research Alliance and Construction Research Centre UTM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnic and Transportation Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Skudai, 81310, Johor, Malaysia

    Nima Latifi, Aminaton Marto & Amin Eisazadeh

Authors
  1. Nima Latifi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aminaton Marto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amin Eisazadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Latifi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latifi, N., Marto, A. & Eisazadeh, A. Physicochemical behavior of tropical laterite soil stabilized with non-traditional additive. Acta Geotech. 11, 433–443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0370-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0370-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation