Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of a virtual tutee system on academic reading engagement in a college classroom

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poor student engagement with academic readings has been frequently reported in college classrooms. As an effort to improve college students’ reading engagement, researchers have developed a virtual environment in which students take on the role of tutor and teach a virtual tutee, the virtual tutee system (VTS). This research examined the effectiveness of the VTS for enhancing students’ academic reading motivation, engagement, and performance. Two groups of college students were compared: students who used the VTS and those who used an online reading guide (RG). Both quantitative and qualitative data were used to acquire a better understanding of reading motivation and engagement. The study found that students in the VTS group engaged in a deep level of cognitive processing when they completed the reading assignments. They also exhibited a higher reading performance than students in the RG group. These findings imply that teaching and interacting with a virtual tutee promotes students’ deep engagement in reading activities. The paper discusses study limitations and suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, V. L., & Feldman, R. S. (1973). Learning through tutoring: Low-achieving children as tutors. Journal of Experimental Education, 42, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, V. L., & Feldman, R. S. (1976). Studies on the role of tutor. In V. L. Allen (Ed.), Children as teachers: Theory and research on tutoring (pp. 113–129). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arco-Tirado, J. L., Fernández-Martín, F. D., & Fernández-Balboa, J.-M. (2011). The impact of a peer-tutoring program on quality standards in higher education. Higher Education, 62(6), 773–788. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9419-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arquette, C. M. (2010). Education majors’ textbook reading habits: How much are they reading? National Social Science Journal, 35, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brost, B. D., & Bradley, K. (2006). Student compliance with assigned reading: A case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 163–177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring? Metacognition and Learning, 1(3), 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-9002-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, L. S., & Kennedy, C. H. (1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(1), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. R., & Park, J. (2005). Developing reading comprehension questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and“why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, R. Z. (2005). Students’ approaches to study in introductory accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 194–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Davis, G. Y., & Ginsburg, M. D. (1995). Effects of parent involvement in isolation or in combination with peer tutoring on student self-concept and mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (2001). Cross age tutoring: Alternatives to the reading resource room for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(4), 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, L., & McConnell, C. (2009). Student reading strategies and textbook use: An inquiry into economics and accounting courses. Research in Higher Education Journal, 3, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J., & Winterbottom, M. (2011). Peer-tutoring: What’s in it for the tutor? Educational Studies, 37(3), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, A., Kohler, M. C., & Riessman, F. (1971). Children teach children: Learning by teaching. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Questions asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2005). Social psychology. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, M., Watson, P., & Elliot, S. (2007). “School” reading and multiple texts: Examining the metacognitive development of secondary-level preservice teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 150–162. doi:10.1598/JAAL.51.2.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic life span. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(5), 794–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Topping, K., & Thurston, A. (2010). Peer tutoring in reading: The effects of role and organization on two dimensions of self-esteem. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. W., & Kim, C. (2012). A design framework for a virtual tutee system to promote academic reading engagement in a college classroom. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 2(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. W., & Kim, C. (2014). Virtual tutee system: A potential tool for enhancing academic reading engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Academic emotions questionnaire-mathematics (AEQ-M): User’s manual. Germany: University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. J., & Phillips, F. (2007). Sink or skim: Textbook reading behaviors of introductory accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731–810). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Boston, MA: Springer US. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1

  • Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1300–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. R., Schofield, J. W., & Steers-Wentzell, K. L. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 327–362. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-8137-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, R. D. (2008). Opportunities and barriers for tutor learning: Knowledge-building, metacognition, and motivation. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science, 36(4), 321–350. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R., & Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 488–567). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C., Chin, D., Oppezzo, M., Kwong, H., Okita, S., & Wagster, J. D. (2009). Interactive metacognition: Monitoring and regulating a teachable agent. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 340–358). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. S., Hernandez, E. J., & Adams, B. S. (2004). “Learning by teaching”: A peer-teaching model for diversity training in medical school. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16(1), 60–63. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1601_12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. (2000). College students’ academic performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21(4), 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In B. Moschner & C. Artelt (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Berlin, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. (1987). Essay versus multiple-choice type classroom exams: The student’s perspective. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(6), 352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Education, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center B3, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea

    Seung Won Park

  2. Learning, Design, and Technology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    ChanMin Kim

Authors
  1. Seung Won Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ChanMin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Won Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, S.W., Kim, C. The effects of a virtual tutee system on academic reading engagement in a college classroom. Education Tech Research Dev 64, 195–218 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9416-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9416-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation