How Often are Patient and Surgeon Recovery Expectations for Total Joint Arthroplasty Aligned? Results of a Pilot Study
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Surgeons strive to set patient expectations for recovery following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, some patients report dissatisfaction after surgery due to unmet expectations.
We compared patients’ and surgeon’s recovery expectations prior to primary THA and TKA.
Sixty eight patients scheduled to undergo primary total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery were enrolled. Before surgery, patients filled out a validated recovery expectations questionnaire that quantified expectations of postoperative pain relief, function, and well-being with a value from 0 to 100 (higher being more optimistic). The surgeon independently completed the same questionnaire for each patient. Overall score and item-specific comparisons were conducted. Correlations were explored between agreement level, demographics, patient-reported health status measures, and patients’ assessments of the risk of complications associated with surgery.
Most patients undergoing THR or TKR had higher expectations for recovery than their surgeon. Applying the clinically meaningful difference in expectations (≥7 points), 52.5% of the TKA patients’ expectations exceeded those of the surgeon, while 22.5% expected less than their surgeon and 60.7% of THA patients’ expectations exceeded those of the surgeon, while 21.4% expected less than their surgeon. THA patients with either lower or higher expectations than their surgeon had lower physical and mental health status scores. TKA patients with lower expectations compared to their surgeon had a higher expectation of complications.
More than 50% of the patients had higher expectations than their surgeon and this was driven by expectations of high-level activities and extreme range of motion. Further investigations are needed to understand these differences so as to enhance patient preoperative education.
- Bellamy, N (2005) The WOMAC Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN Hand Osteoarthritis Indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 23: pp. S148-S153
- Bellamy, N, Buchanan, WW, Goldsmith, CH, Campbell, J, Stitt, LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 15: pp. 1833-1840
- Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.
- Bozic, KJ, Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Ong, K, Vail, TP, Berry, DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91: pp. 128-133 CrossRef
- Burns, AC (1992) The expanded health belief model as a basis for enlightened preventive health care practice and research. J Health Care Mark. 12: pp. 32-45
- Groeneveld, PW, Kwoh, CK, Mor, MK, Appelt, CJ, Geng, M, Gutierrez, JC, Wessel, DS, Ibrahim, SA (2008) Racial differences in expectations of joint replacement surgery outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 59: pp. 730-737 CrossRef
- Iversen, MD, Daltroy, LH, Fossel, AH, Katz, JN (1998) The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns. 34: pp. 169-178 CrossRef
- Koch, GG Intraclass correlation coefficient. In: Johnson, SKaNL eds. (1982) Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 213-217
- Lingard, EA, Sledge, CB, Learmonth, ID (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88: pp. 1201-1207 CrossRef
- Mahomed, NN, Liang, MH, Cook, EF, Daltroy, LH, Fortin, PR, Fossel, AH, Katz, JN (2002) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 29: pp. 1273-1279
- Mancuso, CA, Graziano, S, Briskie, LM, Peterson, MG, Pellicci, PM, Salvati, EA, Sculco, TP (2008) Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 466: pp. 424-431 CrossRef
- Mancuso, CA, Sculco, TP, Wickiewicz, TL, Jones, EC, Robbins, L, Warren, RF, Williams-Russo, P (2001) Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A: pp. 1005-1012
- Memtsoudis SG, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Besculides MC, Gaber L, Sculco TP. In-hospital Complications and Mortality of Unilateral, Bilateral, and Revision TKA: Based on an estimate of 4,159,661 Discharges. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2617–2627.
- Roos, EM, Lohmander, LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 1: pp. 64 CrossRef
- Roos, EM, Toksvig-Larsen, S (2003) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 1: pp. 17 CrossRef
- Saleh, KJ, Mulhall, KJ, Bershadsky, B, Ghomrawi, HM, White, LE, Buyea, CM, Krackow, KA (2005) Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87: pp. 1985-1994 CrossRef
- Uhlmann, RF, Inui, TS, Carter, WB (1984) Patient requests and expectations. Definitions and clinical applications. Med Care. 22: pp. 681-685 CrossRef
- Ware, JE, Gandek, B, Kosinski, M, Aaronson, NK, Apolone, G, Brazier, J, Bullinger, M, Kaasa, S, Leplege, A, Prieto, L, Sullivan, M, Thunedborg, K (1998) The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 51: pp. 1167-1170 CrossRef
- Ware, JE, Sherbourne, CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 30: pp. 473-483 CrossRef
- Ware JE, Jr.; Kosinski, M.; Gandek, B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: Qualitymetric Incorporated,1993, 2000, 2005.
- Wilson, NA, Schneller, ES, Montgomery, K, Bozic, KJ (2008) Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations. Health Aff (Millwood). 27: pp. 1587-1598 CrossRef
- How Often are Patient and Surgeon Recovery Expectations for Total Joint Arthroplasty Aligned? Results of a Pilot Study
Volume 7, Issue 3 , pp 229-234
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- total hip replacement
- total knee replacement
- preoperative expectations
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Health Policy Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- 4. Epidemiology and Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- 3. Department of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA