Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consumer Perceptions of Integrated Trauma-Informed Services Among Women with Co-Occurring Disorders

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of a national, multi-site treatment outcome study, an instrument was designed to assess consumers’ perceptions of key services integrating trauma, mental health, and substance abuse issues, the Consumer Perceptions of Care (CPC). This study evaluates the psychometric properties of this instrument and analyzes consumers’ perceptions of the services they received. The results suggest that the measure has four factors: services integration, choice in services, trauma-informed assessment, and respect for cultural identity. These factors demonstrated adequate reliability, and the overall results suggested that the measure is a reliable, sensitive, and valid reflection of consumers’ perceptions of their services and their providers for diverse racial and ethnic groups. Women in the intervention programs perceived their services as more highly integrated for trauma, mental health, and substance use than women in the services as usual or comparison programs, supporting its utility as a measure of programs designed to provide integrated services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris M. Treating sexual abuse trauma with dually diagnosed women. Community Mental Health Journal. 1996;32:371–385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carey KB. Treatment of co-occurring substance abuse and major mental illness. In: Drake RE, Mueser KT, eds. New Directions for Mental Health Services No. 70. Dual diagnosis of major mental illness and substance abuse. Volume 2: Recent research of clinical implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996:19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander MJ, Muenzenmaier K. Trauma, addiction, and recovery: addressing public health epidemics among women with severe mental illness. In: Levin BL, Blanch AK, Jennings A, eds. Women’s Mental Health Services: A Public Health Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Najavits LM. Seeking Safety: A Treatment Manual for PTSD and Substance Abuse. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harris M. Trauma Recovery and Empowerment: A Clinician’s Guide for Working with Women in Groups. New York: The Free Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sciacca K. An integrated treatment approach for severely mentally ill individuals with substance disorders. In: Minkoff K, Drake RE, eds. New Directions for Mental Health Services No. 50. Dual diagnosis of major mental illness and substance abuse. New York: Jossey-Bass; 1991:69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Minkoff K. Best practices: developing standards of care for individuals with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:597–599.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire: psychometric properties and psychotherapy outcome. Evaluation & Program Planning. 1982;5:233–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC, Stegner BL. Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation & Program Planning. 1983;6(3–4):299–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pekarik G, Wolff C. Relationship of satisfaction to symptom change, follow-up adjustment, and clinical significance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1996;27(2):202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Larsen D, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves W, et al. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1979;2:197–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerber GJ, Prince PN. Measuring client satisfaction with assertive community treatment. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50:546–550.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Macnee C, McCabe S. Satisfaction with care among homeless patients: development and testing of a measure. Journal of Community Health Nursing. 2004;21(3):167–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Calsyn RJ, Morse GA, Yonker RD, et al. Client choice of treatment and client outcomes. Journal of Community Psychology. 2003;31:339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Segal SP, Redman D, Silverman C. Measuring clients’ satisfaction with self-help agencies. Psychiatric Services. 2000;51:1148–1152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasprow WJ, Frisman L, Rosenheck RA. Homeless veterans’ satisfaction with residential treatment. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50:540–545.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fontana A, Rosenheck R, Ruzek J, et al. Specificity of patients’ satisfaction with the delivery and outcome of treatment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2006;194(10):780–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berghofer G, Lang A, Henkel H, et al. Satisfaction of inpatients and outpatients with staff, environment, and other patients. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:104–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Calsyn RJ, Morse GA, Klinkenberg WD, et al. Moderators and mediators of client satisfaction in case management programs for clients with severe mental illness. Mental Health Services Research. 2002;4:267–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cruz M, Pincus HA. Reserach on the influence that communication in psychiatric encounters has on treatment. Psychiatric Services. 2002;53:1253–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tunner TP, Salzer MS. Consumer perspectives on quality of care in the treatment of schizophrenia. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2006;33:674–681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bellack AS. Scientific and consumer models of recovery in schizophrenia: Concordance, contrasts, and implications. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2006;32(3):432–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bollerud K. A model for the treatment of trauma-related syndromes among chemically dependent inpatient women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1990;7:83–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Carmen E, Rieker P. A psychosocial model of the victim-to-patient process. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1989;12(2):431–443.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grella CE. Background and overview of mental health and substance abuse treatment systems: meeting the needs of women who are pregnant or parenting. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1996;28(4):319–343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boardman AP, Hodgson R, Lewis M, et al. North Staffordshire Community Beds Study: longitudinal evaluation of psychiatric in-patients units attached to community mental health centres. I: methods, outcome and patient satisfaction. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;175:70–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsemberis S, Rogers ES, Rodis E, et al. Housing satisfaction for persons with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Community Psychology. 2003;31:581–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holcomb WR, Parker JC, Leong GB, et al. Customer satisfaction and self-reported treatment outcomes among psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatric Services. 1998;49:929–934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Comtois KA, Russo J, Snowden M, et al. Factors associated with high use of public mental health services by persons with borderline personality disorder. Psychiatric Services. 2003;54(8):1149–1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson-Zlupko L, Dore MM, Kauffman E, et al. Women in recovery: their perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1996;13(1):51–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Conners NA, Franklin KK. Using focus groups to evaluate client satisfaction in an alcohol and drug treatment program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;18(4):313–320.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith BD, Marsh JC. Client-service matching in substance abuse treatment for women with children. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2002;22(3):161–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pascoe GC. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1983;6:185–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Garroutte EM, Kunovich RM, Jacobsen C, et al. Patient satisfaction and ethnic identity among American Indian older adults. Social Science & Medicine. 2004;59:2233–2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paris M, Añez LM, Bedregal LE, et al. Help seeking and satisfaction among latinas: the roles of setting, ethnic identity, and therapeutic alliance. Journal of Community Psychology. 2005;33(3):299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eisen SV, Gerena M, Ranganathan G, et al. Reliability and validity of the BASIS-24 mental health survey for Whites, African-Americans, and Latinos. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2006;33(3):304–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Giard J, Hennigan K, Huntington N, et al. Development and implementation of a multisite evaluation for the Women, Co-Occurring Disorders and Violence Study. Journal of Community Psychology. 2005;33:411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Veysey B, Clark C. Responding to Physical and Sexual Abuse in Women With Alcohol and Other Drug and Mental Disorders: Program Building. New York, NY: The Haworth Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morrissey JP, Ellis A, Gatz M, et al. Outcomes for women with co-occurring disorders and trauma: program and person-level effects. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28:121–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huntington N, Moses DJ, Veysey BM. Developing and implementing a comprehensive approach to serving women with co-occurring disorders and histories of trauma. Journal of Community Psychology. 2005;33:395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Horvath AO, Greenberg L. The development of the Working Alliance Inventory. In: Greenberg LS, Pinsof WM, eds. The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook. New York: The Guilford Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1987;36:223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Solomon P, Draine J, Delaney M. The working alliance and consumer case management. Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1995;221:126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hayes WL. Statistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Winer BJ. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pellegrin KL, Stuart GW, Maree B, et al. A brief scale for assessing patients’ satisfaction with care in outpatient psychiatric services. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:816–819.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sabourin S, Laferriere N, Sicuro F, et al. Social desirability, psychological distress, and consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1989;36(3):352–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Clark C, Becker M, Giard J, et al. The role of coercion in the treatment of women with co-occurring disorders and histories of abuse. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2005;32:167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded under Guidance for Applicants (GFA) no. TI 00-003 entitled Cooperative Agreement to Study Women with Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health (ADM) Disorders who Have Histories of Violence: Phase II from the Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s three centers: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Center for Mental Health Services and Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (March 2000).

The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Wendy Vogel and Laura Morris of Policy Research Associates, Inc., for assistance in the analysis, Luz Lopez, Paula Bjelajac, and Karen Lowe for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, the steering committee of the Women and Violence Study—especially the evaluation subcommittee and the consumers/survivors/recovering persons—for their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen Clark PhD.

Appendix

Appendix

Consumer perceptions of care measure

Table 8  

In this section, I am going to read some statements which describe different experiences and reactions women may have to the substance abuse, mental health, sexual abuse or domestic violence services that they receive. Using the scale on this card [Hand Response Scale], please tell me how much you agree or disagree with each statement, as it relates to your own service experiences, during the past three months.

SAY TO RESPONDENT: Also, in some of these statements I will be using the words ‘trauma’ and ‘service provider’. When I use the word ‘trauma’, I am referring to any physical or sexual abuse you may have experienced at any point in your life. When I say ‘service provider’, I am referring to the person delivering services, NOT myself.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, C., Young, M.S., Jackson, E. et al. Consumer Perceptions of Integrated Trauma-Informed Services Among Women with Co-Occurring Disorders. J Behav Health Serv Res 35, 71–90 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-007-9076-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-007-9076-0

Keywords

Navigation