Abstract
Opportunities for American Indian youth to meaningfully engage in school-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) experiences have historically been inadequate. As a consequence, American Indian students perform lower on standardized assessments of science education than their peers. In this article we describe the emergence of meaning for students—as well as their community—resulting from Indigenous culturally-based STEM curriculum that used an American Indian tradition as a focal context. Specifically, the game of snow snakes (Gooneginebig in Ojibwe) afforded an opportunity for STEM and culturally-based resources to work in unison. A case study research design was used with the bounded case represented by the community associated with the snow snake project. The research question guiding this study was: What forms of culturally relevant meaning do students and the community form as a result of the snow snake game? Results indicate evidence of increased student and community engagement through culturally-based STEM experiences in the form of active participation and the rejuvenation of a traditional game. Implications are discussed for using culturally-based contexts for STEM learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term “American Indian” is used throughout the article. American Indian is a federally recognized term; in addition, through multiple conversations with individuals who identify themselves as American Indian, the use of the term was deemed appropriate.
Although snow snakes was played historically in the community associated with this study, the game was not an active part of students’ lives prior to the efforts described in this article.
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180–188. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<180:AID-SCE50>3.0.CO;2-1.
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 1008–1026. doi:10.1002/sce.20392.
Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36, 8–23. doi:10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.008.
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73. doi:10.1002/tea.20269.
Belgarde, M., Mitchell, R., & Arquero, A. (2002). What do we have to do to create culturally responsive programs? The challenge of transforming American Indian teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 24, 42–54. doi:10.1080/01626620.2002.10734418.
Brayboy, B. M. J., & Castagno, A. E. (2008). How might Native science inform “informal science learning”? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 731–750. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9125-x.
Brayboy, B., & Castagno, A. E. (2009). Self-determination through self-education: Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous students in the USA. Teaching Education, 20, 31–53. doi:10.1080/10476210802681709.
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 3–11. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classroom. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 369–387. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x.
Cajete, G. A. (2005). American Indian epistemologies. New Directions for Student Services, 109, 69–78. doi:10.1002/ss.155.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218. doi:10.1002/tea.20237.
Castagno, A. E., & Brayboy, B. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78, 941–993. doi:10.3102/0034654308323036.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7.
Cleary, L. M., & Peacock, T. D. (1998). Collected wisdom: American Indian education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Corson, D. (1999). Community-based education for Indigenous cultures. In S. May (Ed.), Indigenous community-based education (pp. 8–19). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Culin, S. (1975). Games of the North American Indians. New York: Dover.
Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. B., Sandmann, A, Jr, & Ahern, J. (1999). Literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 421–430. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17504.x.
Deloria, V., Jr. (1992). Relativity, relatedness and reality. Winds of Change (Autumn), 35–40.
Demmert, W., & Towner, J. (2003). A review of the research literature on the influences of culturally based education on the academic performance of Native American students. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Lab.
Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education, 27, 197–215. doi:10.1080/01587910600789571.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–472. doi:10.17763/haer.65.3.r16146n25h4mh384.
Herrera, F. A., Hurtado, S., Garcia, G. A., & Gasiewski, J. (2012). A model for redefining STEM identity for talented STEM graduate students. In American educational research association annual conference, Vancouver B.C.
Kawagley, A. O. (1995). A Yupiaq worldview: A pathway to ecology and spirit. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Kawagley, A. O., & Barnhardt, R. (1999). Education Indigenous to place: Western science meets Native reality. In G. A. Smith & D. R. Williams (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment (pp. 117–140). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Lawrence, B. (2003). Gender, race, and the regulation of Native identity in Canada and the United States: An overview. Hypatia, 18, 3–31. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb00799.x.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617508.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296:AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R.
Lipka, J., Hogan, M. P., Webster, J. P., Yanez, E., Adams, B., Clark, S., & Lacy, D. (2005). Math in a cultural context: Two case studies of a successful culturally based math project. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36, 367–385. doi:10.1525/aeq.2005.36.4.367.
Lipka, J., Mohatt, G. V., & The Ciulistet Group. (1998). Transforming the culture of schools: Yup’ik Eskimo examples. New York: Routledge.
May, S. (Ed.). (1999). Indigenous community-based education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
McKinley, E. (2007). Postcolonialism, Indigenous students, and science education. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 199–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Meriam, L., Brown, R., Cloud, H., Dale, E., Duke, E., Edwards, H., et al. (1928). The problem of Indian administration: Report of a survey made at the request of the Honorable Hubert Wrok, Secretary of the Interior, and submitted to him, February 21 st , 1928. Baltimore: The Brookings Institute.
Miller, B. G., Doering, A., Roehrig, G., & Shimek, R. (2012). Fostering Indigenous STEM education: Mobilizing the adventure learning framework through snow snakes. Journal of American Indian Education, 51, 66–84.
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469–498. doi:10.1002/tea.1014.
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2005). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moran, R., Rampey, B. D., Dion, G. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2008). National Indian education study 2007 part I: Performance of American Indian and Alaska Native students at grades 4 and 8 on NAEP 2007 reading and mathematics assessments. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (NCES 2008457)
National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) Resource Center (Producer). (2007). Snowsnake: Game of the Haudenosaunee [DVD]. http://nmai.si.edu/visit/newyork/resource-center/.
National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Newmann, F., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers college Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Powers, K. M. (2006). An exploratory study of cultural identity and culture-based educational programs for urban American Indian students. Urban Education, 41, 20–49. doi:10.1177/0042085905282249.
Puvirajah, A., Verma, G., & Webb, H. (2012). Examining the mediation of power in a collaborative community: Engaging in informal science as authentic practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 375–408. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9394-2.
Rahm, J. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 164–184. doi:10.1002/tea.10015.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1.
Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33–56. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/11/1/302.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68, 20–26.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
Smith, G. H. (1992). Research issues related to Maori education. The Issue of Research and Maori, 1–9.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books. doi:10.1038/70963.
Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85, 6–34. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<6:AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-R.
Verma, G., Puvirajah, A., & Webb, H. (2015). Enacting acts of authentication in a robotics competition: An interpretivist study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 268–295. doi:10.1002/tea.21195.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803932.
White Earth Reservation Curriculum Committee. (1989). White earth: A history. Cass Lake, MN: The Minnesota Chippewa Tribe.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
Yore, L. D. (2008). Science literacy for all students: Language, culture, and knowledge about nature and naturally occurring events. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8, 5–21.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0737565. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The snow snake curriculum was the result of a very thoughtful collaboration between the people of the White Earth Nation and the University of Minnesota. More importantly, the snow snake curriculum would not have been possible if it were not for the tribal communities that created this beautiful game and have kept the tradition alive amidst the technological age in which we all live. A special thank you is extended to the knowledge keepers that keep the flame of tradition, language, and sport burning. A special thank you is also extended to Robert Shimek for his willingness to share his knowledge throughout this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: student initial, midpoint, and final interview questions
Appendix: student initial, midpoint, and final interview questions
Initial student interview | |
---|---|
What are two things about learning activities at your school that you really like, or that are really important to you? | Probes: Why is it really important to you? What do you like about it? What does it mean to you? |
What are two things about learning activities at your school that you wish were different, or that you might like to change? | Probes: Why would you like to change it? How do you wish that it was? What do you think you could do to change it? Do you think that would make a difference? What do you think would need to happen for it to change? Is there anything else you would really like to change? |
What is your favorite subject in school? | Probes: Why is it your favorite subject? Can you tell me a story about an experience with that subject that makes it your favorite? |
What is your least favorite subject in school? | Probes: Why is it your least favorite subject? Can you tell me a story about an experience with that subject that makes it your least favorite? |
Do you feel like you are good at science? Explain. | Probe: Can you tell me how you might use what you have learned about science through snow snakes in your life? |
Do you think science can help you in your life? How? | Probes: How did you learn these two things? Can you tell me about how you might use science in your life? For what purposes would you use science? |
What would you say to your little brother or sister (or someone younger) if he or she were wondering what science was? What would you tell them? How would you describe science to them? Are there other things that you think of? What would you say to a student at your school that said, “What’s the point of learning science?” What would you say if the student said that they have learned enough science already? |
Midpoint student interview | |
---|---|
What is a snow snake? | Probes: Can you tell me about your experience with snow snakes to this point? |
What snow snake experiences stick out in your mind so far? Highlights? Why are these experiences memorable to you? | Probes: Classroom activities? Computer activities? Outside activities? |
What have you learned about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics while working with snow snakes? | Probes: Was there an area of science, technology, engineering and mathematics that stuck out more than another? |
Can you tell me about an experience where you have felt success with snow snakes? To this point in snow snake activities, do you feel that you have been successful in what you have been asked to do? | Probes: What made you feel successful? What did success feel like? |
Do you feel like you are good at science? Explain. | Probe: Can you tell me how you might use what you have learned about science through snow snakes in your life? |
Can you tell me about your experience with snow snakes on the computer? | Probes: What part of snow snakes on the computer have you liked the best? Why? |
Final student interview | |
---|---|
In your mind, how were snow snake activities done in school different from other school activities? How were snow snake activities similar to other school subjects? | Probes: Were you more interested in snow snake activities compared to other school activities? |
Are there snow snake activities that were memorable to you? Please explain. Are there snow snake activities that you feel were useful to you? Please explain. | Probes: How could the things you have learned through snow snakes be used in other parts of your life? |
Can you tell me two things you learned about science through snow snakes? | Probes: How did you learn these two things? Can you tell me about how you might use science in your life? |
Can you tell me two things you know about math through snow snakes? | Probes: How did you learn these two things? Can you tell me about how you might use math in your life? |
Can you tell me two things you know about technology through snow snakes? | Probes: How did you learn these two things? Can you tell me about how you might use technology in your life? |
Can you tell me two things you know about engineering through snow snakes? | Probes: How did you learn these two things? Can you tell me about how you might use engineering in your life? |
What would you say to your little brother or sister (or someone younger) if he or she were wondering what science was? What would you tell them? | |
Tell me about how your ideas from the snow snake prototypes worked in constructing your full size snow snake. Was making prototypes helpful to your thinking about how a snow snake travels and designing your full size snow snake? Can you explain? | |
Did you participate in the snow snake festival last weekend? If so, tell me about your experience | Probes: What was the best part about the snow snake festival for you? |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, B.G., Roehrig, G. Indigenous cultural contexts for STEM experiences: snow snakes’ impact on students and the community. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 13, 31–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9738-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9738-4