CT Evaluation of Total Hip Arthroplasty Complication: Dissociation of Acetabular Component
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The computed tomographic (CT) evaluation of patients with orthopedic implants has traditionally been limited due to considerable artifact from the prosthesis. With proper parameter modifications, however, the artifact can be diminished and diagnostic images can be produced. This is a report on the preoperative CT evaluation of a dislocated total hip replacement and dissociated acetabular component.
Two weeks prior to presentation, the patient had a noncemented total hip arthroplasty placed at an outside institution. The patient reported having an uneventful postoperative course, with acute nontraumatic onset of right hip pain.
Standard anteroposterior pelvic and right hip radiographs demonstrated complete dislocation of the right total hip prosthesis with, of note, complete dislodgment of the acetabular component (Fig. 1). Due to extreme pain, the patient was unable to move the leg significantly for a Lauestein lateral radiograph. CT examination was requested.
- Buckwalter KA, Parr JA, Choplin RH, Capello WN (2006) Multichannel CT imaging of orthopedic hardware and implants. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 10(1):86–97 CrossRef
- Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, Jung B, Heussen N, Flohr TG, Gunther RW, Schaller S (2003) A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 38(12):769–775 CrossRef
- Marx A, von Knoch M, Pfortner J, Wiese M, Saxler G (2006) Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip anthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126(7):487-492 CrossRef
- Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J (2006) Position of the acetabular cup: accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 58(2):294–300 CrossRef
- Blendea S, Eckman K, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ, Digioia AM 3rd (2005) Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Comput Aided Surg 10(1):37–43 CrossRef
- Wines AP, McNicol D (2006) Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(5):696–701 CrossRef
- Kwon YW, Powell KA, Yum JK, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP (2005) Use of three dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1):85–90 CrossRef
- Mueller LA, Kress A, Nowak T, Pfander D, Pitto RP, Forst R, Schmidt R (2006) Periacetabular bone changes after uncemented total hip arthroplasty evaluated by quantitative computed tomography. Acta Orthop 77(3):380–385 CrossRef
- Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A, Ehremann C, Nowak TE, Reulbach U, Forst R, Muller L (2005) Inter- and intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(5):291–297 CrossRef
- Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H (2006) Multidetector CT evaluation of bone substitutes remodeling after revision hip surgery. Clin Orthop 442:158–164 CrossRef
- Park JS, Ryu KN, Hong HP, Park YK, Chun YS, Yoo MC (2004) Focal osteolysis in total hip replacement: CT findings. Skeletal Radiol 33(11):632–640 CrossRef
- CT Evaluation of Total Hip Arthroplasty Complication: Dissociation of Acetabular Component
Volume 3, Issue 1 , pp 112-114
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links