Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An examination of the effect of customized reading modules on diverse secondary students’ reading comprehension and motivation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research sought to add to a body of knowledge that is severely underrepresented in the scientific literature, the effects of technological tools on reading comprehension and reading motivation in diverse secondary students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. The study implemented an independent silent reading (ISR) program across a 5-month semester in an urban public high school and included 145 participants from nine 10th grade literature classes. The control group took part in no ISR, one treatment group participated in weekly ISR read from a textbook, and another treatment group participated in weekly ISR read from a computer module designed to address essential components of reading. Students were measured on global reading comprehension, text-specific reading assessments, and reading motivation. After controlling for initial skill and disposition levels, the results indicated that students from both ISR groups made greater gains than the control group in global reading comprehension, while the computer reading module group outperformed the textbook group and the control on text-specific assignments and increased their reading motivation to a greater degree than those in the other conditions. This research offers much-needed data on secondary students’ reading achievement and disposition and provides evidence that ISR implemented through the use of instructional technology and cognitive tools has broad potential to address development in these areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allbritton, D. (2004). Strategic production of predictive inferences during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 38(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. T., & Boykin, A. W. (2001). The role of task variability and home contextual factors in the academic performance and task motivation of African American elementary school children. Journal of Negro Education, 70(1), 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. (2000). Reading reminders. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Petrella, J. N. (2004). Effective reading comprehension instruction: Examining child × instruction interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 682–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas, J. A. (2010). Applied cognition in reading: An analysis of reading comprehension in secondary students. Educational Psychology and Special Education Dissertations. Paper 70. Retrieved February 27, 2012 from http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/epse_diss/70.

  • Dewitz, P., & Dewitz, P. K. (2003). They can read the words, but they can’t understand: Refining comprehension assessment. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 422–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnel, D., & Glover, J. A. (1985). Advance organizers: Encoding manipulations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 514–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garan, E. M., & DeVoogd, G. (2008). The benefits of sustained silent reading: Scientific research and common sense converge. The Reading Teacher, 62(4), 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselbring, T. S., & Goin, L. I. (2004). Literacy instruction for older struggling readers: What is the role of technology? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20(2), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hock, M., & Mellard, D. (2005). Reading comprehension strategies for adult literacy outcomes. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(3ov), 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, W. G., Ellis, H. H., & Rasmussen, K. (2004). From the arcade to the classroom: Capitalizing on students’ sensory rich media preferences in disciplined-based learning. College Student Journal, 38(3), 431–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). Just plain reading: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 350–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M., & Clausen-Grace, N. (2006). R5: The sustained silent reading makeover that transformed readers. The Reading Teacher, 60(2), 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klin, C. M., Murray, J. D., Levine, W. H., & Guzman, A. E. (1999). Forward inferences: From activation to long-term memory. Discourse Processes, 27(3), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozminsky, E., & Kozminsky, L. (2001). How do general knowledge and reading strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different educational levels? Journal of Research in Reading, 24(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (2000). Forward. In J. L. Pilgreen (Ed.), The SSR handbook: How to organize and manage a sustained silent reading program (pp.vii–xi). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  • Lea, R. B., Mulligan, E. J., & Walton, J. L. (2005). Accessing distant premise information: How memory feeds reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, P. E., Krezmien, M., Mason, L., & Meisel, S. M. (2005). Organizing and delivering empirically based literacy instruction to incarcerated youth. Exceptionality, 13(2), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Bera, S. (2005). An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliano, J. P., Todaro, S., Millis, K., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Kim, H. J., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: A comparison of live and computerized training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S., Caffarella, R., & Baumgartner, L. (2007). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B. (2005). Making a case and a place for effective content area literacy instruction in the elementary grades. The Reading Teacher, 59(1), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucherah, W., & Yoder, A. (2008). Motivation for reading and middle school students’ performance on standardized testing in reading. Reading Psychology, 29(3), 214–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Nelson, J. R., & Stage, S. A. (2007). Fostering the development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension though contextually-based multiple meaning vocabulary instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D., & Gallagher, M. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgreen, J. L. (2000). The SSR handbook: How to organize and manage a sustained silent reading program. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2005). Engage me or enrage me: What today’s learners demand. Educause Review, 40(5), 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmeron, L. C. J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes A Multidisciplinary Journal, 40(3), 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 620–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2007). Dimensions of reading motivation: Development of an adult reading motivation scale. Reading Psychology, 28(5), 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapp, J. C., & Glover, J. A. (1990). Advance organizers and study questions. Journal of Educational Research, 83(5), 266–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, M. (2002). Psychology and adult learning. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Governor’s Office of Student Achievement. (2010). Retrieved June 28, 2010 from http://gaosa.org/index.aspx.

  • Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. N. (1997). Practice effects of advance organization with older adult subjects. Educational Gerontology, 23(3), 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. N. (1998). Using advance organizers to facilitate reading comprehension among older adults. Educational Gerontology, 24(7), 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, D., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudel, H. (2007). Making data-driven decisions: Silent reading. The Reading Teacher, 61(4), 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, S. W., Delaney, H., & Kinnucan, M. (1983). Specifying the nature of reading ability differences and advance organizer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North Georgia College and State University, Dahlonega, GA, USA

    Joshua A. Cuevas

  2. Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Miles A. Irving

  3. University of Phoenix, Phoenix, USA

    Roxanne L. Russell

Authors
  1. Joshua A. Cuevas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roxanne L. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miles A. Irving
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua A. Cuevas.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 9 Reading passages
Full size table

Appendix 2

figure afigure afigure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuevas, J.A., Russell, R.L. & Irving, M.A. An examination of the effect of customized reading modules on diverse secondary students’ reading comprehension and motivation. Education Tech Research Dev 60, 445–467 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9244-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9244-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation