Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Science education, integral inquiry, transformation and possibility

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is written in response to Nancy Davis’s article Integral Methodological Pluralism in Science Education Research: Valuing Multiple Perspectives. I use Integral Theory as a framing for this response to explore how it might offer different perspectives and ways of inquiring into Nancy’s paper. This process highlights the notion of integral inquiry as a potential for personal transformation. I give an autobiographical account of my own experience in utilising Integral Theory as part of my PhD and its impact on my own becoming. For another perspective I interview Nancy to draw out deeper shared meanings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, E. D., & Cowan, C. C. (1996). Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership and challenge. Maldeen: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braud, W., & Anderson, R. (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honouring human experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebser, J. (1985). The ever present origin (authorized translation by Noel Barstad with Algis Mickunas). Athens, GA: Ohio University Press.

  • Henderson, J. G., & Kesson, K. R. (2004). Curriculum wisdom: Educational decisions in democratic societies. New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problems and process in human development. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (2006). Integrating science and soul in education: The lived experience of a science educator bringing holistic and integral perspectives to the transformation of science teaching. Dissertation. Retreived on 7/03/2013 from: http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=162603&local_base=GEN01-ERA02.

  • Wilber, K. (1998). The marriage of sense and soul. Melbourne, Australia: The Hill of Content.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (2000a). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Boston, MA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (2000b). Integral psychology. Boston, MA: Shambala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorks, L., & Marsick, V. J. (2000). Organizational learning and transformation. In: J. Mezirow & Associates. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. (pp. 253–281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Stack.

Additional information

Lead editor: P.C. Taylor.

This paper responds to issues raised in N. Davis and L. Callihan’s (2013) paper “Integral methodological pluralism in science education research: valuing multiple perspectives”, doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9480-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stack, S. Science education, integral inquiry, transformation and possibility. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 521–527 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9525-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9525-4

Keywords

Navigation