Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Balanced Nation: Islam and the Challenges of Extremism, Fundamentalism, Islamism and Jihadism

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As will be made clear below, the terms extremism, fundamentalism, Islamism and Jihadism are often used interchangeably by the public, something that has negative implications for both the integration of the Muslim community into Western society, and the efficacy of counter-extremism efforts. This paper aims to provide working for these terms by understanding them independent from their misinformed socio-political contexts, and by determining how they relate to one another in what will be identified as a series of conceptual subsets (See Fig. 1). In doing so, this paper will attempt to provide a framework for the usage of these terms in the governmental, academic, and public contexts, while removing some of the noise surrounding the important, and often highly sensitive contexts within which these terms are referenced. In this paper, religious extremism will defined as an ideological prerequisite to fundamentalism, Islamism and jihadism. It is a rejectionist, and dogmatic orientation that neglects balance in all elements of an individual’s ideological outlook. However, a fundamentalist, when defined in terms of faith, seeks to legitimise his or her beliefs through a non-contextual analysis of the relevant religious texts. An Islamist seeks to implement his or her fundamentalist views (that are by necessity, extremist) with a view to altering the structures of governance in accordance with the aforementioned rejectionist traits. Finally, and in relatively simple terms, a jihadist is an individual that champions the violent, global imposition of the Islamists’ beliefs. Jihadism is a subset of Islamism, Islamism is a subset of fundamentalism, and fundamentalism is a subset of extremism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=globalisation

  2. Indeed, for many extremist Muslims in the West, there is a sort of phobic reaction towards modernity and its technology, especially when these are made manifest in entertainment, something that, in the Islamic extremist’s skewed worldview, is opposed to a life of worship. Cf. Hasan (2012)

  3. For a close study of the role identity has in the so-called radicalisation process, see (Al-Raffie 2013).

  4. For a comprehensive history of Protestant fundamentalism in North America, see (Marsden 2006).

  5. For more on secularisation theory, see (Weber 1946).

  6. However, it is worth noting that, in an Islamic context, usūlī also refers to a rigorous foundational approach in theology and jurisprudence. In that sense, it sometimes appears in a positive context.

  7. On apostasy and blasphemy laws, see (Hasan 2013).

  8. Fascism is an example of this: a non-religious extremist ideology with many parallels to religious extremism, characterised by a glorification of force and xenophobic hatred of an out-group, but one whose totalitarianism is not religious, in as much as it does not revolve around worship of a deity – although an existing leader often embodies this role.

  9. For an example of this circular defamation, it is worth glancing at Berman et al. (2010).

  10. A. Edwards was among the first to speak of islamism. See (Edwards 1913).

  11. For an example of this sort of modern nation-state rejection, see (Taji-Farouk 2000).

  12. This concept – known as ḥakimiyyah – was first developed by Abu al-A’la al-Mawdudi, founder of Jamaat-e-Islami. See (Mawdudi 1976).

  13. The likes of Samuel Huntington have added fuel to this confusion. See (Huntington 2002).

  14. This refers to regimes in and around the Middle East, and is as opposed to the Far Enemy, the rest of the world, perceived to be oppressive by dint of being un-Islamic or anti-islamist. For a more in-depth explanation, see (Gerges 2009).

  15. The Arabic text of Tunisia’s new constitution, in which there is no mention of sharī’ah, is available on http://www.marsad.tn/constitution.

References

  • Abu Ghaith, S. (2002). ‘Why we fight America’: Al-Qa’ida spokesman explains September 11 and declares intentions to kill 4 million Americans with weapons of mass destruction. Special Dispatch Series 388, available at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/702860/posts.

  • Al-Bukhari, M. I. (2002). Sahih. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Raffie, D. (2013). Social identity theory for investigating Islamic extremism in the diaspora. Journal of Strategic Security, 6, 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, R. S. (1998). Religion and global affairs: Religious “Militants for Peace”. SAIS Review, 18(2), 38–44.

  • Appleby, R. S., & Marty, M. (2002). Fundamentalism. Foreign Policy, 128, 16–18+20–22.

  • Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shari’ah – A Beginner’s Guide. London/Washington: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoob, M. (2011). The many faces of political Islam: religion and politics in the Muslim world. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. (2006). Islam without fear: Egypt and the new Islamists. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannerman, P. (2013). Islam in perspective: a guide to Islamic society, politics and law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1996). Jihad vs McWorld. London: Corgi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, A. (2005). Islamism and social movement theory. Third World Quarterly, 6, 891–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. M. (2014). War on error. Foreign Policy, available at http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/02/04/war_on_error_al_qaeda_terrorism, (07-02-2014).

  • Berman, S. (2003). Islamism, revolution, and civil society. Perspectives on Politics, 1, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E., & Iannacone, L. (2006). Religious extremism: the good, the bad, and the deadly. Public Choice, 128, 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., Heff, J., & Lynch, M. (2010). Islamism, unveiled: from Berlin to Cairo and back again. Foreign Affairs, 89, 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin Laden, O. (2005). Messages to the world: the statements of Osama bin Laden. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanate, L. (1979). Some unanticipated consequences of terrorism. Journal of Peace Research, 16, 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavatorta, F. (2005). The “War on terrorism” – perspectives from radical Islamic groups’. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 16, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denoeux, G. (2002). The forgotten swamp: navigating political Islam. Middle East Policy, 9, 56–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominiczak, P. (2013). Tony Blair: Woolwich attack shows there is a problem ‘within Islam’. The Telegraph, available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10094007/Tony-Blair-Woolwich-attack-shows-there-is-a-problem-within-Islam.html, (10-02-2014).

  • Edwards, A. (1913). The menace of pan-Islamism. The North American Review, 690, 645–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M., & Hartman, D. (2006). The rise of religious fundamentalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J. (2000). Political Islam and the West. JFQ Forum, (Spring Issue), 50–55.

  • Euben, R. (2002). Killing (for) politics: jihad, martyrdom and political action. Political Theory, 30, 4–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, M. (2005). Radicalisation as a reaction to failure: an economic model of Islamic extremism. Public Choice, 122, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, R. (1999). Jihad: the origin of holy war in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerges, F. (2009). The Far Enemy: why jihad went global. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. (1996). Fundamentalism, its roots, rationale and remedy. Economic and Political Weekly, 31, 1115–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. (1989). Conceptualisations of terrorism. American Sociological Review, 54, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, M. (2004). Why Muslims rebel: repression and resistance in the Islamic world. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, E. (2004). Civil rights in peril: the targeting of Arabs and Muslims. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, U. (2012). The Balance of Islam in Challenging Extremism (Religious Reform Series 1). London: Quilliam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, U. (2013). No compulsion in religion: Islam and the freedom of belief’ (Religious Reform Series 2). London: Quilliam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hizb ut-Tahrir. (2000). The method to re-establish the Khilafah and resume the Islamic way of life. London: Al-Khilafah Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, J. (1986). Terrorism and counter-terrorism: institutionalising political order. The Australian Quarterly, 58, 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (2002). The Clash of Civilisations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husain, E. (2007). The Islamist. Penguin.

  • Jansen, J. (1986). The neglected duty: the creed of Sadat’s assassins and Islamic resurgence in the Middle East. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, M. H. (2001). Issues in the Legal Theory of Usul and Prospects for Reform. Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, M. H. (2014). Al-Maqasid al-Shari’ah: the objectives of Islamic law. Association of Muslim Lawyers, available at http://www.aml.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/journals/3.1/Kamali-Maqasid.pdf, (10-02-2014).

  • Kung, H. (2009). Islam: Past, Present & Future. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, E. (1863). Arabic English Lexicon. London: Williams and Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, B. (2000). Shattering the myth: Islam beyond violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, C. (1983). Extremism as a religious norm. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEoin, D. (2009). Music, chess and other sins. London: Civitas, available at http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/MusicChessAndOtherSins.pdf.

  • Mansur, S. (2013). Islam and Islamism, Gatestone Institute, available at http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3865/islam-islamism, (10-02-2014).

  • Marsden, G. (2006). Fundamentalism and American culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. (1988). Fundamentalism as a social phenomenon. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 42, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. (1996). Too bad we’re so relevant: the Fundamentalism Project projected. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49, 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdudi, A. A. (1954). Tahrik-e-Islami ki Akhlaqi Bunyadeen (trans: Charles Adams, Karachi and Lahore).

  • Mawdudi, A. A. (1976). Political theory of Islam. Lahore: Islamic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster. (2014). Extremism. Merriam Webster English Dictionary. Encyclopedia Britannica, available at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/extremism, (10-02-2014).

  • Miles, W. (2004). Conclusions. African Studies Review, 47, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moallem, M. (2002). Whose fundamentalism? Meridians, 2, 298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz, M. (2013). Radical. WH Allen.

  • Norton, A. R. (2007). Hezbollah: a short history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford. (2014). Islamism. Oxford dictionaries, available at http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/Islamism, 10-02-2014.

  • Paret, R. (1954). In H. Gibb & J. Kramers (Eds.), ‘Ummah’, The Shorter Encyclopedia of Islam. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (2005). Terrorism, tyranny, and religious extremism as collective activity: beyond the deviant, psychological and power mystiques. The American Sociologist, 36, 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan, T. (2009). Radical Reform. OUP.

  • Roy, O. (2006). Globalised Islam: the search for a new umma. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggar, S. (2010). Pariah politics: understanding Western radical Islamism and what should be done. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (2008). Covering Islam: how the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, M. (2007). Jihad, modernity, secularism. Nova Religio: the Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 11, 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seleny, A. (2006). Tradition, modernity and democracy: the many promise of Islam. Perspectives on Politics, 4, 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A. (2010). Oxford English Dictionary (p. 2010). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taji-Farouk, S. (2000). Islamists and threat of jihad: Hizb ut-Tahrir and al-Muhajiroun on Israel and the Jews. Middle Eastern Studies, 36, 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibi, B. (2013). The Islamist venture of the politicization of Islam to an ideology of Islamism: a critique of the dominating narrative in Western Islamic Studies. Soundings, 431–449.

  • Townsend, K. (1999). Frank Tannenbaum: “dramatization of evil”. Dept of Criminology, Florida State University.

  • Turner, J. (2012). Untangling Islamism from jihadism: opportunities for Islam and the West after the Arab Spring. Arab Studies Quarterly, 34, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Niewenhuijze, C. (1995). Islamism: a defiant utopianism. Die Welt des Islams, 35, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varisco, D. (2010). Inventing Islamism: The Violence of Rhetoric. In R. C. Martin & A. Barzegar (Eds.), Islamism: Contested Perspectives on Political Islam (pp. 33–50). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). Science as a vocation. In Max Weber: Essays in sociology (trans: Girth H. and Wright Mills C.), (pp. 129–156). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Wehr, H. (1980). In J. Milton Cowan (Ed.), A dictionary of modern written Arabic. London: Macdonald and Evans Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). A genealogy of radical Islam. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 28, 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (2006). Extremism, suicide terror, and authoritarianism. The Political Economy of Terrorism, 128, 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, M. (2009). A taxonomy of jihad. Arab Studies Quarterly, 31, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usama Hasan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winter, C., Hasan, U. The Balanced Nation: Islam and the Challenges of Extremism, Fundamentalism, Islamism and Jihadism. Philosophia 44, 667–688 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9634-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9634-2

Keywords

Navigation