, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 219-222
Date: 30 Dec 2009

Revision Knee Arthroplasty Including Reconstruction of the Lateral Collateral Ligament by Allograft: A Case Report

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

A 53-year-old woman presented with an unstable and painful total knee arthroplasty 6 months after the index procedure. Disruption of both collateral ligaments as a young adult and the subsequent development of traumatic arthritis required repeated surgical and extensive conservative treatment before a prosthesis was implanted. Examination disclosed marked instability of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and loosening of the tibial and the femoral components. Review of the MRI obtained prior to the total knee replacement revealed discontinuity of the LCL with intense scarring of the posterolateral ligament complex. Definitive management of this twofold problem was not helped by literature review, which failed to reveal a gold standard or a broad consensus as a rationale for treatment. Consequently, an individual approach to the problem was defined: A one-stage revision arthroplasty was performed using a modular non-articulated constrained prosthesis and a bone–tendon–bone allograft to reconstruct the LCL in a one-stage operation. Postoperative rehabilitation included continuous passive motion, which was begun immediately after surgery and was gradually increased to 90° of flexion. The LCL reconstruction was initially protected in a hinged knee brace and weight-bearing was initially limited to toe-touch and gradually increased over 6 weeks. Pain-free motion to 0–115° flexion was achieved at 3 months after surgery and the patient had returned to her normal activities. The 4-year-follow-up displayed a stable and functional knee with no evidence of loosening or wear.

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the reporting of this case and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.