Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Label propagation dictionary learning based process monitoring method for industrial process with between-mode similarity

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of the industrial cyber-physical systems, a small amount of labeled data and a large amount of unlabeled data are collected from the industrial process. Due to the variation of internal operation conditions and external environment, there is a between-mode similarity between data samples. The scarcity of labeled data and the existence of similarity make it challenging to extract data characteristics. In addition, it creates new challenges to process monitoring. To solve these problems, this study proposes a label propagation dictionary learning method. We first establish the connection between atoms and corresponding profiles and realize the propagation of their labels through graph Laplacian regularization. Then, considering the similarity of samples in the same class, the low-rank constraint is added to sparse coding to strengthen the mutual propagation of labels. Finally, an optimization method is designed to obtain the dictionary and classifier simultaneously. When new data samples arrive, we conduct process monitoring and condition prediction based on the learned dictionary and classifier. Experiments show that the proposed method can achieve satisfactory monitoring performance when compared to several state-of-the-art methods, indicating the superiority of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jia Q-S, Wu J J. On distributed event-based optimization for shared economy in cyber-physical energy systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 110203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guan X H, Xu Z B, Jia Q-S, et al. Cyber-physical model for efficient and secured operation of CPES or energy Internet. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 110201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang K, Wu S, Li F, et al. Fault diagnosis of hydraulic systems based on deep learning model with multirate data samples. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3083401

  4. Yin S, Li X, Gao H, et al. Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: an overview. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, 62: 657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu W K, Zhao C H. Low-rank characteristic and temporal correlation analytics for incipient industrial fault detection with missing data. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2021, 17: 6337–6346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar A, Bhattacharya A, Flores-Cerrillo J. Data-driven process monitoring and fault analysis of reformer units in hydrogen plants: industrial application and perspectives. Comput Chem Eng, 2020, 136: 106756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheng N, Liu Q, Qin S J, et al. Comprehensive monitoring of nonlinear processes based on concurrent kernel projection to latent structures. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng, 2016, 13: 1129–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao C H, Gao F R. Fault-relevant principal component analysis (FPCA) method for multivariate statistical modeling and process monitoring. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst, 2014, 133: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harkat M F, Kouadri A, Fezai R, et al. Machine learning-based reduced kernel PCA model for nonlinear chemical process monitoring. J Control Autom Electr Syst, 2020, 31: 1196–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee S H, Mazumder J, Park J, et al. Ranked feature-based laser material processing monitoring and defect diagnosis using k-NN and SVM. J Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 55: 307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tian Y L, Jia M, Wang Z, et al. Monitoring invasion process of spartina alterniflora by seasonal sentinel-2 imagery and an object-based random forest classification. Remote Sens, 2020, 12: 1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wuest T, Irgens C, Thoben K D. An approach to monitoring quality in manufacturing using supervised machine learning on product state data. J Intell Manuf, 2014, 25: 1167–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lei Y G, Jia F, Lin J, et al. An intelligent fault diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning towards mechanical big data. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2016, 63: 3137–3147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng S D, Zhao J S. A new unsupervised data mining method based on the stacked autoencoder for chemical process fault diagnosis. Comput Chem Eng, 2020, 135: 106755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monroy I, Benitez R, Escudero G, et al. A semi-supervised approach to fault diagnosis for chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng, 2010, 34: 631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu K, Lin T R, Ma H, et al. A multi-stage semi-supervised learning approach for intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing using data augmentation and metric learning. Mech Syst Signal Processing, 2021, 146: 107043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu G C, Lin Z C, Yu Y, et al. Robust subspace segmentation by low-rank representation. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2010. 8

  18. Li S, Fu Y. Low-rank coding with b-matching constraint for semi-supervised classification. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013. 1472–1478

  19. Liu H, Jia Y, Hou J, et al. Learning low-rank graph with enhanced supervision. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2021.3089336

  20. Gu S, Zhang L, Zuo W, et al. Projective dictionary pair learning for pattern classification. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2014. 793–801

  21. Ma L, Wang C, Xiao B, et al. Sparse representation for face recognition based on discriminative low-rank dictionary learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012. 2586–2593

  22. Jiang Z L, Lin Z, Davis L S. Learning a discriminative dictionary for sparse coding via label consistent K-SVD. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2011. 1697–1704

  23. Yang M, Zhang L, Yang J, et al. Metaface learning for sparse representation based face recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2010. 1601–1604

  24. Mairal J, Bach F, Ponce J, et al. Supervised dictionary learning. 2008. ArXiv:0809.3083

  25. Zhang Q, Li B. Discriminative K-SVD for dictionary learning in face recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010. 2691–2698

  26. Pilastre B, Boussouf L, D’Escrivan S, et al. Anomaly detection in mixed telemetry data using a sparse representation and dictionary learning. Signal Processing, 2020, 168: 107320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang K, Wen H, Ji H, et al. Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel dictionary learning with application to aluminum electrolysis process. Control Eng Practice, 2019, 89: 94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aharon M, Elad M, Bruckstein A. K-SVD: an algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2006, 54: 4311–4322

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sahoo S K, Makur A. Signal recovery from random measurements via extended orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2015, 63: 2572–2581

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang X Q, Liu Q, Wang D, et al. Self-taught semisupervised dictionary learning with nonnegative constraint. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2020, 16: 532–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadeghi M, Babaie-Zadeh M, Jutten C. Learning overcomplete dictionaries based on atom-by-atom updating. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2014, 62: 883–891

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin Z C, Chen M M, Ma Y. The augmented lagrange multiplier method for exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices. 2010. ArXiv:1009.5055

  33. Lin T Y, Ma S Q, Zhang S Z. Iteration complexity analysis of multi-block ADMM for a family of convex minimization without strong convexity. J Sci Comput, 2016, 69: 52–81

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen L, Li X, Sun D, et al. On the equivalence of inexact proximal ALM and ADMM for a class of convex composite programming. Math Program, 2021, 185: 111–161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Yin S, Ding S X, Haghani A, et al. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. J Process Control, 2012, 22: 1567–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu X Z, Xie L, Wang S Q. Multi-mode process monitoring method based on PCA mixture model. CIESC J, 2011, 62: 743–752

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang C, Zhou L, Huang K, et al. Multimode process monitoring based on robust dictionary learning with application to aluminium electrolysis process. Neurocomputing, 2019, 332: 305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoo K A, Kantor J C. An exothermic continuous stirred tank reactor is feedback equivalent to a linear system. Chem Eng Commun, 1985, 37: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu J, Qin S J. Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference-based finite Gaussian mixture models. AIChE J, 2008, 54: 1811–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62073340, 61860206014), National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFB1705300), Innovation-Driven Plan in Central South University, China (Grant No. 2019CX020), and the 111 Project, China (Grant No. B17048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China

    Keke Huang, Shijun Tao, Yishun Liu, Chunhua Yang & Weihua Gui

Authors
  1. Keke Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shijun Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yishun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunhua Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weihua Gui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yishun Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, K., Tao, S., Liu, Y. et al. Label propagation dictionary learning based process monitoring method for industrial process with between-mode similarity. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65, 110203 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3341-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3341-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation