Baek, J. Y., Hjalmarson, M. A., & Banna-Ritland, B. (2008). Design research on a diet: A methodological framework called design assessment. New York: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers’ Association.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(3), 321–327.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2
Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M. H., Stock, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51
Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289–298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13
Fidel, R., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2004). From information behaviour research to the design of information systems: The cognitive work analysis framework. Information Research
(1), paper 210. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/10-1/paper210.html
Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13
Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Reinhart and Winston.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge.
MacKinnon, K. (2006). Identification of
Knowledge Forum® using handheld
context. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Institute for Knowledge, Innovation and Technology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
MacKinnon K (2008) A human-tech perspective on technology infusion in the context of teacher education. In C. Brett (Chair), Principled use
commonalities? Paper symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
MacKinnon, K. & Woodruff, E. (2008a). Examining the
education program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Institute for Knowledge, Innovation and Technology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
MacKinnon, K. & Woodruff, E. (2008b). Examining the
a two-year, research-based pre-service program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers’ Association, New York, NY.
MacKinnon, K. & Woodruff, E. (2008c). Understanding the
work analysis. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 217–228), Hawaii: HICE 2008.
Naikar, N., Hopcroft, R., & Moylan, A. (2005). Work domain analysis: Theoretical concepts and methodology [Report No. DSTO-TR-1665]. Edinburgh: DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory.
Nirula, L. (2008). Designing constraint informed handheld-supported literacy innovations for struggling readers. Toronto: Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Toronto.
Nirula, L., & Woodruff, E. (2008). Innovations using
readers. Proceedings of
on Education (pp. 6321–6333), Hawaii: HICE 2008.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Reichardt, C. S. & Cook, T. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.) Qualitative and
research (SAGE Research Progress Series, Vol. 1, pp. 7–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (1999). Predictors of teachers’ confidence in their ability to implement computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21
Rowley, J., Dysard, G., & Arnold, J. (2005). Developing a new technology infusion program for preparing tomorrow’s teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 105–123.
Vicente, K. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vicente, K. (2003). The human factor: Revolutionizing the way people live with technology. New York: Routledge.
Woodruff, E. & Nirula, L. (2005). Design research in the elementary school classroom. In: C. Howard, J. Boettcher, L. Justice and K. Schenk (Eds.) Encyclopedia of
and technology (Vol. II, pp. 510–517). Information Science Publishing.