Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards multidimensional approaches to research on rural science education

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams, E., Yen, C.-F., Blatt, E., & Ho, L. (2010). Unpacking the complex influences of schooling, sense of place and culture on the motivation of Taiwanese elementary students to learn science in school: Using a socio-cultural approach with phenomenological research methodologies. In D. Zandvliet (Ed.), Diversity in environmental education (pp. 103–129). London: Sense Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, E., Yore, L. D., Bang, M., Brayboy, B., Castagno, A., Kidman, J., Lee, H., Villanueva, M. G., Wang, M. H., Webb, P., & Yen, C-F. (2014). Culturally relevant schooling in science for indigenous learners worldwide: Stressing the all in science literacy for all. In N. G. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 671–697). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2002). Whose scientific knowledge? The colonizer and the colonized. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 39–52). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaska Native Knowledge Network. (n.d). Culturally-based curriculum resources. Retrieved April 11, 2016 from http://ankn.uaf.edu/Resources/course/view.php?id=2.  

  • Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. (n.d.). Research at AIATSIS. Retrieved April 11, 2016 from http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/research/ethical-research.

  • Ball, D. L., & Osborne, M. D. (1998). Teaching with difference: A response to Angela Calabrese Barton: Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 395–397. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:43.3.CO;2-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnhardt, R. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 8–23. doi:10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. (2008). Te kotahitanga: Kaupapa Māori in mainstream classrooms. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. Tuhiwai Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 439–458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Buxton, C. A. (2005). Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and math magnet high school. Science Education , 89(3), 392–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G. (1988). Motivating American Indian students in science and math. Las Cruces: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargo, M., Delormier, T., Lévesque, L., Horn-Miller, K., McComber, A., & Macaulay, A. C. (2008). Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership. Health Education Research, 23, 904–914. doi:10.1093/her/cym077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emdin, C. (2006). Teaching and learning science in an urban school: Analogy as a key to communal science pedagogy. E-Yearbook of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 46, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emdin, C. (2011). Droppin’ science and dropping science: African American males and urban science education. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2, 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, G., & Thomas, A. R. (Eds.). (2014). Studies in urbanormativity: Rural community in urban society. Lanham: MD. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 574–598. doi:10.1002/tea.1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajdik, A. T. (2011). Agicultural romance: Constructing and consuming rural life in modern America. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

  • Harmon, H. L., Henderson, S. A., & Royster, W. C. (2003). A research agenda for improving science and mathematics education in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, M., Milne, M., Reynolds, P., Russell, K., & Smith, B. (2010). Te Ara Tika—Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members. Auckland, New Zealand: Health Research Council of New Zealand. Retrieved from www.hrc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/Te%20Ara%20Tika%20Guidelines%20for%20Maori%20Research%20Ethics.pdf.

  • Jacobs, B., Roffenbender, J., Collman, J., Cherry, K., Bitsòi, L. L., Bassett, K., & Evans, C. H, Jr. (2010). Bridging the divide between genomic science and indigenous peoples. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 38, 684–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leap, W. L. (1982). Dimensions of math avoidance among American Indian elementary school students (pp. ED 244–ED 748). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M., Dupuis, J., & Tang, J. (2012). Classrooms and culture: The role of context in shaping motivation and identity for science learning in Indigenous adolescents. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 111–141. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9385-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. S., & Hodges, G. (2014). Rural science education: New ideas, redirections, and broadened definitions. In N. G. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 266–283). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2002). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing: Learning environments research as classroom praxis. Learning Environments Research, 5, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarche, M., Novins, D., & Belcourt-Dittloff, A. (2010). Engaged scholarship with tribal communities. In H. E. Fitzgerald, C. Burack, & S. Seifer (Eds.), Handbook of engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions (Vol. 1, pp. 215–233). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (n.d.). Aboriginal research. Retrieved from www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/priority_areas-domaines_prioritaires/aboriginal_research-recherche_autochtone-eng.aspx.

  • Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education (2010). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/schools/accountability.html.

  • Walker, R. (2007). Sociocultural perspectives on academic regulation and identity: Theoretical issues. In Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest, Hungary.

  • Young, D. J. (2000). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multileveled analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 386–418. doi:10.1080/0924345980090403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    Eleanor Abrams

  2. College of Education and Human Development, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, 02125, USA

    Michael Middleton

Authors
  1. Eleanor Abrams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Middleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleanor Abrams.

Additional information

Lead Editors: L. Avery and D. Long.

This paper is part of the special issue Cultural Studies of Rural Science Education.

This review essay addresses issues raised in Avery & Hains’s paper entitled: Oral traditions: a contextual framework for complex science concepts. doi:10.1007/s11422-016-9761-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abrams, E., Middleton, M. Towards multidimensional approaches to research on rural science education. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 167–176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9748-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9748-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation