Abstract
This article examines the degree to which various demographic characteristics, personality traits, and environmental factors are associated with overall emotional well-being of 125 adolescent girls whose mothers were involved in welfare reform. Daughters participated in a 4-year, mixed method study and annually completed a structured interview protocol and a sub-group also completed a qualitative interview. The quantitative findings from the study suggest that daughters having an internal locus of control, experiencing fewer negative life events, and reporting stronger parental and teacher social support had enhanced emotional well-being over the 4-year study compared to daughters without these factors. The findings were further elaborated with examples from qualitative interviews conducted with the daughters. The findings were used to propose prevention activities using a tertiary mental health preventive intervention framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104–193, 110 Stat. 2105.
Children Now. Content analysis on welfare reform reporting. Available at: http://www.childrennow.org/economics/welfref98/welfarereformshortdoc.html. Accessed June 17, 2003.
Gennetian LA, Duncan GJ, Knox VW, et al. How Welfare and Work Policies for Parents Affect Adolescents: A Synthesis of Research. New York: Manpower Development Research Corporation; 2002.
Taylor MH. The potential impact of gender roles socialization on welfare policy formation. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 2000;27:135–152.
Brooks MG, Buckner JC. Work history and welfare: job histories, barriers to employment, and predictors of work among low-income single mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1996;66:526–537.
Furstenberg F. The next generation: the children of teenage mothers grow up. In: Rosenbaum M, Testa M, eds. Early Parenthood and Coming of Age in the 1990s. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1992:113–135.
Gottschalk P, McLanahan S, Sandefur G. The dynamics and intergenerational transmission of poverty and welfare participation. In: Danziger SH, Sandefour GD, Weinberg DH, eds. Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994:85–108.
Boothroyd RA, Olufokunbi D. Leaving the welfare rolls: the health and mental health status of current and former welfare recipients. Mental Health Service Research. 2001;3:119–128.
Boushey H, Gundersen B. When working just isn’t enough: measuring the hardships faced by families after moving from welfare to work. Available at: http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/briefingpapers_hardships. Accessed April 5, 2002.
Lichter DT, Crowley MC. Poverty in American: beyond welfare reform. Population Bulletin. 2000;57:1–36.
Kirby D. No Easy Answers: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, Task Force on Effective Programs and Research; 1997.
Fraser MW, ed. Risk and Resilience in Childhood: An Ecological Perspective. Washington, DC: NASW Press; 1997.
Egeland B, Carlson E, Sruofe LA. Resilience as process. Development and Psychopathology. 1993;5:517–528.
Smith C, Carlson BE. Stress, coping and resilience in children and youth. Social Service Review. 1997;71:231–256.
Masten AS, Morison P, Pellegrini D, et al. Competence under stress: risk and protective factors. In: Weintraub S, ed. Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:236–256.
Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In: Weintraub S, ed. Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:181–214.
Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development. 2000;72:543–562.
Rankin BH, Quane JM. Social contexts and urban adolescent outcomes: The interrelated effects of neighborhoods, families, and peers on African-American youth. Social Problems. 2002;49:79–100.
McCabe KM, Barnett D. The relation between familial factors and the future orientation of urban, African American sixth graders. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2000;9:491–508.
Jodl KM, Michael A, Oksana M, et al. Parents’ role in shaping early adolescents’ occupational aspirations. Child Development. 2001;72:1247–1265.
Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RH, eds. Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research/Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, Division of Biobehavioral Sciences and Mental Disorders, Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences; 1994.
Leginski WA, Croze C, Driggers J, et al. Data Standards for Mental Health Decision Support Systems. (ADM89-1589). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1989.
Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group. Multidimensional measurement of religiousness, spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute; 2003 (1999).
Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy. 1983;9:171–180.
Kabacoff RI, Miller IW, Bishop DS, et al. A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric, medical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Family Psychology. 1990;3:431–439.
Miller IW, Epstein NB, Bishop DS, et al. The McMaster Family Assessment Device: reliability and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1985;1:345–356.
Byles J, Byrne C, Boyle MH, et al. Ontario Child Health Study: reliability and validity of the General Functioning Subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process. 1988;27:97–104.
Norwicki S Jr, Strickland BR. Study presents reliability and validity evidence concerning measure of locus of control for children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1973;40:148–154.
Smith VK. Analysis of Locus of Control and Educational Level Utilizing the Internal Control Index. Master’s Thesis, Marshall University; 2003.
Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1965.
Blascovich J, Tomaka J. Measures of self-esteem. In: Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS, eds. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Third edition. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research; 1993:115–160.
McCarthy JD, Hoge DR. Analysis of age effects in longitudinal studies of adolescent self-esteem. Developmental Psychology. 1982;18:372–279.
Shahani C, Dipboye RL, Phillips AP. Global self-esteem as a correlate of work-related attitudes: a question of dimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1990;54:276–288.
Silbert E, Tippett JS. Self-esteem: clinical assessment and measurement validation. Psychological Reports. 1965;16:1017–1071.
Monaghan JJ, Robinson JO, Dodge JA. The children’s life events inventory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1979;23:3–68.
Harter S. Manual for the Social Support Scale for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver; 1985.
Varni JW, Katz ER. Stress, social support, and negative affectivity in children with newly diagnosed cancer: a prospective transactional analysis. Psychooncology. 1997;6:267–278.
Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401.
Jellinek MS, Murphy JM, Burns BJ. Brief psychosocial screening in outpatient pediatric practice. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1986;109:371–378.
Shern DL, Wilson NZ, Coen AS, et al. Client outcomes II: longitudinal client data from the Colorado Treatment Outcome Study. The Milbank Quarterly. 1994;72:123–148.
Hann D, Winter K, Jacobsen P. Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients. Evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1999;46:437–443.
Hertzog C, Van Alstine J, Usala P, et al. Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in older populations. Psychological Assessment. 1990;2:64–72.
Knight RG, Williams S, McGee R, et al. Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a sample of women in middle life. Behavior Research and Therapy. 1997;35:373–380.
Nguyen HT, Kitner-Triolo M, Evans MK, et al. Factorial invariance of the CES-D in low socioeconomic status African Americans compared with a nationally representative sample. Psychiatry Research. 2004;126:177–187.
Weissman MM, Sholamskas D, Pottenger M, et al. Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1977;106:203–214.
Jellinek M, Murphy JM, Robinson J, et al. The pediatric symptom checklist: screening school-aged children for psychosocial dysfunction. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1988;112:201–209.
Murphy JM, Jellinek MS, Milinsky S. The Pediatric Symptom Checklist: validation in real world middle school. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 1989;14:629–639.
Murphy JM, Reede J, Jellinek MS, et al. Screening for psychosocial dysfunction in inner-city children: further validation of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry. 1992;31:1105–1111.
Jellinek MS, Murphy JM. The recognition of psychosocial disorders in pediatric office practice: the current status of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 1990;11:273–278.
Jellinek MS, Murphy JM, Burns BJ. Brief psychosocial screening in outpatient pediatric practice. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1986;109:371–378.
Jellinek MS, Murphy JM, Little M, et al. Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist to screen for psychosocial problems in pediatric primary care. Archive of Adolescent Medicine. 1999;153:254–260.
Boothroyd RA, Gomez MI, Armstrong MI, et al. Young and poor: the well-being of adolescent girls living in families receiving temporary assistance for needy families program. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2005;14:141–154.
Davis M. Addressing the needs of youth in transition to adulthood. Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2003;30:495–509.
Wagner M, Davis M. How are we preparing students with emotional disturbances for the transition to young adulthood? Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2006;14:86–98.
Quinn J. Where need meets opportunity: youth development programs for early teens. The Future of Children. 1999;9:96–116.
Jekielek MA, Moore KA, Hair EC. Mentoring Programs and Youth Development: A Synthesis. Washington, DC: Child Trends; 2002.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals. 2002;32:509–515.
Miranda J, Green BL. The need for mental health services research focusing on poor young women. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics. 1999;2:73–80.
Corrigan PW, Penn DL. Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. American Psychologist. 1999;54:765–776.
The President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Rockville MD: DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832; 2003.
Randolph W, Viswanath K. Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: marketing health in a crowded media world. Annual Review of Public Health. 2004;25:419–437.
Marian H, Potter LD, Wong FL, et al. Effects of a mass media campaign to increase physical activity among children: year-1 results of the VERB campaign. Pediatrics 2005;116:e277–e284. URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2005-0043.
Center for Mental Health Services. Caring for Every Child’s Mental Health Campaign. Available at: http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/child/. Accessed October 6, 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armstrong, M.I., Boothroyd, R.A. Predictors of Emotional Well-Being in At-Risk Adolescent Girls: Developing Preventive Intervention Strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res 35, 435–453 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-006-9048-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-006-9048-9