Abstract
Social network sites such as Facebook are often conceived of as purely social spaces; however, as these sites have evolved, so have the ways in which students are using them. In this study, we examine how undergraduate students use the social network site Facebook to engage in classroom-related collaborative activities (e.g., arranging study groups, learning about course processes) to show how Facebook may be used as an informal tool that students use to organize their classroom experiences, and explore the factors that predict type of use. Data from two surveys (N = 302, N = 214) are used to analyze how Facebook use, social and psychological factors, self-efficacy, and types of instructor-student communication on Facebook are related to positive and negative collaboration among students. We found that predictors of Facebook use for class organizing behaviors include self-efficacy and perceived motivation to communicate with others using the site. When placed in the context of social and psychological factors, Facebook intensity did not predict either positive or negative collaboration, suggesting that how students used the site, rather than how often they used the tool or how important they felt it was, affected their propensity to collaborate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, M. S. (Ed.). (2002). The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. New York: ACM.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychology Review, 84, 191–215.
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1–44.
Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1909–1912). New York: ACM
Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25–41.
DiMicco, J., Geyer, W., Millen, D., Dugan, C., & Brownholtz, B. (2009). People sensemaking and relationship building on an enterprise social network site. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (in press). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009a). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 119–140.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009b). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1130–1161.
Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 85–93). New York: ACM
Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 93–104.
Hamilton, A. (2009). What Facebook users share: Lower grades. Time Magazine, April 14
Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at the CSCW '06, Banff, Alberta, Canada. November
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1027–1036). New York: ACM
Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 721–730). ACM: New York
Lang, K. J. (2009, November 19). Facebook friend turns into Big Brother. LaCrosse Tribune. Retrieved July 13, 2010 from http://lacrossetribune.com/news/local/article_0ff40f7a-d4d1-11de-afb3-001cc4c002e0.html
Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: “It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 141–155.
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56, 1–17.
McCabe, D. (2007). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry, 62(3), 365–374.
O’Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S. K., & Lippert, L. R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 464–490.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2), 139–178.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398–427.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2, 1–28.
Pasek, J., More, E., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Facebook and academic performance: Reconciling a media sensation with data. First Monday, 14(5)
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Rev. ed.). Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Salaway, G., Caruso, J. B., & Nelson, M. R. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008. Boulder: Educause Center for Applied Research.
Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 157–174.
Smith, S. D., Salaway, G., & Caruso, J. B. (2009). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2009. Boulder: Educause Center for Applied Research.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge: MIT.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434–445.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tomai, M., Rosa, V., Mebane, M. E., D’Acunti, A., Benedetti, M., & Francescato, D. (2010). Virtual communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high schools students. Computers & Education, 54, 265–274.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lampe, C., Wohn, D.Y., Vitak, J. et al. Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. Computer Supported Learning 6, 329–347 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9115-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9115-y