Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of student activity in web-supported courses as a tool for predicting dropout

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Persistence in learning processes is perceived as a central value; therefore, dropouts from studies are a prime concern for educators. This study focuses on the quantitative analysis of data accumulated on 362 students in three academic course website log files in the disciplines of mathematics and statistics, in order to examine whether student activity on course websites may assist in providing early identification of learner dropout from specific courses or from degree track studies in general. It was found in this study that identifying the changes in student activity during the course period could help in detecting at-risk learners in real time, before they actually drop out from the course. Data examination on a monthly basis throughout the semester can enable educators and institutions to flag students that have been identified as having unusual behavior, deviating from the course average. It was found that a large percentage of students (66%) who had been marked as at-risk actually did not finish their courses and/or degree. The presented analysis allows instructors to observe website student usage data during a course, and to locate students who are not using the system as expected. Furthermore, it could enable university decision makers to see the information on a campus level for initiating intervention programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aburdene, M. F., & Kozick, R. J. (1997). A project-oriented course in probability and statistics for undergraduate electrical engineering students. In Proceedings of the frontiers in education conference, 27th annual conference. Teaching and learning in an era of change (Vol. 2, pp. 598–603) doi:10.1109/FIE.1997.635870.

  • Ai, J., & Laffey, J. (2007). Web mining as a tool for understanding online learning. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alier, M., Casany, P., & Casado, P. (2007). A mobile extension of a web based moodle virtual classroom. In Proceedings of the E-challenges comference (pp. 11–26).

  • Astin, A. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot, B. (2004). Higher education’s revolving door: Confronting the problem of student drop out in US colleges and universities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(1), 9–18. doi:10.1080/0268051042000177818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. (1985). Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college student dropout syndrome. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 35–64. doi:10.3102/00028312022001035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tsur, D. (2007). Affairs of state and student retention: An exploratory study of the factors that impact student retention in a politically turbulent region. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(3), 317–332. doi:10.1080/01425690701252382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. W., Dawson, K., & Priem, J. (2008). Data for free: Using LMS activity logs to measure community in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 65–70. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, R., DeBuhr, L., & Martin, D. (1983). Breaking the attrition cycle: The effects of supplemental instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition. The Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 80–90. doi:10.2307/1981646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandl, K. (2005). Are you ready to “MOODLE”? Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breier, M. (2010). From ‘financial considerations’ to ‘poverty’: Towards a reconceptualization of the role of finances in higher education student drop out. Higher Education, 60(6), 657–670. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9343-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A., Nora, A., & Casaneda, M. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 33(5), 571–594. doi:10.1007/BF00973759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, J. T. (2007). Assessing online homework in first-semester calculus. PRIMUS, 26(6), 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2007). Utilizing student data within the course management system to determine undergraduate student academic success: An exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/32/87/3287222.html.

  • Campbell, J. P., DeBlois, P. B., & Oblinger, D. G. (2007). Academic analytics: A new tool for a new era. EDUCAUSE Review, 42(4), 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96, 42–54. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. (2012). Institutional characteristics and college student dropout risks: A multilevel event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 487–505. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9241-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J., Kulkarni, C., & Klemmer, S. (2013). Tools for predicting drop-off in large online classes. In Proceedings of the computer supported cooperative work companion (pp. 121–124). doi:10.1145/2441955.2441987.

  • Cohen, A., & Nachmias, R. (2011). What can instructors and policy makers learn about web-supported learning through web-mining. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., & Nachmias, R. (2012). The implementation of a cost effectiveness analyzer for web-supported academic instruction: An example from life science. International Journal on E-Learning, 11(2), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., & Shimony, U. (2016). Dropout prediction in a massive open online course using learning analytics. In Proceedings of E-Learn 2016 world conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education, organized by the AACE-Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education and the International Journal on E-Learning, Washington, USA.

  • Cohen, A., & Soffer, T. (2015). Academic instruction in a digital world: The virtual TAU case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S., McWilliam, E., & Tan, J. P.-L. (2008). Teaching Smarter: How mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice. In Proceedings of the Australasian Society for computers in learning in tertiary education (pp. 221–230).

  • Dietz-Uhler, B., & Hurn, J. E. (2013). Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: A faculty perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. (2006). An analysis of multiple factors affecting retention in Web-based community college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 245–255. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, R., Ramos-Pires, A., & Gonçalves, H. (2014). Identifying at-risk students in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(7–8), 944–952. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.906110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners dropout. Workforce, 80(10), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, R. (2014). Sustaining college students’ persistence and achievement through exemplary instructional strategies. Research in Higher Education, 24, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, S., & List, B. (2005). An evaluation of open source e-learning platforms stressing adaptation issues. In Proceedings of the fifth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, IEEE, Computer Society (pp. 1–3). doi:10.1109/ICALT.2005.54.

  • Grau-Valldosera, J., & Minguillón, J. (2014). Rethinking dropout in online higher education: The case of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 290–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstschräer, J., & Sprietsma, M. (2015). The effects of the introduction of Bachelor degrees on college enrollment and dropout rates. Education Economics, 23(3), 296–317. doi:10.1080/09645292.2013.823908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovdhaugen, E. (2011). Do structured study programmes lead to lower rates of dropout and student transfer from university? Irish Educational Studies, 30(2), 237–251. doi:10.1080/03323315.2011.569143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang Wu-Yuin & Wang Chin-Yu. (2004). A study of learning time patterns in asynchronous learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 292–304. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00088.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 Higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazin, R., & Neumann, L. (1991). Student characteristics as predictors of drop-out from medical school: Admissions to Beer-Sheva over a decade. Medical Education, 25(5), 396–404. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00087.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Gamlieli, H., Cohen, A., & Nachmias, R. (2015). Detection of overly intensive learning by using weblog of course website. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning (TICL), 10(2), 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., Barak, A., & Yaar, E. (1979). College dropout and some of its correlates. Megamot, 24(4), 564–573 [Hebrew].

  • Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48, 185–204. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. (2012). The age of big data. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-impact-in-the-world.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.

  • Lu, J., Yu, C. S., & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information & Management, 40(6), 497–507. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00064-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykourentzou, I., Giannoukos, I., Nikolopoulos, V., Mpardis, G., & Loumos, V. (2009). Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Computers & Education, 53, 950–965. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac an Bhaird, C., Morgan, T., & O’Shea, A. (2009). The impact of the mathematics support centre on the grades of first year students at the National University of Ireland Maynooth. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 28, 117–122. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrp014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54, 588–599. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez-Vera, C., Cano, A., Romero, C., Noaman, A. Y. M., Mousa Fardoun, H., & Ventura, S. (2015). Early dropout prediction using data mining: A case study with high school students. Expert Systems. doi:10.1111/exsy.12135.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who Succeeds at University? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 21–33. doi:10.1080/07924360120043621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, G., Ochoa, X., & Chiluiza, K. (2014). Techniques for data-driven curriculum analysis. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 148–157). doi:10.1145/2567574.2567591.

  • Ngom, B., Guillermet, H., & Niang, I. (2012). Enhancing Moodle for offline learning in a degraded connectivity environment. In Proceedings of the international conference on multimedia computing and systems (pp. 858–863). doi:10.1109/ICMCS.2012.6320168.

  • Nistor, N., & Neubauer, K. (2010). From participation to dropout: Quantitative participation patterns in online university courses. Computers & Education, 55, 663–672. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, E. A., & Dehon, C. (2013). Roads to success in the Belgian French Community’s higher education system: Predictors of dropout and degree completion at the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 693–723. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9290-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. (2003). Identifying predictors of academic persistence in distance education. USDLA Journal, 17(1), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. H. (2006). Moodle e-learning course development (3rd ed.). Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., López, M. I., Luna, J. M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Computers & Education, 68, 458–472. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.009..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2006). Data mining in E-learning. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., Ventura, S., & García, E. (2008). Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers & Education, 51(1), 368–384. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, M. A., Costa, E. B., Neto, B. F. D. S., Silva, I. C. L., & Rego, J. B. (2015). A predictive model for identifying students with dropout profiles in online courses. In Proceeding of the 8th international conference on educational data mining, EDM workshops.

  • Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Stoyanov, S., & Specht, M. (2014). Quality Indicators for Learning Analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiliopoulou, M., & Pohle, C. (2001). Data mining for measuring and improving the success of web sites. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 5, 85–114. doi:10.1023/A:1009800113571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B., Briton, D., Gismondi, M., Heller, B., Kennepohl, D., McGreal, R., et al. (2007). Choosing moodle: An evaluation of learning management systems at Athabasca University. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 5(3), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31(1), 97–116. doi:10.1007/BF00129109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. doi:10.3102/00346543045001089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Doll, W. J., Deng, X., Park, K., & Yang, M. G. M. (2013). The impact of faculty perceived reconfigurability of learning management systems on effective teaching practices. Computers & Education, 61, 146–157. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151–163. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00042-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, M. (2004). Prediction and assessment of student behavior in open and distance education in computers using Bayesian networks. Computers & Education, 43(4), 345–359. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yingling, M. (2006). Mobile moodle. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(6), 280–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anat Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, A. Analysis of student activity in web-supported courses as a tool for predicting dropout. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 1285–1304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9524-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9524-3

Keywords

Navigation