Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How could it be? calling for science curricula that cultivate morals and values towards other animals and nature

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Can science curricula truly cultivate morals and values towards nature? This is the question that is raised by Carolina Castano Rodriguez in her critique of the new Australian Science curriculum. In this response to Castano Rodriguez’s paper we ask two questions relating to: the influence of curricula on the relationships of children and other animals; and other models of science education regarding animals and nature that may be more relevant, just, or caring. In responding to these questions stimulated by the reading of Castano Rodriguez’s paper, we reflect on our own experiences. We note the conflict between the values depicted in the curriculum priorities and the underlying anthropocentric view that appears to be embedded in the Australian Science Curriculum and in curricula generally. With this conflict in mind we encourage educators to examine our own practices regarding how the relationships between humans and other animals are promoted. We put forward the idea of science education that responds to the shifting views of science and its applications outside the confines of the laboratory to one that encourages both ethical and political discussion that is already taking place in the community relating to the role of science and technology in our lives and the lives of other animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), (2015). Cross curriculum priorities. Sydney: ACARA. Retrieved October 20, 2015 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumpriorities/sustainability/overview.

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), (2015b). The Australian curriculum science (Foundation to 10) (Version 8). Sydney: ACARA. Retrieved October 20, 2015 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/download/f10.

  • Birke, L. (1995). Exploring the boundaries: Feminism, animals, and science. In C. J. Adams & J. Donovan (Eds.), Animals and women feminist theoretical explorations. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

  • Castano, C. (2012). Fostering compassionate attitudes and the amelioration of aggression through a science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 961–986. doi:10.1002/tea.21023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castano Rodriguez, C. (2015). Which values regarding nature and other species are we promoting in the Australian Science Curriculum? Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9675-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action. Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. doi:10.1080/09500690305021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. (2002). Linking school science education with action. Counterpoints, 210, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., & Chubin, D. (2000). Introduction. In D. D. Kumar & D. E. Chubin (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice (pp. 2–8). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzich, S. (2011). It’s not only green that matters: Understanding education for sustainability in schools. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 7(3), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H. (2010). Is ‘the posthuman’educable? on the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 237–250. doi:10.1080/01596301003679750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621. doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldau, P. (2013). Animal studies: An introduction. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583–584. doi:10.1126/science.1250515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast Campus, Coolangatta, QLD, Australia

    Marianne R. Logan

  2. Animal Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, Canisius College, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Joshua J. Russell

Authors
  1. Marianne R. Logan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua J. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne R. Logan.

Additional information

Lead editor: C.B. Brandt.

This review essay addresses issues raised in Carolina Castano Rodriguez’s paper entitled: Which values regarding nature and other species are we promoting in the Australian Science Curriculum? DOI:10.1007/s11422-015-9675-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Logan, M.R., Russell, J.J. How could it be? calling for science curricula that cultivate morals and values towards other animals and nature. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 11, 1023–1028 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9727-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9727-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation