Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Among Medicaid Patients in Wisconsin: Impacts on Healthcare Utilization and Costs

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unhealthy substance use in the USA results in significant mortality and morbidity. This study measured the effectiveness of paraprofessional-administered substance use screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) services on subsequent healthcare utilization and costs. The pre-post with comparison group study design used a population-based sample of Medicaid patients 18–64 years receiving healthcare services from 33 clinics in Wisconsin. Substance use screens were completed by 7367 Medicaid beneficiaries, who were compared to 6751 randomly selected treatment-as-usual Medicaid patients. Compared to unscreened patients, those screened changed their utilization over the 24-month follow-up period by 0.143 outpatient days per member per month (PMPM) (p < 0.001), −0.036 inpatient days PMPM (p < 0.05), −0.001 inpatient admissions PMPM (non-significant), and −0.004 emergency department days PMPM (non-significant). The best estimate of net annual savings is $391 per Medicaid adult beneficiary (2014 dollars). SBIRT was associated with significantly greater outpatient visits and significant reductions in inpatient days among working-age Medicaid beneficiaries in Wisconsin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACA:

Affordable Care Act

ASSIST:

Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test

ATE:

Average Treatment Effect

DiD:

Difference-in-differences

MA:

Medicaid

PMPM:

Per member per month

PSM:

Propensity Score Matching

SAMHSA:

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

SBIRT:

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment

USPSTF:

United States Prevention Services Task Force

WIPHL:

Wisconsin Initiative to Promote Healthy Lifestyles

References

  1. Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Sacks JJ, et al. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2011;41(5):516-524.

  2. Sacks JJ, Roeber J, Bouchery EE, et al. State costs of excessive alcohol consumption, 2006. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013;45(4):474-485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute; February 2013 2013.

  4. Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, et al. Behavioral Counseling Interventions in Primary Care to Reduce Risky/Harmful Alcohol Use by Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;140:557-568.

  5. Solberg LI, Maciosek MV, Edwards NM. Primary care intervention to reduce alcohol misuse ranking its health impact and cost effectiveness. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;34(2):143-152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleming MF, Mundt MP, French MT, et al. Benefit-Cost Analysis of Brief Physician Advice With Problem Drinkers in Primary Care Settings. Medical Care. 2000;38(1):7-18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Estee S, Wickizer T, He L, et al. Evaluation of the Washington state screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment project: cost outcomes for Medicaid patients screened in hospital emergency departments. Medical Care. 2010;48(1):18-24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bray JW, Zarkin GA, Davis KL, et al. The effect of screening and brief intervention for risky drinking on health care utilization in managed care organizations. Medical Care. 2007;45(2):177-182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cowell AJ, Bray JW, Mills MJ, et al. Conducting economic evaluations of screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: Methods and evidence to date for informing policy. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2010;29(6):623-630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeborn DK, Polen MR, Hollis JF, et al. Screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking in an HMO: effects on medical care utilization. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Res. 2000;27(4):446-453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McKnight-Eily LR, Liu Y, Brewer RD, et al. Vital Signs: Communication Between Health Professionals and Their Patients About Alcohol use—44 States and the District of Columbia, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2014;63(1):16-22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown RL, Moberg DP, Allen J, et al. A team approach to systematic behavioral screening and intervention. American Journal of Managed Care. 2014;20:e113-e121.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Altschuler J, Margolius D, Bodenheimer T, et al. Estimating a Reasonable Patient Panel Size for Primary Care Physicians With Team-Based Task Delegation. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2012;10(5):396-400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bodenheimer T, Laing BY. The Teamlet Model of Primary Care. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:457-461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Humeniuk R, Ali R. Validation of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Abuse Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and pilot brief intervention: a technical report of phase II findings of the WHO ASSIST Project. World Health Organization;2006.

  16. Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor T, et al. Validation of the Alcohol, Smoking And Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). Addiction. 2008;103(6):1039-1047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Data Book: Beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid - January 2016. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission and the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission; 2016.

  18. Saitz R, Cheng DM, Allensworth-Davies D, et al. The Ability of Single Screening Questions for Unhealthy Alcohol and Other Drug Use to Identify Substance Dependence in Primary Care. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2014;75:153-157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roy-Byrne P, Bumgardner K, Krupski A, et al. Brief intervention for problem drug use in safety-net primary care settings: A randomized clinical trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(5):492-501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Piper D. A Process Evaluation of Implementing WIPHL in Primary Care Clinics. Population Health Institute School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2010.

  21. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid Payments per Enrollee, FY2010. State Health Facts 2010; http://kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/medicaid-payments-per-enrollee/?state=WI. Accessed 19 June, 2014.

  22. S, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224-2260.

  23. Babor TF. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity—a summary of the second edition. Addiction. 2010;105:769-779.

  24. Grittner U, Kuntsche S, Graham K, et al. Social Inequalities and Gender Differences in the Experience of Alcohol-Related Problems. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2012;47(5):597-605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research team would like to thank the Wisconsin Department of Health Services Bureau of Prevention Treatment and Recovery Program Director, Joyce Allen, for her support in administering the SAMHSA grant. We also thank Dr. Daphne Duo, assistant scientist at the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, for her expertise and assistance in cleaning the datasets and constructing the analysis files.

Authors’ Contributions

Dr. Paltzer led the study, constructed the data set, conducted the analyses, and is responsible for the integrity of the data and the analysis. Dr. Brown and Dr. Moberg initiated the study concept and preliminary design, and all authors contributed to the ongoing development of the study. Dr. Paltzer, supported by Dr. Mullahy and Dr. Weimer, contributed in the analysis and interpretation. Dr. Paltzer drafted the manuscript. Dr. Paltzer, Dr. Brown, Dr. Mullahy, Dr. Moberg, Dr. Burns, and Dr. Weimer revised the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Paltzer PhD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Brown is CEO of Wellsys, a company helping healthcare settings deliver behavioral screening and intervention (BSI) services.

Funding and Support

SAMHSA Grant #5U79T1018309.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paltzer, J., Brown, R.L., Burns, M. et al. Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Among Medicaid Patients in Wisconsin: Impacts on Healthcare Utilization and Costs. J Behav Health Serv Res 44, 102–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-016-9510-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-016-9510-2

Keywords

Navigation