Abstract
Steven Vertovec (2006, 2007) has recently offered a re-interpretation of population diversity in large urban centres due to a considerable increase in immigration patterns in the UK. This complex scenario called superdiversity has been conceptualised to help illuminate significant interactions of variables such as religion, language, gender, age, nationality, labour market and population distribution on a larger scale. The interrelationships of these themes have fundamental implications in a variety of community environments, but especially within our schools. Today, London schools have over 300 languages being spoken by students, all of whom have diverse backgrounds, bringing with them a wealth of experience and, most critically, their own set of religious beliefs. At the same time, Science is a compulsory subject in England’s national curriculum, where it requires teachers to deal with important scientific frameworks about the world; teaching about the origins of the universe, life on Earth, human evolution and other topics, which are often in conflict with students’ religious views. In order to cope with this dynamic and thought-provoking environment, science initial teacher education (SITE)—especially those catering large urban centres—must evolve to equip science teachers with a meaningful understanding of how to handle a superdiverse science classroom, taking the discourse of inclusion beyond its formal boundaries. Thus, this original position paper addresses how the role of SITE may be re-conceptualised and re-framed in light of the immense challenges of superdiversity as well as how science teachers, as enactors of the science curriculum, must adapt to cater to these changes. This is also the first in a series of papers emerging from an empirical research project trying to capture science teacher educators’ own views on religio-scientific issues and their positions on the place of these issues within science teacher education and the science classroom.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. doi:10.1080/03057269608560077.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders in school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180–188. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<180:AID-SCE50>3.0.CO;2-1.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269:AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2T.
Alsop, S. (2005). Beyond cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_1.
Arnaut, K. (2012). Super-diversity: Elements of an emerging perspective. Diversities, 14(2), 1–15.
Barbour, I. G. (1990). Religion in an age of science. London: SCM.
Bausor, J., & Poole, M. (2003). Science and religion in the agreed syllabuses—an investigation and some suggestions. British Journal of Religious Education, 25(1), 18–32. doi:10.1080/0141620020250103->.
BBC (2008). Tests ‘damaging’ to school system. BBC News online. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7396623.stm Accessed 24 May 2014.
Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education (pp. 47–69). London: Collier Macmillan.
Billingsley, B., Riga, F., Taber, K. S., & Newdick, H. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on teaching about topics that bridge science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 372–395. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.920264.
Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., Letts, I., William, J., & Shipman, H. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 340–362. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<340:AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-D.
Cantor, G., & Kenny, C. (2001). Barbour’s fourfold way: Problems with his taxonomy of science-religion relationships. Zygon, 36(4), 765–781. doi:10.1111/0591-2385.00395.
Clement, P., Quessada, M., Laurent, C. and Carvalho, G. (2008). Science and religion: evolutionism and creationism in education: a survey of teachers conceptions in 14 countries. (online) Paper presented at: XIII IOSTE Symposium, Izmir (Turkey), 21–26 September 2008. Retrieved from http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/8934/1/IOSTE_Evolution.pdf Accessed 27 May 2014.
Cobern, W., & Loving, C. (2001). Defining” science” in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 50–67. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<50:AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-G.
Collins, S. and Reiss, M. and Stobart, G. (2009) The effects of national testing in science at Key Stage 2 in England and Wales. Executive Summary. Commissioned by The Wellcome Trust in association with the ASE. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_peda/documents/web_document/wtd039972.pdf Accessed 20 May 2014.
Dagher, Z., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 429–445. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<429:AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion (1st ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
De Carvalho, R. (2013). The Big Bang theory—coping with multi-religious beliefs in the super-diverse science classroom. School Science Review, 95(350), 119–126.
De Saint-Georges, I. (2013). Multilingualism, multimodality and the future of education research. In De Saint-Georges, I., & Weber, J-J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2.
DfE (Department for Education) (2010). The schools’ white paper 2010—the importance of teaching. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175429/CM-7980.pdf Accessed 23 May 2014.
DfE (Department for Education) (2013). Science—GCSE content and assessment objectives. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/211219/GCSE_Sciences_final_updated.pdf Accessed 23 May 2014.
Dodick, J., Dayan, A., & Orion, N. (2010). Philosophical approaches of religious Jewish science teachers toward the teaching of ‘controversial’ topics in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1521–1548. doi:10.1080/09500690903518060.
Downie, R. J., & Barron, N. J. (2000). Evolution and religion: Attitudes of Scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 139–146. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655704.
El-Hani, C., & Sepulveda, C. (2010). The relationships between science and religion in the education of protestant biology preservice teachers in a Brazilian university. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 103–125. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9212-7.
Eurydice (2013). Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe. 2013 Edition. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Ferguson, J., & Kameniar, B. (2014). Is ‘learning’ science enough? A cultural model of religious students of science in an Australian government school. International Journal of Science Education, Published online on 1st April 2014, 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2014.904060#tabModule Accessed 21 May 2014. doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.904060.
Fysh, R., & Lucas, K. (1998). Religious beliefs in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 399–427.
Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143–152. doi:10.1177/0022487109347320.
Gogolin, I. (2011). The challenge of super diversity for education in Europe. Education Inquiry, 2(2), 239–249. doi:10.3402/edui.v2i2.21976.
Gove, M. (2013) Speech: Michael Gove speaks about the importance of teaching. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speaks-about-the-importance-of-teaching Accessed 20 May 2014.
Hagger, H., & McIntyre, D. (2006). Learning about teaching from teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Hanley, P., Bennett, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2014). The Inter-relationships of science and religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1210–1229. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.853897.
Hipkins, R., Barker, M., & Bolstad, R. (2005). Teaching the ‘nature of science’: Modest adaptations or radical reconceptions? International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 243–254. doi:10.1080/0950069042000276758.
Kegan, R. (2009). What ‘form’ transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists… in their own words (pp. 35–52). London: Routledge.
Kingston, A., Day, C., Simmons, P., Regan, E., Brown, E., & Gunraj, J. (2012). What makes teachers effective? Profiles of innovative classroom practice. In C. Day (Ed.), The routeldge international handbook of teacher and school development (1st ed., pp. 319–334). Abingdon, Oxon: Routeldge.
Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross‐cultural comparison of Korean and American science teachers’ views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 197–227. doi:10.1080/09500690903563819.
Liu, S., & Lederman, N. (2007). Exploring prospective teachers’ worldviews and conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1281–1307. doi:10.1080/09500690601140019.
Loving, C., & Foster, A. (2000). The religion-in-the-science-classroom issue: Seeking graduate student conceptual change. Science Education, 84(4), 445–468. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200007)84:4<445:AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-6.
Mansour, N. (2008). Religious beliefs: A hidden variable in the performance of science teachers in the classroom. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 557–576. doi:10.2304/eerj.2008.7.4.557.
Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 95(2), 281–309. doi:10.1002/sce.20418.
Martin-Hansen, L. (2008). First-year college students’ conflict with religion and science. Science & Education, 17(4), 317–357. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9039-5.
Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists … in their own words (pp. 90–105). London: Routledge.
Millar, R., & Abrahams, I. (2009). Practical work: Making it more effective. School Science Review, 91(334), 59–64.
Milner, H. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 118–131. doi:10.1177/0022487109347670.
Newton, D. P. (1988). Making science education relevant. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
OFSTED, (2013). Ofsted | Maintaining curiosity: A survey into science education in schools. (online). Retrieved from: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/maintaining-curiosity-survey-science-education-schools Accessed 21 May 2014.
Ozdemir, G., & Clark, D. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 351–361.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Education Research, 62(3), 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307.
Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250. doi:10.1525/aeq.1991.22.3.05x1051k.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207.
Reiss, M. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 157–186. doi:10.1080/03057260802264214.
Reiss, M. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(3), 399–415. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00790.x.
Roth, W. (1997). The interaction of students’ scientific and religious discourses: Two case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 125–146. doi:10.1080/0950069970190201.
SCORE (2008) Practical work in science: A report and proposal for a strategic framework. Science community representing education report. December 2008. Retrieved from http://score-education.org/media/3668/report.pdf Accessed 20 May 2014.
Shepherd, J. (2010, August 13). Pupils do better at school if teachers are not fixated on test results. The Guardian online. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/aug/13/exam-test-results-teaching-style Accessed 25 May 2014.
Shipman, H., Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., & Letts, W. (2002). Changes in student views of religion and science in a college astronomy course. Science Education, 86(4), 526–547. doi:10.1002/sce.1002.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Reseach in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528. doi:10.1002/tea.10087.
Stolberg, T. (2007). The Religio-scientific frameworks of pre-service primary teachers: An analysis of their influence on their teaching of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 909–930. doi:10.1080/09500690600924934.
Sutherland, D., & Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 1–25. doi:10.1080/09500690110067011.
Taber, K., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationships between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025. doi:10.1002/sce.20459.
The Guardian (2006, July 20). Too many teachers ‘teaching to the test’. The Guardian Online. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2006/jul/20/schools.uk5 Accessed 23 May 2014.
The Telegraph (2008). Ofsted: Schools ‘teaching to the test’. The Telegraph online. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2440091/Ofsted-Schools-teaching-to-the-test.html Accessed 22 May 2014.
The telegraph (2010). Sats exams promote ‘teaching to the test’. The Telegraph online. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7559726/Sats-exams-promote-teaching-to-the-test.html Accessed 24 May 2014.
Trani, R. (2004). I won’t teach evolution. It’s against my religion. And now for the rest of the story. The American Biology Teacher, 66(6), 419–427. doi:10.2307/4451708.
Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain. Centre on migration, policy and society—working paper No 25. COMPAS - University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/files/Publications/working_papers/WP_2006/WP0625_Vertovec.pdf Accessed 26 May 2014.
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and racial studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. doi:10.1080/01419870701599465.
Von Ahn, M.,Lupton, R.,Greenwood, C., & Wiggins, D. (2010). Languages, ethnicities and education in London. DoQSS working paper No.10–12. Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved from http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1012.pdf Accessed 20 May 2014.
Waldrip, B. G., Timothy, J. T., & Wilikai, W. (2007). Pedagogic principles in negotiating cultural conflict: A melanesian example. International Journal of Science Education, 29(1), 101–122. doi:10.1080/09500690600718195.
Wasicsko, M. M., Wirtz, P., & Resor, C. (2009). Using dispositions in the teacher admission process. SRATE Journal, 18(2), 19–26.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education (1st ed.). Buckingham: Open University.
Woods, A., & Luke, A. (2012). Innovative pedagogies. In C. Day (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Teacher and School Development (1st ed., pp. 313–318). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Yasri, P., & Mancy, R. (2014). Understanding student approaches to learning evolution in the context of their perceptions of the relationships between science and religion. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 24–45. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.715315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: M. J. Reiss.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Carvalho, R. Science initial teacher education and superdiversity: educating science teachers for a multi-religious and globalised science classroom. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 11, 253–272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9671-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9671-y