Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Relationship of State Medicaid Coverage to Medicaid Acceptance Among Substance Abuse Providers in the United States

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act will dramatically increase the number of Americans with Medicaid coverage for substance abuse treatment (SAT). Currently, few SAT providers accept Medicaid, and consequently, there is concern that newly-eligible Medicaid enrollees will have difficulty finding SAT providers willing to serve them. However, little is known about why few SAT providers accept Medicaid. In response, this study examines how features of state Medicaid coverage for SAT, including benefits, eligibility, and oversight, are associated with Medicaid acceptance among SAT providers. Medicaid acceptance was positively associated with the number of SAT services covered, and the number of optional categorical expansions implemented by the state. Requirements for physician involvement were associated with lower odds of acceptance. The results suggest that more generous Medicaid coverage may encourage SAT providers to accept Medicaid, but regulatory policies may inhibit their ability to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Congressional Budget Office. Updated Budget Projections: Fiscal Years 20132023. Washington: Congressional Budget Office; 2013.

  2. Congressional Budget Office. Estimates for the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act Updated for the Recent Supreme Court Decision. Washington: Congressional Budget Office; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buck JA. The looming expansion and transformation of public substance abuse treatment under the affordable care act. Health Affairs 2011;30: 1402-1410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donohue JM, Garfield RL, Lave, JR. The impact of expanded health insurance coverage on individuals with mental illnesses and substance use disorders. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Capoccia VA, Grazier KL, Toal C, et al. Massachusetts’s experience suggests coverage alone is insufficient to increase addiction disorders treatment. Health Affairs 2012;31(5): 1000-1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garfield RL, Lave JR, Donohue JM. Health reform and the scope of benefits for mental health and substance use disorder services. Psychiatric Services 2010; 61(11): 1081-1086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2010. Data on Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baker L, Royalty, AB. Medicaid policy, physician behavior, and health care for the low-income population. The Journal of Human Resources 1998;35(3): 480-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berman S, Dolins J, Tang SF, et al. Factors that influence the willingness of private primary care pediatricians to accept more Medicaid patients. Pediatrics, 2002;110: 239-248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson SM. Physician participation in Medicaid: background and issues. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and the Law 1982;6(4), 703-717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabel JR, Rice TH. Reducing public expenditures for physicians services: the price of paying less. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and the Law 1985;9: 595-609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadley J. Physician participation in Medicaid: evidence from California. Health Services Research 1979;4: 266-280.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell J. Physician participation in Medicaid revisited. Medical Care 1991;29(7): 645-653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perloff JD, Kletke PR, Neckerman KM. Recent trends in pediatrician participation in Medicaid. Medical Care 1986;24(8):749–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sloan F, Mitchell J, Cromwell J. Physician participation in state Medicaid programs. Journal of Human Resources 1978;13: 211-245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart M, Horgan C. Health services and financing of treatment. Alcohol Research & Health 2011;33: 389-394.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Medicaid: A Primer. Washington: Kaiser Family Foundation.

  19. Mark, TL, Levitt, KR, Vandivort-Warren, R, et al. Changes in US spending on mental health and substance abuse treatment, 1986–2005, and implications for policy. Health Affairs 2011;30(2): 284–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McElrath T, Chriqui JF, McBride DC. Factors related to Medicaid payment acceptance at outpatient substance abuse treatment programs. Health Services Research 2011;46(2): 632-653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fossett JW, Peterson JA. Physician supply and Medicaid participation. The causes of market failure. Medical Care 1989; 27(4): 386–396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fossett JW, Peterson JA, Ring MC. Public sector primary care and Medicaid: trading accessibility for mainstreaming. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1989;14(2): 309-325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greene J, Blustein J, Weitzman BC. Race, segregation, and physicians’ participation in Medicaid. Milbank Quarterly 2006;84(2): 239-272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. D’Aunno T. The role of organization and management in substance abuse treatment: review and roadmap. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2006;31(3): 221-233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mark TL, Levit KR, Vandivort-Warren R, et al. Trends in spending for substance abuse treatment, 1986–2003. Health Affairs 2007;26(4): 1118-1128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McLellan AT, Carise D, Kleber HD. Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public’s demand for quality care? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2003;25(2): 117-121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mulvey KP, Hubbard S, Hayashi S. A national study of the substance abuse treatment workforce. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2003;24(1): 51-57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robinson G, Kaye N, Bergman D, et al. State Profiles of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Medicaid. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2005). Results from the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-28, DHHS Publication No. SMA 05-4062). Rockville

  30. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000, Summary File 1. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov, 2000.

  31. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2003. Data on Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities. Rockville, 2004.

  32. Zuckerman S, McFeeters J, Cunningham P, et al. Changes in Medicaid physician fees, 1998–2003: implications for physician participation. Health Affairs 2004;W4: 374-384.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley, 1987.

  35. Schaefer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Harel O. The estimation of R2 and adjusted R2 in incomplete data sets using multiple imputation. Journal of Applied Statistics 2009;36(10): 1109-1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Grogan CM, Patashnik E. Between welfare medicine and mainstream entitlement: Medicaid at the political crossroads. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003;28(5): 821-858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Deck DD, McFarland BH, Titus JM, et al. (2000). Access to substance abuse treatment services under the Oregon health plan. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000;284(16): 2093-2099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McCarty D, & Argeriou M. (2003). The Iowa managed substance abuse care plan: access, utilization, and expenditures for Medicaid recipients. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 2003;30(1): 18-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Callahan JJ, Shepard DS, Beinecke RH., et al. Mental health/substance abuse treatment in managed care: the Massachusetts Medicaid experience. Health Affairs 1995;14(3): 173-184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ettner S, Denmead G, Dilonardo J, et al. The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland’s health choice program. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 2003;30(1): 41-62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hodgkin D., Shepard D, Anthony, Y., et al. A publicly managed Medicaid substance abuse carve-out: effects on spending and utilization. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2004;31(3): 197-217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina M. Andrews PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, C.M. The Relationship of State Medicaid Coverage to Medicaid Acceptance Among Substance Abuse Providers in the United States. J Behav Health Serv Res 41, 460–472 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-013-9387-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-013-9387-2

Keywords

Navigation