Abstract
This paper is written in response to Nancy Davis’s article Integral Methodological Pluralism in Science Education Research: Valuing Multiple Perspectives. I use Integral Theory as a framing for this response to explore how it might offer different perspectives and ways of inquiring into Nancy’s paper. This process highlights the notion of integral inquiry as a potential for personal transformation. I give an autobiographical account of my own experience in utilising Integral Theory as part of my PhD and its impact on my own becoming. For another perspective I interview Nancy to draw out deeper shared meanings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, E. D., & Cowan, C. C. (1996). Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership and challenge. Maldeen: Blackwell Publishing.
Braud, W., & Anderson, R. (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honouring human experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gebser, J. (1985). The ever present origin (authorized translation by Noel Barstad with Algis Mickunas). Athens, GA: Ohio University Press.
Henderson, J. G., & Kesson, K. R. (2004). Curriculum wisdom: Educational decisions in democratic societies. New Jersey: Pearson.
Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problems and process in human development. London: Harvard University Press.
Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Stack, S. (2006). Integrating science and soul in education: The lived experience of a science educator bringing holistic and integral perspectives to the transformation of science teaching. Dissertation. Retreived on 7/03/2013 from: http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=162603&local_base=GEN01-ERA02.
Wilber, K. (1998). The marriage of sense and soul. Melbourne, Australia: The Hill of Content.
Wilber, K. (2000a). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Wilber, K. (2000b). Integral psychology. Boston, MA: Shambala.
Yorks, L., & Marsick, V. J. (2000). Organizational learning and transformation. In: J. Mezirow & Associates. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. (pp. 253–281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead editor: P.C. Taylor.
This paper responds to issues raised in N. Davis and L. Callihan’s (2013) paper “Integral methodological pluralism in science education research: valuing multiple perspectives”, doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9480-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stack, S. Science education, integral inquiry, transformation and possibility. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 521–527 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9525-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9525-4