Adelskold, G., Alklett, K., Axelsson, R., & Blomgren, G. (1999). Problem-based distance learning of energy issues via computer network. Distance Education
Anderson, S. E., & Harris, J. B. (1997). Factors associated with amount of use and benefits obtained by users of a statewide educational telecomputing network. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Berge, Z. L. (1999). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39(1), 5–11.
Brewer, S. A. (2004). Small group learning in an online asynchronous environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
Brewer, S., & Klein, J. D. (2006). Type of positive interdependence and affiliation motive in an asynchronous collaborative learning environment. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 54
Bruffee, K. (1995). Sharing our toys. Change, 27(1), 12–18.
Cavalier, J. C., & Klein, J. D. (1998). Effects of cooperative versus individual learning and orienting activities during computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 33(3), 52–72.
Cavalier, J. C., Klein, J. D., & Cavalier, F. J. (1995). Effects of cooperative learning on performance, attitude, and group behaviors in a technical team environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43
Chen, H. (2005). The effect of type of threading and level of self-efficacy on achievement and attitudes in online course discussion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
Chou, C. C. (2001). Student interaction in a collaborative distance-learning environment: A model of learner-centered computer-mediated interaction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 3005200.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–13.
Collins, C., & Collins, S. (1996). The internet as a tool. Retrieved May 22, 2005, from ERIC database (ED 398 883).
Dalton, D. W., Hannafin, M. J., & Hooper, S. (1989). The effects of individual versus cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36
Eastmond, D. (1995). Alone but together: Adult distance study through computer conferencing. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Elvers, G. C., Polzella, D. J., & Graetz, K. (2003). Procrastination in online courses: Performance and attitudinal differences. Teaching of Psychology, 20
Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., & Aely, M. (2001). Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.
Retrieved June 21, 2005, from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v2.1/fahy.html
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48
Golas, K. (2002). Guidelines for designing online learning. Retrieved June 6, 2005, from Southwest Research Institute Web Site: http://www.tss.swri.org/tsd/publications/20021TSEC_ONLINELEARNING.html.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance education. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 355–395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hara, N. (2002). Analysis of computer-mediated communication: Using formal concept analysis as a visualizing methodology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26
Hativa, N. (1988). Computer-based drill and practice in arithmetic: Widening the gap between high and low achieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 366–397.
Hooper, S. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40
Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1988). Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous vs. homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4
Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39
Hoskins, S. L., & van Hoof, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36
Johnston, V. L. (1996). Toward a global classroom using computer-mediated communications at UAA. University of Alaska Anchorage, Vocational Teacher Report, ERIC Document database (ED356759).
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–25.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperative learning and traditional American values: An appreciation. NASSP Bulletin, 80
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1996). Advanced cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated and face-to-face group problem-solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49
Jonassen, D., Prevish, T., Christy, D., & Stavulaki, E. (1999). Learning to solve problems on the Web: Aggregate planning in a business management course. Distance Education, 20
Joung, S. (2003). The effects of high-structure cooperative versus low-structure collaborative design on online debate in terms of decision making, critical thinking, and interaction pattern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39
Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). On-line interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57–74.
King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem-solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Computing, 5
Klein, J. D., & Doran, M. S. (1999). Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47
Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7
Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46
Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers & Education, 40
Naidu, S. (1997). Collaborative reflective practice: And instructional design architecture for the Internet. Distance Education, 18
Olaniran, B., Savage, G. T., & Sorenson, R. L. (1996). Experimental and experiential approaches to teaching face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Communication Education, 45
Oliver, R., & Omari, A. (2001). Student responses to collaborating and learning in a web-based environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17
Pena-Schaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42
Ravits, J. (1997). An ISD model for building online communities: Furthering the dialog. The Annual Proceedings: Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1997 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 297–307.
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52
Ruberg, L. F., Moore, D. M., & Taylor, C. D. (1996). Student participation and interaction in the cmc interchange. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science, 33
Salomon, G. (1999). Computer mediated conferencing in large scale management education. Open Learning, 14
Sapp, D. A., & Simon, J. (2005). Comparing grades in online and face-to-face writing courses: Interpersonal accountability and institutional commitment. Computers and Composition, 22
Savenye, W. C. (2004). Alternatives for assessing learning in web-based distance learning courses. Distance Learning, 1(1), 29–35.
Savenye, W. C. (2005). Learning technology integration from video cases: Development and research issues. In M. Orey, J. McClendon & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (30th ed., pp. 110–126). Westport, CN: Libraries Unlimited.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Kotchman (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 14–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sherman, G. P., & Klein, J. D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43
Smith, B. L., & McGregor, J. (1992). What is cooperative learning? In A. S. Goodsell, M. R. Maher, V. Tino, B. L. Smith, & J. McGregor (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. Washington DC: ERIC.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Point-counterpoint: Ability grouping; cooperative learning and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(3), 3–8.
Slavin, R. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. Elementary School Journal, 93
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42
Susman, E. B. (1998). Cooperative learning: A review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18
Swing, S. R., & Peterson, P. L. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small group ability and small group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 259–274.
The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2005). IT by the numbers. Retrieved June 6, 2005, from The Chronicle of Higher Education Web Site: http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i21/21b02901.htm.
Uribe, D., Klein, J. D., & Sullivan, H. (2003). The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving ill-defined problems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51
VanDehey, T., & Thorsen, C. (2002). Model technology integration school program. Boise, ID: Boise State University.
Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13
Warkentin, M., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. T. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28
Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13
Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.