Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Co-located single display collaborative learning for early childhood education

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The benefits of collaborative learning are well documented. However, most of the research has been done with children beyond the ages of early childhood. This could be due to the common and erroneous belief that young children have not developed the capacity to work collaboratively toward a given aim. In this paper we show how small group co-located collaborative learning on a single display computer improves oral language, logical-mathematical and social skills in pre-school children. Considering that early childhood teachers have a responsibility to provide a supportive environment, teacher mediation is essential in order to achieve collaborative learning. Thus, teachers were trained in the use of the technology and strategies for effective collaborative learning. The study was implemented in 10 kindergarten classrooms with 268 children between the ages of 5 and 6 years old. A group of 5 kindergarten classrooms with equivalent characteristics participated as a comparison group. During the four-month intervention, children worked on collaborative activities at least twice a week. A quasi-experimental approach was used to assess the implementation, including pre- and post-testing. The data showed differences in the learning of oral language, logical-mathematical and social skills, with the experimental group demonstrating significantly greater achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astington, J. W., & Pelletier, J. (2005). Theory of mind, language, and learning in the early years: Developmental origins of school readiness. In B. D. Homer & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), The development of social cognition and communication (pp. 205–230). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battistich, V., & Watson, M. (2003). Fostering social development in preschool and the early elementary grades through co-operative classroom activities. In R. M. Gillies & A. F. Ashman (Eds.), Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. London; New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellei, C., Valenzuela, J. P., & Sevilla, A. (2009). Working conditions and teachers’ status in a market oriented educational system. The case of Chile. In 10th UKFIET International Conference on Education and Development: Politics, Policies and Progress. Oxford, UK.

  • Bricker, L. J., Tanimoto, S. L., Rothenberg, A. I., Hutama, D. C., & Wong, T. H. (1995) Multiplayer activities that develop mathematical coordination. In The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 32–39). Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.

  • Broadhurst, K., Paton, H., & May-Chahal, C. (2005). Children missing from school systems: Exploring divergent patterns of disengagement in the narrative accounts of parents, carers, children and young people. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(1), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T., Moll, H., Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., Liszkowski, U., Behne, T., et al. (2011). Early social cognition in three cultural contexts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(2), 1–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale, J. I. M., & Lewis, C. (2006). How children develop social understanding. In Understanding children’s worlds. Malden, MA: Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, R. (2002). Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and activities. In Early childhood education series. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., & Neuman, S. B. (2006). Cognitive and linguistic building blocks of early literacy. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. In European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (Ed.), Advances in learning and instruction series. Amsterdam; New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem-solving ability. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(Pt 2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(Pt 2), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1998). Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 746–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, M., & Adams, D. (2002). Collaborative inquiry: Working toward shared goals. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38(3), 115–118. Article.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infante, C., Hidalgo, P., Nussbaum, M., Alarcón, R., & Gottlieb, A. (2009). Multiple mice based collaborative one-to-one learning. Computers in Education, 53(2), 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infante, C., Weitz, J., Reyes, T., Nussbaum, M., Gomez, F., & Radovic, D. (2010). Co-located collaborative learning video game with single display groupware. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(2), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers in Education, 49(4), 1037–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

  • Kaplan, F., Do Lenh, S., Bachour, K., Yi-ing Kao, G., Gault, C., & Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Interpersonal computers for higher education. In P. Dillenbourg, J. Huang, & M. Cherubini (Eds.), Interactive artifacts and furniture supporting collaborative work and learning, computer-supported collaborative learning series; 10. Boston, MA: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2002). Pupil groupings in primary school classrooms: Sites for learning and social pedagogy? British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara-Cinisomo, S., Pebley, A. R., Vaiana, M. E., & Maggio, E. (2004). Are L.A.’s children ready for school? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, S. (2006). Collaborative group work and individual development of metacognition in the early years. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Cscw’90 (pp. 357–370). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/99332.99367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, K., Stephens, E., Callaway, R., Letendre, C., & Kimbell-Lopez, K. (2002). Adoption of information communication technology by teacher educators: One-on-one coaching. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 11(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MINEDUC, M. de E. de C. (2005). Bases Curriculares de la Educación Parvularia. Ministerio de Educación de Chile, Santiago de Chile.

  • Nussbaum, M., Gomez, F., Mena, J., Alexander, P. A., Torres, A., Singer, M., et al. (2010). Technology-Supported Face-to-Face Small Group Collaborative Formative Assessment and its Integration in the Classroom. Innovations in Educational Psychology: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Human Development (pp. 295–323). New York: Springer.

  • Nussbaum, M., Dillenbourg, P., Fischer, F., Looi, C., & Roschelle, J. (2011). How to Integrate CSCL in Classroom Life: Orchestration. The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2011 (Vol. 3, p. 1199). Presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference, Hong-Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).

  • Paek, T., Agrawala, M., Basu, S., Drucker, S., Kristjansson, T., Logan, R., et al. (2004). Toward universal mobile interaction for shared displays. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 266–269). Chicago: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawar, U. S., Pal, J., Gupta, R., & Toyama, K. (2007). Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors In Computing Systems (pp. 1581–1590). San Jose: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Yazejian, N., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., et al. (1999). The children of the cost, quality, and outcomes study go to school: Executive Summary. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved from http://fpg.unc.edu/sites/default/files/resources/reports-and-policy-briefs/NCEDL_CQO_executive_summary.pdf.

  • Pelgrum, W. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers in Education, 37(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, M., Wilton, K., & Townsend, M. (2002). Promoting the social acceptance of young children with moderate-severe intellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniques. American journal of mental retardation: AJMR, 107(5), 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, F. P. (2001). Human development: A life-span approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C. G., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M., & Lee, Y.-S. (2007). A national portrait of chronic absenteeism in the early grades. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Patton, C., & Tatar, D. (2007). Designing networked handheld devices to enhance school learning. In Advances in computers (Vol. 70, pp. 1–60). SAN DIEGO: Elsevier Science & Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., Mandryk, R., & Inkpen, K. (2003). Understanding children’s collaborative interactions in shared environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevahn, L., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Oberle, K., & Wahl, L. (2000). Effects of conflict resolution training integrated into a kindergarten curriculum. Child Development, 71(3), 772–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J., Bederson, B. B., & Druin, A. (1999). Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI is The Limit, Chi’99 (pp. 286–293). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/302979.303064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szewkis, E., Nussbaum, M., Denard, F., Abalos, J., Rosen, T., Caballero, D., et al. (2011). Collaboration within large groups in the classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., et al. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, E., & Greenberg, S. (2004). Rapidly prototyping Single Display Groupware through the SDGToolkit. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Australasian User Interface—Volume 28, AUIC’04 (pp. 101–110). Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.

  • Tunnard, S., & Sharp, J. (2009). Children’s views of collaborative learning. Education, 37(2), 159–164. doi:10.1080/03004270802095421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasileiadou, M. (2009). Cooperative learning and its effects on pre-primary, marginalized children. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 14(4), 337–347. doi:10.1080/13632750903303179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermette, P., Harper, L., & DiMillo, S. (2004). Cooperative & collaborative learning…with 4–8 year olds: How does research support Teachers’ practice? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(2), 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Chan, A., De, T., Freund, D., et al. (2008). The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 360–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagal, J., Rick, J., & Hsi, I. (2006). Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, M., Solomon, A., & Frye, D. (2008). Young children’s recognition of the intentionality of teaching. Child Development, 79(5), 1237–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers in Education, 42(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Salinas, R. (2005). Dynamic grouping in collaborative learning supported by wireless handhelds. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was partially funded by Microsoft Research, the Center for Research on Educational Policy and Practice Grant CIE01-CONICYT, and a grant from the Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Computer Science Department, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna, 4860, Santiago, Chile

    Miguel Nussbaum, Juan F. Weitz, Ximena Lopez, Javiera Mena & Alex Torres

  2. School of Education, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna, 4860, Santiago, Chile

    Florencia Gómez

Authors
  1. Florencia Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Nussbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan F. Weitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ximena Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Javiera Mena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alex Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florencia Gómez.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Example 1:

Sample items of Oral Language and Logical-Mathematical Relationships and Quantification Test.

Item information (curricular area, specific content, and descriptor) was taken from the national curriculum for kindergarten (MINEDUC, 2005). Item images are presented in students’ first language—Spanish.

Curricular area: Communication

Specific content: Oral Language

Descriptor: Children recognize words that correspond to their immediate surroundings.

Directions:

Paint the element that corresponds to the word.

figure a

Example 2:

Curricular area: Relations with natural and cultural environment

Specific content: Logical mathematical relationships and quantification

Descriptor: Sort at least six elements according to different criteria.

Directions:

Circle the series that is sorted in descending order.

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez, F., Nussbaum, M., Weitz, J.F. et al. Co-located single display collaborative learning for early childhood education. Computer Supported Learning 8, 225–244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9168-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9168-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation