Abstract
The bubble formation process at submerged orifices with different geometry is investigated in the preparation of aluminum foams by gas injection method. The bubble profile on a horizontal plate is calculated by quasi-static analysis through Laplace equation. The bubble formation process is then distinguished into three stages: nucleation stage, growth stage and detachment stage in wetting and less wetting conditions based on the force balance analysis. In addition, the bubble size at high Reynolds number is obtained by considering the contribution of buoyancy, pressure force, inertial force, drag force and surface tension based on the three stages of bubble formation. The bubble size is confirmed to be sensitive to the equivalent contact angle, which consists of two terms including the contact angle and the wedge angle. Therefore, the wedge angle is introduced in the design of gas outlet orifices for the purpose of decreasing bubble size generated. The experimental study is conducted at three different types of stainless steel orifices under constant gas flow rates (0.05–2 L/min). It is clarified that the orifice geometry and the orifice size are both responsible for the cell size of aluminum foams. The experimental results for three different types of orifices show a consistent trend with the theoretical predictions at various gas flow rates. In the design of orifices to generate small bubbles in the melt, the wedge angle that coordinates with the contact angle is thus suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jeon Y P, Kang C G, Lee S M. Effects of cell size on compression and bending strength of aluminum-foamed material by complex stirring in induction heating. J Mater Process Tech, 2009, 20: 435–444
Xu Z G, Fu J W, Luo T J, et al. Effects of cell size on quasi-static compressive properties of Mg alloy foams. Mater Design, 2012, 34: 40–44
Kulkarni A A, Joshi J B. Bubble formation and bubble rise velocity in gas-liquid systems: A review. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2005, 44: 5873–5931
Dietrich N, Mayoufi N, Poncin S, et al. Bubble formation at an orifice: A multiscale investigation. Chem Eng Sci, 2013, 92: 118–125
Kogawa H, Shobu T, Futakawa M, et al. Effect of wettability on bubble formation at gas nozzle under stagnant condition. J Nucl Mater, 2008, 377: 189–194
Dobesberger F, Flankl H, Leitlmeier D, et al. Device and process for producing metal foam. US patent, 7195662 B2, 2007-03-27
Vafaei S, Angeli P, Wen D. Bubble growth rate from stainless steel substrate and needle nozzles. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp, 2011, 384: 240–247
Higuera F J, Medina A. Injection and coalescence of bubbles in a quiescent inviscid liquid. Eur J Mech B-Fluid, 2006, 25: 164–171
Bolaños-Jiménez R, Sevilla A, Martínez-Bazán C, et al. Axisymmetric bubble collapse in a quiescent liquid pool. II. Experimental study. Phys Fluids, 2008, 20: 112104
Ramakrishnan S, Kumar R, Kuloor N R. Studies in bubble formation-I bubble formation under constant flow conditions. Chem Eng Sci, 1969, 24: 731–747
Satyanarayan A, Kumar R, Kuloor N R. Studies in bubble formation-II bubble formation under constant pressure conditions. Chem Eng Sci, 1969, 24: 749–761
Khurana A K, Kumar R. Studies in bubble formation-III. Chem Eng Sci, 1969, 24: 1711–1723
Lin J N, Banerji S K, Yasuda H. Role of interfacial tension in the formation and the detachment of air bubbles. 1. A single hole on a horizontal plane immersed in water. Langmuir, 1994, 10: 936–942
Byakova A V, Gnyloskurenko S V, Nakamura T, et al. Influence of wetting conditions on bubble formation at orifice in an inviscid liquid: Mechanism of bubble evolution. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp, 2003, 229: 19–32
Sano M, Mori K. Bubble formation from single nozzles in liquid metals. Trans JIM, 1976, 17: 344–352
Oguz H N, Prosperetti A. Dynamics of bubble growth and detachment from a needle. J Fluid Mech, 1993, 257: 111–145
Gnyloskurenko S V, Nakamura T. Wettability effect on bubble formation at nozzles in liquid aluminum. Mater Trans, 2003, 44: 2298–2302
Gnyloskurenko S V, Byakova A, Nakamura T, et al. Influence of wettability on bubble formation in liquid. J Mater Sci, 2005, 40: 2437–2441
Vafaei S, Wen D. Bubble formation on a submerged micronozzle. J Colloid Interf Sci, 2010, 343: 291–297
Gerlach D, Biswas G, Durst F, et al. Quasi-static bubble formation on submerged orifices. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 2005, 48: 425–438
Chen Y, Mertz R, Kulenovic R. Numerical simulation of bubble formation on orifice plates with a moving contact line. Int J Multiphas Flow, 2009, 35: 66–77
Chen Y, Liu S, Kulenovic R, et al. Experimental study on macroscopic contact line behaviors during bubble formation on submerged orifice and comparison with numerical simulations. Phys Fluids, 2013, 25: 092105
Vafaei S, Wen D. Spreading of triple line and dynamics of bubble growth inside nanoparticle dispersions on top of a substrate plate. J Colloid Interf Sci, 2011, 362: 285–291
Dyson D C. Contact line stability at edges: Comments on Gibbs’s inequalities. Phys Fluids, 1988, 31: 229–232
Oliver J F, Huh C, Mason S G. Resistance to spreading of liquids by sharp edges. J Colloid Interf Sci, 1977, 59: 568–581
Yuan J Y, Li Y X, Zhou Y T. Effect of contact angle on bubble formation at submerged orifices. J Mater Sci, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8516-5
Fan X L, Chen X, Liu X N, et al. Bubble formation at a submerged orifice for aluminum foams produced by gas injection method. Metall Mater Trans A, 2013, 44: 729–737
Gallois B M. Wetting in nonreactive liquid metal-oxide systems. Jom, 1997, 49: 48–51
Laurent V, Chatain D, Eustathopoulos N. Wettability of SiO2 and oxidized SiC by aluminium. Mater Sci Eng A, 1991, 135: 89–94
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, J., Li, Y. Effect of orifice geometry on bubble formation in melt gas injection to prepare aluminum foams. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 58, 64–74 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5669-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5669-z