Ideal Femoral Head Size in Total Hip Arthroplasty Balances Stability and Volumetric Wear
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Over the last several years, a trend towards increasing femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty to improve stability and impingement free range of motion has been observed.
The specific questions we sought to answer in our review were: (1) What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-ceramic, and metal-on-polyethylene bearings? (2) What is effect that femoral head size has on joint kinematics? (3) What is the effect that large femoral heads have on bearing surface wear?
A PubMed search and a review of 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society abstracts was performed and articles were chosen that directly answered components of the specific aims and that reported outcomes with contemporary implant designs or materials.
A review of the literature suggests that increasing femoral head size decreases the risk of postoperative dislocation and improves impingement free range of motion; however, volumetric wear increases with large femoral heads on polyethylene and increases corrosion of the stem in large metal-on-metal modular total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the risk of potentially developing osteolysis or adverse reactions to metal debris respectively is still unknown. Further, the effect of large femoral heads with ceramic-on-ceramic THA is unclear, due to limited availability and published data.
Surgeons must balance the benefits of larger head size with the increased risk of volumetric wear when determining the appropriate head size for a given patient.
- Ali Khan, MA, Brakenbury, PH, Reynolds, IS (1981) Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63-B: pp. 214-218
- Amlie, E, Høvik, Ø, Reikerås, O (2010) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32 mm femoral head. J Orthop Traumatol 11: pp. 111-115 CrossRef
- Amstutz, HC, Lodwig, RM, Schurman, DJ, Hodgson, AG (1975) Range of motion studies for total hip replacements: a comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 111: pp. 124-130 CrossRef
- Bartel, DL, Bicknell, VL, Wright, TM (1986) The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 68: pp. 1041-1051
- Bartz, RL, Noble, PC, Kadakia, NR, Tullos, HS (2000) The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 82-A: pp. 1300-1307
- Beaulé, PE, Schmalzried, TP, Udomkiat, P, Amstutz, HC (2002) Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A: pp. 256-263
- Bolland, BJ, Culliford, DJ, Langton, DJ, Millington, JP, Arden, NK, Latham, JM (2011) High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93: pp. 608-615 CrossRef
- Bystrom, S, Espehaug, B, Furnes, O, Havelin, L (2003) Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norweigian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scan 74: pp. 514-524 CrossRef
- Chandler, DR, Glousman, R, Hull, D (1982) Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement: the effects of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 166: pp. 284-291
- Clarke, IC, Manley, MT (2008) Implant Wear Symposium 2007 Engineering Work Group. How do alternative bearing surfaces influence wear behavior?. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 16: pp. S86-S93
- Cobb, JP, Davda, K, Ahmad, A, Harris, SJ, Masjedi, M, Hart, AJ (2011) Why large-head metal-on-metal hip replacements are painful: the anatomical basis of psoas impingement on the femoral head–neck junction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 93: pp. 881-885 CrossRef
- Cuckler, JM, Moore, KD, Lombardi, AV, McPherson, E, Emerson, R (2004) Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19: pp. 41-44 CrossRef
- Dorlot, JM, Christel, P, Meunier, A (1989) Wear analysis of retrieved alumina heads and sockets of hip prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 23: pp. 299-310 CrossRef
- Dowd, JE, Sychterz, CJ, Young, AM (2000) Characterization of long-term femoral head penetration rates. Association with and prediction of osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 82-A: pp. 1102
- Dumbleton, JH, Manley, MT, Edidin, AA (2002) A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 17: pp. 649-661 CrossRef
- Dyrkacz RMR, Turgeon T, Ojo O, Brandt JM, Wyss U. Head size affects corrosion behavior in artificial hip joints. Transactions of the 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.
- Evans P, Lipman J, Rajadhyaksha A, Westrich G. Evaluating the effect of head size and implant design on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty utilizing computerized virtual surgery. Unpublished data from Hospital for Special Surgery.
- Fritsch, EW, Gleitz, M (1996) Ceramic femoral head fractures in total hip arthoplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 328: pp. 129 CrossRef
- Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91(12):1566–1574.
- He, RX, Yan, SG, Wu, LD, Wang, XH, Dai, XS (2007) Position of the prosthesis and the incidence of dislocation following total hip replacement. Chin Med J (Engl) 120: pp. 1140-1144
- Hamilton, WG, McAuley, JP, Dennis, DA, Murphy, JA, Blumenfeld, TJ, Politi, J (2010) THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 468: pp. 358-366 CrossRef
- Hammerberg, EM, Wan, Z, Dastane, M, Dorr, LD (2010) Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty. 25: pp. 839-843 CrossRef
- Hummel, MT, Malkani, AL, Yakkanti, MR, Baker, DL (2009) Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair. J Arthroplasty 24: pp. 73-76 CrossRef
- Jameson, SS, Lees, D, James, P, Serrano-Pedraza, I, Partington, PF, Muller, SD, Meek, RM, Reed, MR (2011) Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement: a five-year analysis of NHS patients in England. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 93: pp. 876-880 CrossRef
- Johnston, RC, Smidt, GL (1970) Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 72: pp. 205-215
- Kelley, SS, Lachiewicz, PF, Hickman, JM, Paterno, SM (1998) Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 355: pp. 163-170 CrossRef
- Kurtz, SM, Gawel, HA, Patel, JD (2011) History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 469: pp. 2262-2277 CrossRef
- Lachiewicz, PF, Heckman, DS, Soileau, ES, Mangla, J, Martell, JM (2009) Femoral head size and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene at 5 to 8 years. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 467: pp. 3290-3296 CrossRef
- Livingston, BJ, Chmell, MJ, Spector, M, Poss, R (1997) Complications of total hip arthroplasty associated with the use of an acetabular component with a Hylamer liner. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 79: pp. 1529
- Lombardi, AV, Skeels, MD, Berend, KR, Adams, JB, Franchi, OJ (2011) Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469: pp. 1547-1553 CrossRef
- Muratoglu, OK, Bragdon, CR, O’Connor, D (2001) Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: a new concept. J Arthroplasty. 16: pp. 24 CrossRef
- Nakahara, I, Nakamura, N, Takao, M, Sakai, T, Nishii, T, Sugano, N (2011) Eight-year wear analysis in longevity highly cross-linked polyethylene liners comparing 26- and 32-mm heads. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 131: pp. 1731-1737 CrossRef
- Sayeed, SA, Mont, MA, Costa, CR, Johnson, AJ, Naziri, Q, Bonutti, PM, Delanois, RE (2011) Early outcomes of sequentially cross-linked thin polyethylene liners with large diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 69: pp. S90-S94
- Sikes, CV, Lai, LP, Schreiber, M, Mont, MA, Jinnah, RH, Seyler, TM (2008) Instability after total hip arthroplasty: treatment with large femoral heads vs constrained liners. J Arthroplasty. 23: pp. 59-63 CrossRef
- Sochart, D (1999) Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 363: pp. 135
- Smith, TM, Berend, KR, Lombardi, AV, Emerson, RH, Mallory, TH (2005) Metal-on-metal total hip arthoplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 441: pp. 137-142 CrossRef
- Stuchin, SA (2008) Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90: pp. 52-56 CrossRef
- Stralen, GM, Struben, PJ, Loon, CJ (2003) The incidence of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty using posterior approach with posterior soft-tissue repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123: pp. 219-222
- Wellman, G (2000) Ceramic femoral head retrieval data. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 379: pp. 22 CrossRef
- Ideal Femoral Head Size in Total Hip Arthroplasty Balances Stability and Volumetric Wear
HSS Journal ®
Volume 8, Issue 3 , pp 270-274
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- femoral head size
- total hip arthroplasty
- volumetric wear
- large femoral heads
- Industry Sectors